| Literature DB >> 29330405 |
Jordan Gauthier1,2, Xavier Poiré3, Anne-Claire Gac4, Mathieu Leclerc5, Thierry Guillaume6, Yves Chalandon7, Stéphanie Nguyen8, Edouard Forcade9, Caroline Régny10, Jacques-Olivier Bay11, Ali Bazarbachi12, Pierre-Simon Rohrlich13, Anne Huynh14, Jonathan Farhi15, Tony Marchand16, Jean-Valère Malfuson17, Sylvain Pilorge18, Hélène Labussière-Wallet19, Cécile Renard20, Luc-Matthieu Fornecker21, Marie Detrait22, Rémy Duléry23, Jérémy Delage24, Anne-Lise Ménard25, Amandine Charbonnier26, Brigitte Nelken27, Charlotte Jubert28, Felipe Suarez29, Régis Peffault de la Tour30, Yves Beguin31, Hélène Schoemans32, Didier Blaise33, Ibrahim Yakoub-Agha34,35,36.
Abstract
The question of the best donor type between haploidentical (HAPLO) and matched-related donors (MRD) for patients with advanced HL receiving an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still debated. Given the lack of data comparing these two types of donor in the setting of non-myeloablative (NMA) or reduced-intensity (RIC) allo-HCT, we performed a multicentre retrospective study using graft-vs.-host disease-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) as our primary endpoint. We analysed the data of 151 consecutive HL patients who underwent NMA or RIC allo-HCT from a HAPLO (N = 61) or MRD (N = 90) between January 2011 and January 2016. GRFS was defined as the probability of being alive without evidence of relapse, grade 3-4 acute GVHD or chronic GVHD. In multivariable analysis, MRD donors were independently associated with lower GRFS compared to HAPLO donors (HR = 2.95, P < 0.001). Disease status at transplant other than CR was also associated with lower GRFS in multivariable analysis (HR = 1.74, P = 0.01). In addition, the administration of ATG was independently linked to higher GRFS (HR = 0.52, P = 0.009). In summary, we observed significantly higher GRFS in HL patients receiving an allo-HCT using the HAPLO PT-Cy platform compared to MRD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29330405 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-017-0018-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant ISSN: 0268-3369 Impact factor: 5.483