Raphael Okoué1, Daniela Calabrese2, Pascal Nzé1, Simon Msika2, Hawa Keita3,4. 1. Service d'Anesthésie, CHU Louis Mourier, AP-HP, Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, 178 rue des Renouillers, 92700, Colombes, France. 2. Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Générale, CHU Louis Mourier, AP-HP, Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, 178 rue des Renouillers, 92700, Colombes, France. 3. Service d'Anesthésie, CHU Louis Mourier, AP-HP, Université Paris 7, Denis Diderot PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, 178 rue des Renouillers, 92700, Colombes, France. hawa.keita@aphp.fr. 4. EA Recherche Clinique coordonnée ville-hôpital, Méthodologies et Société (REMES), Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75010, Paris, France. hawa.keita@aphp.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypothermia is associated with an increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Forced-air warming systems are the most effective methods for its prevention. When using a mattress, a reduction in the area of diffusion of warm air by crushing due to excess weight cannot be ruled out. METHODS: We designed a prospective study to compare the efficacy of a forced-air warming mattress (Bair Hugger® 585) to prevent hypothermia (core temperature (CT°) < 36 °C) in morbidly obese (group MO, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2) and non-obese patients (group NO, BMI < 30 kg/m2). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in group MO (84% bariatric surgery, 96% laparoscopic procedures) and 32 in group NO (37.5% cholecystectomy, 62.5% laparoscopic procedures). The incidence of hypothermia was not different between the two groups 1 h after induction (H1) and at extubation: 22 vs 19% (not significant (NS)) and 23 vs 19% (NS) for the group MO versus group NO. At H1, the mean CT° was not different: 36.3 ± 0.4 °C vs 36.4 ± 0.5 °C (NS), group MO versus group NO. No patient presented severe hypothermia (CT° < 34.9 °C). Dysfunction of the forced-air warming mattress was observed for eight patients (31%) in group MO but for none in group NO. CONCLUSION: The forced-air warming mattress is effective in preventing hypothermia in MO patients. However, excess weight is associated with frequent dysfunction of the system, which does not make it a practical system in a context of MO.
BACKGROUND:Hypothermia is associated with an increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. Forced-air warming systems are the most effective methods for its prevention. When using a mattress, a reduction in the area of diffusion of warm air by crushing due to excess weight cannot be ruled out. METHODS: We designed a prospective study to compare the efficacy of a forced-air warming mattress (Bair Hugger® 585) to prevent hypothermia (core temperature (CT°) < 36 °C) in morbidly obese (group MO, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2) and non-obesepatients (group NO, BMI < 30 kg/m2). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included in group MO (84% bariatric surgery, 96% laparoscopic procedures) and 32 in group NO (37.5% cholecystectomy, 62.5% laparoscopic procedures). The incidence of hypothermia was not different between the two groups 1 h after induction (H1) and at extubation: 22 vs 19% (not significant (NS)) and 23 vs 19% (NS) for the group MO versus group NO. At H1, the mean CT° was not different: 36.3 ± 0.4 °C vs 36.4 ± 0.5 °C (NS), group MO versus group NO. No patient presented severe hypothermia (CT° < 34.9 °C). Dysfunction of the forced-air warming mattress was observed for eight patients (31%) in group MO but for none in group NO. CONCLUSION: The forced-air warming mattress is effective in preventing hypothermia in MO patients. However, excess weight is associated with frequent dysfunction of the system, which does not make it a practical system in a context of MO.