Yanwei Sun1, Sijia Chen2, Chen Zhang3, Yali Liu4, Li Ma1, Xiangyu Zhang5. 1. Department of Preventive Dentistry & Pediatric Dentistry, School of Stomatology, Tianjin Medical University, No. 22, Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin 300070, China. 2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Ruitai Stomatological Hospital, Beiyuan Road, Beijing 100107, China. 3. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Qingdao Stomatological Hospital, Dexian Road, No. 17, Qingdao 266003, China. 4. Department of Operative Dentistry & Endodontics, Tanggu Stomatological Hospital, No. 171, Yongjiu Street, Tianjin 300450, China. 5. Department of Preventive Dentistry & Pediatric Dentistry, School of Stomatology, Tianjin Medical University, No. 22, Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin 300070, China. Electronic address: xzhang04@tmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Lemon essential oil (LEO) is a kind of secondary metabolite from lemon peels and has been found to inhibit cariogenic bacteria for decades. However, its effects on main cariogenic virulence factors are rarely reported. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of LEO on the acid tolerance and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and preliminarily reveal the possible underlying mechanisms. DESIGNS: Effects of LEO on the acid tolerance and biofilm formation of S. mutans were investigated by the broth dilution method and crystal violet staining method respectively. The expression of luxS, srtA and spaP gene was also determined to explore the underlying mechanism. In addition, Tea polyphenols (TP), a major natural inhibitor of cariogenic virulence factors, and limonene (LIM), the major component of LEO, were selected as comparisons to evaluate the effects of LEO. RESULTS: Sub-MICs of LEO, LIM and TP exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of growth of S. mutans at pH ranging from 4.0 to 7.0. The formation of S. mutans biofilm was remarkably inhibited and the inhibitory rates of LEO, LIM and TP were 97.87%, 94.88% and 96.01% respectively at 1/2 MIC. Similarly, a down-regulation was observed in the expression of luxS, srtA and spaP gene at sub-MIC levels. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of LEO were similar or slightly stronger than LIM and TP, suggesting that LEO might represent a novel, natural anticarious agent that inhibited the specific genes associated with bacterial acid tolerance and biofilm formation without necessarily affecting the growth of oral bacteria.
OBJECTIVES:Lemon essential oil (LEO) is a kind of secondary metabolite from lemon peels and has been found to inhibit cariogenic bacteria for decades. However, its effects on main cariogenic virulence factors are rarely reported. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations (sub-MICs) of LEO on the acid tolerance and biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and preliminarily reveal the possible underlying mechanisms. DESIGNS: Effects of LEO on the acid tolerance and biofilm formation of S. mutans were investigated by the broth dilution method and crystal violet staining method respectively. The expression of luxS, srtA and spaP gene was also determined to explore the underlying mechanism. In addition, Tea polyphenols (TP), a major natural inhibitor of cariogenic virulence factors, and limonene (LIM), the major component of LEO, were selected as comparisons to evaluate the effects of LEO. RESULTS: Sub-MICs of LEO, LIM and TP exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of growth of S. mutans at pH ranging from 4.0 to 7.0. The formation of S. mutans biofilm was remarkably inhibited and the inhibitory rates of LEO, LIM and TP were 97.87%, 94.88% and 96.01% respectively at 1/2 MIC. Similarly, a down-regulation was observed in the expression of luxS, srtA and spaP gene at sub-MIC levels. CONCLUSIONS: Effects of LEO were similar or slightly stronger than LIM and TP, suggesting that LEO might represent a novel, natural anticarious agent that inhibited the specific genes associated with bacterial acid tolerance and biofilm formation without necessarily affecting the growth of oral bacteria.
Authors: Timothy D Leathers; Joseph O Rich; Kenneth M Bischoff; Christopher D Skory; Melinda S Nunnally Journal: Biotechnol Rep (Amst) Date: 2018-12-21
Authors: Dominik Radzki; Marta Wilhelm-Węglarz; Katarzyna Pruska; Aida Kusiak; Iwona Ordyniec-Kwaśnica Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: María Constanza Luciardi; María Amparo Blázquez; María Rosa Alberto; Elena Cartagena; Mario Eduardo Arena Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 4.411