| Literature DB >> 29328062 |
Trinity L Hamilton1, Judith M Klatt2,3, Dirk de Beer2, Jennifer L Macalady4.
Abstract
We report the isolation of a pinnacle-forming cyanobacterium isolated from a microbial mat covering the sediment surface at Little Salt Spring-a flooded sinkhole in Florida with a perennially microoxic and sulfidic water column. The draft genome of the isolate encodes all of the enzymatic machinery necessary for both oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis, as well as genes for methylating hopanoids at the C-2 position. The physiological response of the isolate to H2S is complex: (i) no induction time is necessary for anoxygenic photosynthesis; (ii) rates of anoxygenic photosynthesis are regulated by both H2S and irradiance; (iii) O2 production is inhibited by H2S concentrations as low as 1 μM and the recovery rate of oxygenic photosynthesis is dependent on irradiance; (iv) under the optimal light conditions for oxygenic photosynthesis, rates of anoxygenic photosynthesis are nearly double those of oxygenic photosynthesis. We hypothesize that the specific adaptation mechanisms of the isolate to H2S emerged from a close spatial interaction with sulfate-reducing bacteria. The new isolate, Leptolyngbya sp. strain hensonii, is not closely related to other well-characterized Cyanobacteria that can perform anoxygenic photosynthesis, which further highlights the need to characterize the diversity and biogeography of metabolically versatile Cyanobacteria. The isolate will be an ideal model organism for exploring the adaptation of Cyanobacteria to sulfidic conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29328062 PMCID: PMC5776472 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 11.217
Figure 1Proposed model for the kinetic control of the redox reactions involved in oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis by strain hensonii. Gray arrows represent reactions involved only in anoxygenic photosynthesis; black arrows are those reactions that are involved only in oxygenic photosynthesis. E is the photon flux; PSII, PSII* and PSIId are photosystem II in the ground, excited and degraded/inactive state, respectively; OEC is the oxygen evolving complex. OECox is an intermediate formed during H2O oxidation that is inhibited by H2S. OEC:H2S is the inhibited form of this intermediate; SQR is the sulfide quinone oxidoreductase that couples the oxidation of sulfide to the reduction of the oxidized part of the plastoquinone pool (PQox), which yields zero-valent sulfur and reduced PQ (PQred). ‘ET’ is representative of any intermediate electron transport chain component between PQ and photosystem I (PSI) that serves as the electron acceptor for an unidentified sulfide oxidase (‘USO’). ‘ET’ could be cyt b6f, plastocyanin or cytochrome c553. The PSI reaction center can receive electrons from the reduced intermediate ‘ET’. In the alternative version of the model that does not involve ‘USO’, PQ directly reduces PSI. These electrons are used to reduce NADP+ to NADPH, which serves as the electron donor during CO2 fixation. Definitions of the process rates (k) are given in Table 2. Rates that were introduced to specifically explain the photosynthetic activity patterns in strain hensonii and that are not based on previously described models (Klatt , 2015b) are highlighted in bold (kD, kR, kPQ, kAP2, ). Details of the model are provided in the SOM.
Figure 2Maximum likelihood phylogenetic 16S rRNA gene tree of closely related Cyanobacteria and Leptolyngbya sp. strain hensonii. Accession numbers are provided in parentheses. Circles represent bootstrap support values >85 based on 1000 bootstrap samplings.
Statistics for the Leptolyngbya sp. strain hensonii draft genome
| Scaffolds | 77 |
| Longest scaffold (bp) | 544 817 |
|
| |
| Total bp | 5 940 030 |
| N50 (bp) | 137 782 |
|
| |
| G+C | 52.32 |
| tRNA | 61 |
| Protein coding genes | 5627 |
Figure 3Inorganic carbon assimilation by Leptolyngbya sp. strain hensonii. Error bars obtained from triplicate measurements.
Figure 4Example of the light-induced dynamics of total sulfide concentration (a) based on which volumetric GOP and GAP (b and c) were calculated. In (a) dark intervals are indicated by the dark shaded area. All measurements were performed in the uppermost layer of three different strain hensonii samples in the absence (a and b) and presence (c) of DCMU. In the specific example shown in (a), sulfide was injected in the dark. Injections in (b and c) were done in the light (137 μmol photons m−2 s−1 incident irradiance) after determination of GOP in the absence of H2S. After injection (indicated by the arrows), GAP was monitored. The corresponding local H2S concentration over time is also shown. As the neutralized Na2S solution was injected at variable distance from the biofilm, H2S concentration in the biofilm increased at different rates. The decrease of H2S concentration was caused by a combination of outgassing, local pH modulation by photosynthesis in the biofilm and photosynthetic consumption of sulfide. In (b) inhibitory concentrations of H2S were reached immediately after injection of H2S close to the biofilm. In (c) rates of GAP increased slowly with H2S concentration until GAPmax was reached. H2S concentrations >~44 μM led to inhibition of GAP (compare to Figure 5). Upon decrease of H2S, rates of GAP instantaneously recovered and only decreased again upon H2S limitation. All rates were converted to photosynthetic electron transport rates.
Figure 5Volumetric gross rates of anoxygenic photosynthesis dependent on H2S concentration measured at 36 and 137 μmol photons m−2 s−1 in the absence and presence of DCMU. The values are normalized to the maximum electron transport rate of oxygenic photosynthesis at the optimal irradiance 137 μmol photons m−2 s−1 (GOPmax, measured before the injection of sulfide; Figure 4). The dotted horizontal gray lines indicate the light-dependent maximum rate of GAP at optimal H2S concentration (GAPmax). The solid and dashed gray lines represent the output of the model that does not consider the presence of an ‘USO’, but light-dependent changes of SQR activity as described by Figure 1 and in Table 2. The black lines are the output of the model built on the assumption of an ‘USO’.
Definition of the rate laws governing the redox reactions shown in Figure 1
|
|
|
|---|---|
|
| The rate of generation of an excited catalytic Chlorophyll |
|
| The rate of PQ reduction by PSII, that is, the rate of oxygenic photosynthetic electron transport. It depends on the availability of the excited catalytic Chl |
|
| The rate of O2 release from the OEC, which depends on the availability of oxidized OEC (OECox) |
|
| The rate of PSII degradation by photoinhibition. It depends on the availability of the excited catalytic Chl |
|
| The rate of repair of the partially degraded, non-active PSII (PSIId) |
|
| The rate of OECox inhibition by H2S. This rate depends on the availability of the intermediate formed during OEC oxidation (OECox) and yields OEC:H2S, which refers to H2S being bound to OECox |
|
| The rate of OECox release from OECox:H2S, that is, the rate of deinhibition |
|
| The rate of H2S oxidation coupled to PQox reduction by SQR, that is, the rate of anoxygenic photosynthetic electron transport. This process results in the formation of zero-valent sulfur and PQred |
|
| Assuming that a hypothetical additional sulfide-oxidizing enzyme (see ‘USO’ in |
|
| Assuming that the activity of SQR is directly regulated by the light intensity the maximum rate of H2S oxidation this rate is |
|
| The rate of H2S oxidation coupled to the reduction of another electron transport chain component (‘EC’), such as oxidized cytochrome |
|
| The rate of PQred oxidation coupled to the reduction of any electron transport chain component (‘EC’). This process results in the reformation of PQox, which is available again for the reduction by SQR or PSII |
|
| The rate of NADP+ reduction coupled to the oxidation of the unidentified electron transport component ‘EC’. This rate depends on the availability of reduced ‘EC’, NADP+, irradiance ( |
|
| The rate of CO2 fixation coupled to NADPH oxidation, which depends on the maximum rate of CO2 reduction ( |
Figure 6Recovery of the volumetric GOP after the depletion of H2S by strain hensonii (at time point 0 h) during exposure to 23 (triangles) and 137 (squares) μmol photons m−2 s−1. The black lines represent the output of the simulation of the experimental data based on the model described in Figure 1 and in Table 2.
Figure 7Volumetric GOP with lines representing the results of the model described by Figure 1 and in Table 2. The resultant photosynthesis-over-irradiance-curves (PI-curve) for GOP is divided into operational irradiance ranges based on the plausible rate-limiting steps of oxygenic photosynthetic electron transport. The experimental data were fitted with the model of Eilers and Peeters (1988) for PI-curves by nonlinear regression (data not shown) to determine the optimal light intensity (137 μmol photons m−2 s−1) and the biomass-dependent GOP at this optimal light intensity (GOPmax). Normalization of all rates from each separate measurement to GOPmax revealed that the activity relative to GOPmax was highly reproducible and independent of the biomass in the surface layer. For GOP, the average of replicate measurements in each biofilm sample is shown (n=3–7; error bars are standard deviation). Values for GAP shown here are the average maximum rates at optimal H2S concentration (GAPmax, see Figure 5) in the presence and absence of DCMU (n=4).
Figure 8Simulation of irradiance and H2S dynamics and the corresponding photosynthetic activity over a diel cycle in the upper layer of a Leptolyngbya sp. strain hensonii-dominated microbial mat, using the model described in Figure 1 and Table 2.