| Literature DB >> 29329546 |
Ying He1,2, Tonya L Taylor1, Kiril M Dimitrov1, Salman L Butt1,3, James B Stanton3, Iryna V Goraichuk1,4, Heather Fenton5, Rebecca Poulson6, Jian Zhang3, Corrie C Brown3, Hon S Ip7, Marcos Isidoro-Ayza7,8, Claudio L Afonso9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Newcastle disease viruses (NDV) are highly contagious and cause disease in both wild birds and poultry. A pigeon-adapted variant of genotype VI NDV, often termed pigeon paramyxovirus 1, is commonly isolated from columbids in the United States and worldwide. Complete genomic characterization of these genotype VI viruses circulating in wild columbids in the United States is limited, and due to the genetic variability of the virus, failure of rapid diagnostic detection has been reported. Therefore, in this study, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples were subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify and characterize these circulating viruses, providing valuable genetic information. NGS enables multiple samples to be deep-sequenced in parallel. When used on FFPE samples, this methodology allows for retrospective studies of infectious organisms.Entities:
Keywords: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded; High-throughput sequencing; NDV; NGS; Newcastle disease virus; Next-generation sequencing
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29329546 PMCID: PMC5767055 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-017-0914-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Summary of next-generation sequencing data and percent coverage of Newcastle disease virus genomes obtained from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples of wild pigeons collected in the U.S. between 2010 and 2016
| SEPRL ID | Tissue | Species | Statea | Year | NDV readse | % cover.f | IHCg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1178-2 | Liver | ECDO | NM | 2013 | + | ||
| 1178-3 | Spleen | + | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1179-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1179-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1182-2 | Liver | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 1183-1 | Kidney | ECDO | TX | 2015 | + | ||
| 1183-3 | Liver | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1184-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1184-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1185-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1185-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
| 1187-1 | Kidney | ROPId | PA | 2011 | N | ||
| 1187-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1187-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1188-2 | Liver | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1189-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1189-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1191-2 | Liver | + | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1192-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1192-3 | Spleen | + | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1193-2 | Liver | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1194-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1194-3 | Spleen | N | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1195-2 | Liver | N | |||||
| 1195-3 | Spleen | + |
aAbbreviations of states: MT Montana, PA Pennsylvania, TX Texas, NM New Mexico, UT Utah, MA Massachusetts, KS Kansas
bPositive samples are in bold font
cECDO (Eurasian collared-dove)
dROPI (rock pigeon)
eNumbers of paired reads used to re-call the final NDV consensus for each sequence
fPercent coverage - the fraction of the expected full genome length covered by the consensus scaffold
gIHC (immunohistochemistry); N (negative); + (positive)
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree constructed using the complete fusion gene coding sequences of genotype VI Newcastle disease viruses. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum-likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The analysis involved 72 complete fusion gene nucleotide sequences of genotype VI, and there were a total of 1662 positions in the final dataset. The NDV sequences obtained from this study are highlighted in either green (VIn) or red (VIa) colored font, and the distinction between all VIa and VIn viruses is designated by brackets and Roman numerals for the sub-genotype VI designation. The taxa names are labeled by the sub-genotype using Roman numerals, the GenBank identification number, the host organism, the collection country with state designation if from the U.S., the strain designation, and the year of collection. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [21]
Estimates of evolutionary distances between genotype VI Newcastle disease virus sub-genotypes
The number of base substitutions per site from averaging over all sequence pairs between groups are shown. Analyses were conducted using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model. The rate variation among sites was modeled with a gamma distribution (shape parameter = 1). The analysis involved 307 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd + Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6
Fig. 2Phylogenetic tree constructed using the complete genome concatenated coding sequences of genotype VI Newcastle disease viruses. The evolutionary history was inferred using the Maximum-likelihood method based on the General Time Reversible model with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The analysis involved 41 complete genome concatenated coding sequences of genotype VI, and there were a total of 13,744 positions in the final dataset. The NDV sequences obtained from this study are highlighted in either green (VIn) or red (VIa) colored font, and the distinction between all VIa and VIn viruses is designated by brackets and Roman numerals for the sub-genotype VI designation. The taxa names are labeled by the sub-genotype using Roman numerals, the GenBank identification number, the host organism, the collection country with state designation if from the U.S., the strain designation, and the year of collection. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA6 [21]