Literature DB >> 29330608

Environmental Performance Information Use by Conservation Agency Staff.

Chloe Bradley Wardropper1.   

Abstract

Performance-based conservation has long been recognized as crucial to improving program effectiveness, particularly when environmental conditions are dynamic. Yet few studies have investigated the use of environmental performance information by staff of conservation organizations. This article identifies attitudinal, policy and organizational factors influencing the use of a type of performance information-water quality information-by Soil and Water Conservation District staff in the Upper Mississippi River Basin region. An online survey (n = 277) revealed a number of important variables associated with greater information use. Variables included employees' prosocial motivation, or the belief that they helped people and natural resources through their job, the perceived trustworthiness of data, the presence of a U.S. Clean Water Act Total Maximum Daily Load standard designation, and staff discretion to prioritize programs locally. Conservation programs that retain motivated staff and provide them the resources and flexibility to plan and evaluate their work with environmental data may increase conservation effectiveness under changing conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evidence-based conservation; Performance measurement; Public management; Soil and water conservation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330608     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0990-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  6 in total

1.  Reforming agricultural nonpoint pollution policy in an increasingly budget-constrained environment.

Authors:  James S Shortle; Marc Ribaudo; Richard D Horan; David Blandford
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  The need for evidence-based conservation.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Andrew S Pullin; Paul M Dolman; Teri M Knight
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  The impact of scientific information on ecosystem management: making sense of the contextual gap between information providers and decision makers.

Authors:  Ernita van Wyk; Dirk J Roux; Mikael Drackner; Stephen F McCool
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management.

Authors:  Matt Keene; Andrew S Pullin
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.789

5.  Accounting for results: how conservation organizations report performance information.

Authors:  Adena R Rissman; Robert Smail
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin.

Authors:  Richard B Alexander; Richard A Smith; Gregory E Schwarz; Elizabeth W Boyer; Jacqueline V Nolan; John W Brakebill
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.