Literature DB >> 2932814

Effect of bronchodilators on the cough response to inhaled citric acid in normal and asthmatic subjects.

J C Pounsford, M J Birch, K B Saunders.   

Abstract

Coughing was induced in seven normal and eight asthmatic subjects by giving successive inhalations of citric acid aerosols of progressively higher concentration (range 0.5-32%). A baseline cough response was obtained on each of four experimental days, and there was no significant difference between days in this respect. Then the subjects received by inhalation either a bronchodilator (salbutamol 5 mg or ipratropium 1 mg) or placebo, in a paired double blind crossover design. A second citric acid run followed and was used for paired drug-placebo comparisons. In the asthmatic subjects the cough response was diminished by both bronchodilators (p less than 0.05), and the cough threshold was significantly higher after ipratropium but not salbutamol. In normal subjects no significant effects were found. Airways calibre was assessed, by an oscillatory technique that measures the resistance of the respiratory system (Siemens Siregnost FD 5), in four of the seven normal and all eight asthmatic subjects. The mean respiratory resistance was higher in asthmatic than in normal subjects, and fell significantly after both bronchodilators. In normal subjects smaller decreases in respiratory resistance occurred, significant only with salbutamol. The simplest hypothesis which explains the results relates change in cough response to altered neuroreceptor sensitivity associated with rapid changes in bronchial calibre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2932814      PMCID: PMC460166          DOI: 10.1136/thx.40.9.662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  12 in total

1.  The experimental production of cough in human subjects induced by citric acid aerosols; preliminary studies on the evaluation of antitussive agents.

Authors:  H A BICKERMAN; A L BARACH
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1954-08       Impact factor: 2.378

2.  Receptors in the trachea and bronchi of the cat.

Authors:  J G WIDDICOMBE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The site of pulmonary stretch receptors in the cat.

Authors:  J G WIDDICOMBE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-08-27       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  The contribution of reflex inhibition to arthrogenous muscle weakness.

Authors:  M Stokes; A Young
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Diurnal variation and adaptation of the cough response to citric acid in normal subjects.

Authors:  J C Pounsford; K B Saunders
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Location of stretch receptors in the trachea and bronchi of the dog.

Authors:  D Bartlett; P Jeffery; G Sant'ambrogio; J C Wise
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection.

Authors:  D W Empey; L A Laitinen; L Jacobs; W M Gold; J A Nadel
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-02

8.  Chronic cough as the sole presenting manifestation of bronchial asthma.

Authors:  W M Corrao; S S Braman; R S Irwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The response of laryngeal afferent fibres to mechanical and chemical stimuli.

Authors:  H A Boushey; P S Richardson; J G Widdicombe; J C Wise
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Chronic persistent cough in the adult: the spectrum and frequency of causes and successful outcome of specific therapy.

Authors:  R S Irwin; W M Corrao; M R Pratter
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1981-04
View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  [Good sense and nonsense of antitussive agents].

Authors:  A Gillissen; S Tasci; S Ewig; H Schäfer; S Zielen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Cough challenge in the assessment of cough reflex.

Authors:  A H Morice; J A Kastelik; R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Effects of methacholine induced bronchoconstriction and procaterol induced bronchodilation on cough receptor sensitivity to inhaled capsaicin and tartaric acid.

Authors:  M Fujimura; S Sakamoto; Y Kamio; T Matsuda
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Physiology and treatment of cough.

Authors:  R W Fuller; D M Jackson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Effects of inhaled budesonide on spirometric values, reversibility, airway responsiveness, and cough threshold in smokers with chronic obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  B Auffarth; D S Postma; J G de Monchy; T W van der Mark; M Boorsma; G H Koëter
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Relationship between the acid-induced cough response and airway responsiveness and obstruction in children with asthma.

Authors:  T Shimizu; H Mochizuki; K Tokuyama; A Morikawa
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Mechanism of irritant-induced cough: studies with a kinin antagonist and a kallikrein inhibitor.

Authors:  R L Featherstone; J E Parry; D M Evans; D M Jones; H Olsson; M Szelke; M K Church
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.584

8.  Inhibition of artificially induced cough in man by bronchodilators.

Authors:  R Lowry; T Higenbottam; T Johnson; D Godden
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Relationship between respiratory symptoms and cough receptor sensitivity.

Authors:  M F Riordan; C S Beardsmore; A M Brooke; H Simpson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.791

10.  Effect of tiotropium on cough reflex sensitivity in acute viral cough.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis; Leah Spinner; Ganesha Santhyadka; Abdissa Negassa
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 2.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.