Literature DB >> 29331311

Prediction of mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with the new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 classification: a cohort study.

Anne Gedebjerg1, Szimonetta Komjáthiné Szépligeti2, Laura-Maria Holm Wackerhausen3, Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó2, Ronald Dahl4, Jens Georg Hansen2, Henrik Toft Sørensen2, Mette Nørgaard2, Peter Lange5, Reimar Wernich Thomsen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017 classification separates the spirometric 1-4 staging from the ABCD groups defined by symptoms and exacerbations. Little is known about how this new classification predicts mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aimed to establish the predictive ability of the GOLD 2017 classification, compared with earlier classifications, for all-cause and respiratory mortality, both when using its main ABCD groups and when further subdividing according to spirometric 1-4 staging.
METHODS: In this nationwide cohort study, we enrolled patients with COPD with data available in the Danish registry for COPD. To be included in this registry, individuals must have been outpatients in hospital-based pulmonary clinics in Denmark. Eligible patients were aged 30 years or older; had received a primary diagnosis of COPD (International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-10 J44.X) or acute respiratory failure (ICD-10 J96.X) in combination with COPD (ICD-10 J44.X) as a secondary diagnosis; and had complete data on FEV1, body-mass index, modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale score, and smoking status. We categorised eligible patients with complete data according to the 2007, 2011, and 2017 GOLD classifications at the first contact with an outpatient clinic. For the GOLD 2017 classification, we further subdivided the patients by spirometry into 16 subgroups (1A to 4D). We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and respiratory mortality and compared the predictive ability of the three GOLD classifications (2007, 2011, and 2017) using receiver operating curves.
FINDINGS: We enrolled 33 765 patients with COPD, who were outpatients in Danish hospitals between Jan 1, 2008, and Nov 30, 2013, in the main cohort assessed for all-cause mortality. 22 621 of these patients had data available on cause-specific mortality (respiratory) and were included in a subcohort followed from Jan 1, 2008, to Dec 31, 2011. For the GOLD 2017 classification, 3 year mortality increased with increasing exacerbations and dyspnoea from group A (all-cause mortality 10·0%, respiratory mortality 3·0%) to group D (all-cause mortality 36·9%, respiratory mortality 18·0%). However, 3 year mortality was higher for group B patients (all-cause mortality 23·8%, respiratory mortality 9·7%) than for group C patients (all-cause mortality 17·4%, respiratory mortality 6·4%). Compared with group A, adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality ranged from 2·05 (95% CI 1·87-2·26) for group B, to 1·47 (1·31-1·65) for group C, and to 3·01 (2·75-3·30) for group D. Area under the curve for all-cause mortality was 0·61 (95% CI 0·60-0·61) for GOLD 2007, 0·61 (0·60-0·62) for GOLD 2011, and 0·63 (0·53-0·73) for GOLD 2017. Area under the curve for respiratory mortality was 0·64 (0·62-0·65) for GOLD 2007, 0·63 (0·62-0·64) for GOLD 2011, and 0·65 (0·53-0·78) for GOLD 2017. The GOLD 2017 classification based on ABCD groups only did not predict mortality better than the earlier 2007 and 2011 GOLD classifications. However, when 16 subgroups (1A to 4D) were defined, the new classification predicted mortality more accurately than the previous systems (p<0·0001).
INTERPRETATION: We showed that the new GOLD 2017 ABCD classification does not predict all-cause and respiratory mortality more accurately than the previous GOLD systems from 2007 and 2011. FUNDING: Danish Lung Association, Program for Clinical Research Infrastructure.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29331311     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30002-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  24 in total

1.  Association between frailty index, lung function, and major clinical determinants in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Simone Scarlata; Panaiotis Finamore; Alice Laudisio; Vittorio Cardaci; Mattia Ramaccia; Francesco D'Alessandro; Claudio Pedone; Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi; Matteo Cesari
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 2.  Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: moving from symptom relief to mortality reduction.

Authors:  Alessandro Celi; Manuela Latorre; Pierluigi Paggiaro; Riccardo Pistelli
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Validation of the GOLD 2017 and new 16 subgroups (1A-4D) classifications in predicting exacerbation and mortality in COPD patients.

Authors:  Meng-Zhi Han; Tzuen-Ren Hsiue; Sheng-Han Tsai; Tang-Hsiu Huang; Xin-Min Liao; Chiung-Zuei Chen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-10-18

4.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes in Japanese patients with COPD according to the 2017 GOLD classification: the Ishinomaki COPD Network Registry.

Authors:  Seiichi Kobayashi; Masakazu Hanagama; Masatsugu Ishida; Hikari Sato; Manabu Ono; Shinsuke Yamanda; Mitsuhiro Yamada; Hiroyuki Aizawa; Masaru Yanai
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-12-06

5.  Old Friends, Old Wine, and Old COPD Classification Are Best.

Authors:  Chin Kook Rhee
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2018-10

6.  Does the GOLD 2017 Classification Improve the Ability to Predict Exacerbation and Mortality?

Authors:  Hun Gyu Hwang
Journal:  Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul)       Date:  2018-06-19

7.  Long-term cost and utility consequences of short-term clinically important deterioration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the TORCH study.

Authors:  Victoria Federico Paly; Ian Naya; Necdet B Gunsoy; Maurice T Driessen; Nancy Risebrough; Andrew Briggs; Afisi S Ismaila
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2019-05-03

8.  Which GOLD B patients progress to GOLD D with the new classification?

Authors:  Hye Sook Choi; Ju Ock Na; Jong Deog Lee; Kyeong-Cheol Shin; Chin Kook Rhee; Yong Il Hwang; Seong Yong Lim; Kwang Ha Yoo; Ki Suck Jung; Yong Bum Park
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-10-12

9.  COPD assessment test and FEV1: do they predict oxygen uptake in COPD?

Authors:  Luiz Carlos S Carvalho-Jr; Renata Trimer; Guilherme Pt Arêas; Flávia Cr Caruso; Katiany Tl Zangrando; Soraia Pilon Jürgensen; José C Bonjorno; Cláudio Ricardo de Oliveira; Ramona Cabiddu; Renata G Mendes; Audrey Borghi-Silva
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-10-08

10.  The Characteristics of Airflow Limitation and Future Exacerbations in Different GOLD Groups of COPD Patients.

Authors:  Qing Song; Yi-Yang Zhao; Yu-Qin Zeng; Cong Liu; Wei Cheng; Min-Hua Deng; Xin Li; Li-Bing Ma; Yan Chen; Shan Cai; Ping Chen
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.