Serap Koybasi1, Yusuf Ozgur Bicer2, Sinan Seyhan2, Selcan Kesgin2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Izzet Baysal Medical Faculty, Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14280, Bolu, Turkey. serapkoybasi@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Izzet Baysal Medical Faculty, Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14280, Bolu, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty is a complex but commonly applied surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction is the least discussed but one of the most important determinants of surgical success. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the patient satisfaction together with surgeon satisfaction were the main goals of this study. The roles of anxiety, gender, age and follow-up period were also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 53 eligible patients operated by the first two authors within the previous 2 years were enrolled in the study. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as the details of the surgical procedure. Functional and esthetic satisfactions of the patients were evaluated by VAS and ROE respectively. Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by VAS in crosswise manner. Anxiety was measured by STAI_s and STAI_t scales. RESULTS: The analysis concerning esthetic results as well as functional results did not reveal any significant difference between the two surgeons (p = 0.132, p = 0.43 respectively). ROE scores were significantly different among patients with "good" and "very good" functional results. The difference between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction was found to be insignificant (p = 0.273). Correlation analysis yielded a positive correlation between STAI_I and STAI_II (Pearson r = 0.335, p = 0.014) but not between STAI scores and ROE scores. Moreover, there was no relation between anxiety scores and the functional results. Likely, gender as well as age, follow-up, and surgical technique were not found to have any effect on patient satisfaction either. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction is preferential in rhinoplasty. In our patient series, patient satisfaction was shown to be correlated with functional outcome but not with surgeon satisfaction. Anxiety was not found to have a significant impact on results of rhinoplasty. Our results should be interpreted cautiously keeping in mind that our patients' primary drive for rhinoplasty was functional.
BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty is a complex but commonly applied surgical procedure. Patient satisfaction is the least discussed but one of the most important determinants of surgical success. OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the patient satisfaction together with surgeon satisfaction were the main goals of this study. The roles of anxiety, gender, age and follow-up period were also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 53 eligible patients operated by the first two authors within the previous 2 years were enrolled in the study. The medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as the details of the surgical procedure. Functional and esthetic satisfactions of the patients were evaluated by VAS and ROE respectively. Surgeon satisfaction was evaluated by VAS in crosswise manner. Anxiety was measured by STAI_s and STAI_t scales. RESULTS: The analysis concerning esthetic results as well as functional results did not reveal any significant difference between the two surgeons (p = 0.132, p = 0.43 respectively). ROE scores were significantly different among patients with "good" and "very good" functional results. The difference between surgeon satisfaction and patient satisfaction was found to be insignificant (p = 0.273). Correlation analysis yielded a positive correlation between STAI_I and STAI_II (Pearson r = 0.335, p = 0.014) but not between STAI scores and ROE scores. Moreover, there was no relation between anxiety scores and the functional results. Likely, gender as well as age, follow-up, and surgical technique were not found to have any effect on patient satisfaction either. CONCLUSION:Patient satisfaction is preferential in rhinoplasty. In our patient series, patient satisfaction was shown to be correlated with functional outcome but not with surgeon satisfaction. Anxiety was not found to have a significant impact on results of rhinoplasty. Our results should be interpreted cautiously keeping in mind that our patients' primary drive for rhinoplasty was functional.
Authors: Elizabeth Mia Floyd; Sandra Ho; Prayag Patel; Richard M Rosenfeld; Eli Gordin Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2017-02-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Jasmijn M Herruer; Judith B Prins; Niels van Heerbeek; Godelieve W J A Verhage-Damen; Koen J A O Ingels Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Anne F Klassen; Stefan J Cano; Charles A East; Stephen B Baker; Lydia Badia; Jonathan A Schwitzer; Andrea L Pusic Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2016 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.611
Authors: Kayva L Crawford; Jason H Lee; Bharat A Panuganti; Brittany N Burton; Aria Jafari; David B Hom; Deborah Watson Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2020-11-12
Authors: Amin Kalaaji; Stine Dreyer; Jakob Schnegg; Lena Sanosyan; Tatjana Radovic; Ivana Maric Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Date: 2019-09-30