Michelle H Lim1, John F M Gleeson2, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez3,4, David L Penn2,5. 1. Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, 3122, Australia. mlim@swin.edu.au. 2. School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 4. Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the review is to understand the relationships between loneliness and related psychological and social factors in individuals with psychosis. Loneliness is poorly understood in people with psychosis. Given the myriad of social challenges facing individuals with psychosis, these findings can inform psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in this vulnerable group. METHODS: We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and systematically reviewed empirical studies that measured loneliness either as a main outcome or as an associated variable in individuals with psychosis. RESULTS: A total of ten studies examining loneliness in people diagnosed with a psychotic disorder were examined. Heterogeneity in the assessment of loneliness was found, and there were contradictory findings on the relationship between loneliness and psychotic symptomatology. In individuals with psychosis, loneliness may be influenced by psychological and social factors such as increased depression, psychosis, and anxiety, poor social support, poor quality of life, more severe internalised stigma and perceived discrimination, and low self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between loneliness and psychosis remains poorly understood due to a lack of rigorous studies. Although having strong social relationships is crucial to facilitate recovery from serious mental illness, psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in individuals with psychosis are lacking and sorely needed. Interventions targeting loneliness in those with psychosis will also need to account for additional barriers associated with psychosis (e.g., social skill deficits, impoverished social networks, and negative symptoms).
PURPOSE: The aim of the review is to understand the relationships between loneliness and related psychological and social factors in individuals with psychosis. Loneliness is poorly understood in people with psychosis. Given the myriad of social challenges facing individuals with psychosis, these findings can inform psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in this vulnerable group. METHODS: We adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and systematically reviewed empirical studies that measured loneliness either as a main outcome or as an associated variable in individuals with psychosis. RESULTS: A total of ten studies examining loneliness in people diagnosed with a psychotic disorder were examined. Heterogeneity in the assessment of loneliness was found, and there were contradictory findings on the relationship between loneliness and psychotic symptomatology. In individuals with psychosis, loneliness may be influenced by psychological and social factors such as increased depression, psychosis, and anxiety, poor social support, poor quality of life, more severe internalised stigma and perceived discrimination, and low self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between loneliness and psychosis remains poorly understood due to a lack of rigorous studies. Although having strong social relationships is crucial to facilitate recovery from serious mental illness, psychosocial interventions that specifically target loneliness in individuals with psychosis are lacking and sorely needed. Interventions targeting loneliness in those with psychosis will also need to account for additional barriers associated with psychosis (e.g., social skill deficits, impoverished social networks, and negative symptoms).
Entities:
Keywords:
Loneliness; Perceived social isolation; Psychosis; Systematic review
Authors: Helen J Stain; Cherrie A Galletly; Scott Clark; Jacqueline Wilson; Emily A Killen; Lauren Anthes; Linda E Campbell; Mary-Claire Hanlon; Carol Harvey Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Iris B Mauss; Amanda J Shallcross; Allison S Troy; Oliver P John; Emilio Ferrer; Frank H Wilhelm; James J Gross Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol Date: 2011-04
Authors: Victoria Bird; Mary Leamy; Jerry Tew; Clair Le Boutillier; Julie Williams; Mike Slade Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Briana L Robustelli; Sarah B Campbell; Preston A Greene; George G Sayre; Nadiyah Sulayman; Katherine D Hoerster Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2021-09-13
Authors: Joseph S DeLuca; Nicole D Andorko; Doha Chibani; Samantha Y Jay; Pamela J Rakhshan Rouhakhtar; Emily Petti; Mallory J Klaunig; Elizabeth C Thompson; Zachary B Millman; Kathleen M Connors; LeeAnn Akouri-Shan; John Fitzgerald; Samantha L Redman; Caroline Roemer; Miranda A Bridgwater; Jordan E DeVylder; Cheryl A King; Steven C Pitts; Shauna P Reinblatt; Heidi J Wehring; Kristin L Bussell; Natalee Solomon; Sarah M Edwards; Gloria M Reeves; Robert W Buchanan; Jason Schiffman Journal: J Psychother Integr Date: 2020-06
Authors: Kelsey A Ludwig; Lana N Nye; Grace L Simmons; Lars F Jarskog; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey; David L Penn Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-10-30 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Daniel Fulford; Jasmine Mote; Rachel Gonzalez; Samuel Abplanalp; Yuting Zhang; Jarrod Luckenbaugh; Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Carlos Busso; David E Gard Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: James K Moran; Joachim Bretz; Johanna Winkler; Stefan Gutwinski; Eva J Brandl; Meryam Schouler-Ocak Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 5.435