Literature DB >> 29330172

Origins of tobacco harm reduction in the UK: the 'Product Modification Programme' (1972-1991).

Jesse Elias1, Pamela M Ling2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the current embrace of long-term nicotine maintenance by British governmental agencies and tobacco harm reduction by several leading British public health organisations, describe the context and deliberations of the UK's first formal tobacco risk reduction programme: 'Product Modification'.
METHODS: Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents, news archives and Parliamentary debate records.
RESULTS: From 1972 to 1991, the British government sought to investigate safer smoking through the 'product modification programme'. The Independent Scientific Committee on Smoking and Health (ISCSH) advised the British government on these efforts and collaborated with the tobacco industry, with which government then negotiated to determine policy. The ISCSH operated from four industry-backed premises, which contributed to the ISCSH's support of safer smoking: (1) reduced toxicity indicates reduced risk; (2) collaboration with the tobacco industry will not undermine tobacco control; (3) nicotine addiction is unavoidable; (4) to curtail cigarette use, solutions must be consumer-approved (ie, profitable). These premises often undermined tobacco control efforts and placed the ISCSH at odds with broader currents in public health. The product modification programme was abandoned in 1991 as the European Community began requiring members to adopt upper tar limits, rendering the ISCSH redundant. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Endorsements of reduced harm tobacco products share the same four premises that supported the product modification programme. Current tobacco harm reduction premises and policies supported by the British government and leading British public health organisations may reflect the historical influence of the tobacco industry. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  harm reduction; public policy; tobacco industry; tobacco industry documents

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330172      PMCID: PMC6089384          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  24 in total

1.  Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?

Authors:  R E Malone; E D Balbach
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Out of the ashes: the life, death, and rebirth of the "safer" cigarette in the United States.

Authors:  Amy Fairchild; James Colgrove
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Issue network versus producer network? ASH, the Tobacco Products Research Trust and UK smoking policy.

Authors:  Virginia Berridge
Journal:  Clio Med       Date:  2005

4.  The Pharmaceuticalization of the Tobacco Industry.

Authors:  Yogi Hale Hendlin; Jesse Elias; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Drug therapy. Pharmacologic aspects of cigarette smoking and nicotine addiction.

Authors:  N L Benowitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Smoking, tobacco promotion, and the voluntary agreements.

Authors:  H T Cox
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-01-28

7.  Comment on the Hunter Committee's second report.

Authors:  M J Jarvis; M A Russell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-04-05

8.  Tobacco harm reduction and the evolution of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Tobacco industry documents: comparing the Minnesota Depository and internet access.

Authors:  E D Balbach; R J Gasior; E M Barbeau
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  Understanding the emergence of the tobacco industry's use of the term tobacco harm reduction in order to inform public health policy.

Authors:  Silvy Peeters; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  4 in total

1.  Influence of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) in comparison to conventional cigarette on color stability of dental restorative materials.

Authors:  Fahim Vohra; Abdulelah F Andejani; Osamah Alamri; Abdulaziz Alshehri; Rana S Al-Hamdan; Thamer Almohareb; Tariq Abduljabbar
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Invisible smoke: third-party endorsement and the resurrection of heat-not-burn tobacco products.

Authors:  Jesse Elias; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Heated tobacco products: another tobacco industry global strategy to slow progress in tobacco control.

Authors:  Stella A Bialous; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Confirmatory factor analysis comparing incentivized experiments with self-report methods to elicit adolescent smoking and vaping social norms.

Authors:  Jennifer M Murray; Erik O Kimbrough; Erin L Krupka; Abhijit Ramalingam; Rajnish Kumar; Joanna McHugh Power; Sharon Sanchez-Franco; Olga L Sarmiento; Frank Kee; Ruth F Hunter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.