Literature DB >> 29330335

Fabry Disease: prevalence of affected males and heterozygotes with pathogenic GLA mutations identified by screening renal, cardiac and stroke clinics, 1995-2017.

Dana Doheny1, Ram Srinivasan1, Silvere Pagant1, Brenden Chen1, Makiko Yasuda1, Robert J Desnick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fabry Disease (FD), an X linked lysosomal storage disease due to pathogenic α-galactosidase A (GLA) mutations, results in two major subtypes, the early-onset Type 1 'Classic' and the Type 2 'Later-Onset' phenotypes. To identify previously unrecognised patients, investigators screened cardiac, renal and stroke clinics by enzyme assays. However, some screening studies did not perform confirmatory GLA mutation analyses, and many included recently recognised 'benign/likely-benign' variants, thereby inflating prevalence estimates.
METHODS: Online databases were searched for all FD screening studies in high-risk clinics (1995-2017). Studies reporting GLA mutations were re-analysed for pathogenic mutations, sex and phenotype. Phenotype-specific and sex-specific prevalence rates were determined.
RESULTS: Of 67 studies, 63 that screened 51363patients (33943M and 17420F) and provided GLA mutations were reanalysed for disease-causing mutations. Of reported GLA mutations, benign variants occurred in 47.9% of males and 74.1% of females. The following were the revised prevalence estimates: among 36820 (23954M and 12866F) haemodialysis screenees, 0.21% males and 0.15% females; among 3074 (2031M and 1043F) renal transplant screenees, 0.25% males and no females; among 5491 (4054M and 1437F) cardiac screenees, 0.94% males and 0.90% females; and among 5978 (3904M and 2074F) stroke screenees, 0.13% males and 0.14% females. Among male and female screenees with pathogenic mutations, the type 1 Classic phenotype was predominant (~60%), except more male cardiac patients (75%) had type 2 Later-Onset phenotype.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous findings, reanalysis of 63 studies increased the screenee numbers (~3.4-fold), eliminated 20 benign/likely benign variants, and provided more accurate sex-specific and phenotype-specific prevalence estimates, ranging from ~0.13% of stroke to ~0.9% of cardiac male or female screenees. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiomyopathy; fabry disease; hemodialysis; prevalence; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330335     DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-105080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  32 in total

Review 1.  Heritable and non-heritable uncommon causes of stroke.

Authors:  A Bersano; M Kraemer; A Burlina; M Mancuso; J Finsterer; S Sacco; C Salvarani; L Caputi; H Chabriat; S Lesnik Oberstein; A Federico; E Tournier Lasserve; D Hunt; M Dichgans; M Arnold; S Debette; H S Markus
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The Changing Landscape of Fabry Disease.

Authors:  Einar Svarstad; Hans Peter Marti
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Narrative review on Morbus Fabry: diagnosis and management of cardiac manifestations.

Authors:  Aleš Linhart; Tomáš Paleček
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

4.  High-risk screening for Anderson-Fabry disease in patients with cardiac, renal, or neurological manifestations.

Authors:  Naoki Nakagawa; Jun Sawada; Naka Sakamoto; Toshiharu Takeuchi; Fumihiko Takahashi; Jun-Ich Maruyama; Ken Momosaki; Kimitoshi Nakamura; Fumio Endo; Naoyuki Hasebe
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Coronary microvascular disease in hypertrophic and infiltrative cardiomyopathies.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Ronny R Buechel; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 6.  Beyond Sarcomeric Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: How to Diagnose and Manage Phenocopies.

Authors:  Maurizio Pieroni; Michele Ciabatti; Elisa Saletti; Valentina Tavanti; Pasquale Santangeli; Lucia Martinese; Francesco Liistro; Iacopo Olivotto; Leonardo Bolognese
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.955

Review 7.  2021 TSOC Expert Consensus on the Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Cardiac Manifestations of Fabry Disease.

Authors:  Chung-Lieh Hung; Yen-Wen Wu; Chih-Chan Lin; Chih-Hung Lai; Jimmy Jyh-Ming Juang; Ting-Hsing Chao; Ling Kuo; Kuo-Tzu Sung; Chao-Yung Wang; Chun-Li Wang; Chun-Yuan Chu; Wen-Chung Yu; Charles Jia-Yin Hou
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 8.  The benefits and challenges of family genetic testing in rare genetic diseases-lessons from Fabry disease.

Authors:  Dominique P Germain; Sergey Moiseev; Fernando Suárez-Obando; Faisal Al Ismaili; Huda Al Khawaja; Gheona Altarescu; Fellype C Barreto; Farid Haddoum; Fatemeh Hadipour; Irina Maksimova; Mirelle Kramis; Sheela Nampoothiri; Khanh Ngoc Nguyen; Dau-Ming Niu; Juan Politei; Long-Sun Ro; Dung Vu Chi; Nan Chen; Sergey Kutsev
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 9.  Fabry Disease and the Heart: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Olga Azevedo; Filipa Cordeiro; Miguel Fernandes Gago; Gabriel Miltenberger-Miltenyi; Catarina Ferreira; Nuno Sousa; Damião Cunha
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Brazilian consensus recommendations for the diagnosis, screening, and treatment of individuals with fabry disease: Committee for Rare Diseases - Brazilian Society of Nephrology/2021.

Authors:  Cassiano Augusto Braga Silva; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade; Maria Helena Vaisbich; Fellype de Carvalho Barreto
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.