Veronica X Vela1, Elizabeth W Patton2, Darshak Sanghavi3, Susan F Wood4, Peter Shin5, Sara Rosenbaum6. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Center for Health Policy Research, Washington, DC. Electronic address: veronicaxvela@email.gwu.edu. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Center for Health Policy Research, Washington, DC; Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 5. Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Center for Health Policy Research, Washington, DC; Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 6. Center for Health Policy Research, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is the most effective reversible method to prevent unplanned pregnancies. Variability in state-level policies and the high cost of LARC could create substantial inconsistencies in Medicaid coverage, despite federal guidance aimed at enhancing broad access. This study surveyed state Medicaid payment policies and outreach activities related to LARC to explore the scope of services covered. METHODS: Using publicly available information, we performed a content analysis of state Medicaid family planning and LARC payment policies. Purposeful sampling led to a selection of nine states with diverse geographic locations, political climates, Medicaid expansion status, and the number of women covered by Medicaid. RESULTS: All nine states' Medicaid programs covered some aspects of LARC. However, only a single state's payment structure incorporated all core aspects of high-quality LARC service delivery, including counseling, device, insertion, removal, and follow-up care. Most states did not explicitly address counseling, device removal, or follow-up care. Some states had strategies to enhance access, including policies to increase device reimbursement, stocking and delivery programs to remove cost barriers, and covering devices and insertion after an abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Although Medicaid policy encourages LARC methods, state payment policies frequently fail to address key aspects of care, including counseling, follow-up care, and removal, resulting in highly variable state-level practices. Although some states include payment policy innovations to support LARC access, significant opportunities remain. Published by Elsevier Inc.
CONTEXT: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is the most effective reversible method to prevent unplanned pregnancies. Variability in state-level policies and the high cost of LARC could create substantial inconsistencies in Medicaid coverage, despite federal guidance aimed at enhancing broad access. This study surveyed state Medicaid payment policies and outreach activities related to LARC to explore the scope of services covered. METHODS: Using publicly available information, we performed a content analysis of state Medicaid family planning and LARC payment policies. Purposeful sampling led to a selection of nine states with diverse geographic locations, political climates, Medicaid expansion status, and the number of women covered by Medicaid. RESULTS: All nine states' Medicaid programs covered some aspects of LARC. However, only a single state's payment structure incorporated all core aspects of high-quality LARC service delivery, including counseling, device, insertion, removal, and follow-up care. Most states did not explicitly address counseling, device removal, or follow-up care. Some states had strategies to enhance access, including policies to increase device reimbursement, stocking and delivery programs to remove cost barriers, and covering devices and insertion after an abortion. CONCLUSIONS: Although Medicaid policy encourages LARC methods, state payment policies frequently fail to address key aspects of care, including counseling, follow-up care, and removal, resulting in highly variable state-level practices. Although some states include payment policy innovations to support LARC access, significant opportunities remain. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Titilope Oduyebo; Lauren B Zapata; Maegan E Boutot; Naomi K Tepper; Kathryn M Curtis; Denise V D'Angelo; Polly A Marchbanks; Maura K Whiteman Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lisa Romero; Rachel Powell; Charity Ntansah; Hailey Bednar; Caitlin Green; Anna Brittain; Ruben Torrez; Irene Barrineau; Heather S Pangelinan; Ianeta Timoteo-Liaina; Luis Garcia; Eva Lathrop Journal: Hawaii J Health Soc Welf Date: 2022-09
Authors: Charlan D Kroelinger; Isabel A Morgan; Carla L DeSisto; Cameron Estrich; Lisa F Waddell; Christine Mackie; Ellen Pliska; David A Goodman; Shanna Cox; Alisa Velonis; Kristin M Rankin Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 2.681