Literature DB >> 29329968

Reexamining unconscious response priming: A liminal-prime paradigm.

Maayan Avneon1, Dominique Lamy2.   

Abstract

Research on the limits of unconscious processing typically relies on the subliminal-prime paradigm. However, this paradigm is limited in the issues it can address. Here, we examined the implications of using the liminal-prime paradigm, which allows comparing unconscious and conscious priming with constant stimulation. We adapted an iconic demonstration of unconscious response priming to the liminal-prime paradigm. On the one hand, temporal attention allocated to the prime and its relevance to the task increased the magnitude of response priming. On the other hand, the longer RTs associated with the dual task inherent to the paradigm resulted in response priming being underestimated, because unconscious priming effects were shorter-lived than conscious-priming effects. Nevertheless, when the impact of long RTs was alleviated by considering the fastest trials or by imposing a response deadline, conscious response priming remained considerably larger than unconscious response priming. These findings suggest that conscious perception strongly modulates response priming.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Conscious perception; Dual task; Liminal-prime paradigm; Perceptual Awareness Scale; Task relevance; Temporal attention; Unconscious response priming; Unconscious semantic priming

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29329968     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  4 in total

1.  Effect of Aging on Change of Intention.

Authors:  Ariel Furstenberg; Callum D Dewar; Haim Sompolinsky; Robert T Knight; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Motor expertise modulates unconscious rather than conscious executive control.

Authors:  Fanying Meng; Anmin Li; Yihong You; Chun Xie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Applying Linear Mixed Effects Models (LMMs) in Within-Participant Designs With Subjective Trial-Based Assessments of Awareness-a Caveat.

Authors:  Guido Hesselmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-25

4.  Feature-Based Attentional Weighting and Re-weighting in the Absence of Visual Awareness.

Authors:  Lasse Güldener; Antonia Jüllig; David Soto; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.