Literature DB >> 29326836

Minimally Invasive Epicardial Surgical Ablation Alone Versus Hybrid Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Charles M Pearman1,2, Shi S Poon1, Laura J Bonnett3, Shouvik Haldar4, Tom Wong4, Neeraj Mediratta5, Dhiraj Gupta1.   

Abstract

Maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with non-paroxysmal AF is an elusive goal. Some suggest that hybrid ablation, combining minimally invasive epicardial surgical ablation with endocardial catheter ablation, may be more effective than either modality alone. However, randomised trials are lacking. We investigated whether hybrid ablation is more effective than epicardial ablation alone at preventing recurrent AF by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016043389). MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies of standalone minimally invasive epicardial ablation of AF and/or hybrid ablation, identifying 41 non-overlapping studies comprising 2737 patients. A random-effects meta-analysis, meta-regression and sensitivity analysis were performed. Single-procedure survival free from atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drugs was similar between epicardial-alone and hybrid approaches at 12 months (epicardial alone 71.5 %; [95 % CI 66.1-76.9], hybrid 63.2 %; [95 % CI 51.5-75.0]) and 24 months (epicardial alone 68.5 %; [95 % CI 57.7-79.3], hybrid 57.0 %; [95 % CI 33.6-80.4]). Freedom from atrial arrhythmias with AADs and rates of unplanned additional catheter ablations were also similar between groups. Major complications occurred more often with hybrid ablation (epicardial alone 2.9 %; [95 % CI 1.9-3.9], hybrid 7.3 %; [95 % CI 4.2-10.5]). Meta-regression suggested that bipolar radiofrequency energy and thoracoscopic access were associated with greater efficacy, but adjusting for these factors did not unmask any difference between epicardial-alone and hybrid ablation. Hybrid and epicardial ablation alone appear to be equally effective treatments for AF, although hybrid ablation may be associated with higher complication rates. These data derived from observational studies should be verified with randomised data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; ablation; complications; convergent; hybrid; minimally invasive; monopolar; surgical; trans-diaphragmatic

Year:  2017        PMID: 29326836      PMCID: PMC5739900          DOI: 10.15420/aer/2017.29.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev        ISSN: 2050-3369


  28 in total

1.  Epicardial and endocardial electrophysiological guided thoracoscopic surgery for atrial fibrillation: a multidisciplinary approach of atrial fibrillation ablation in challenging patients.

Authors:  Sébastien P J Krul; Laurent Pison; Mark La Meir; Antoine H G Driessen; Arthur A M Wilde; Jos G Maessen; Bas A J M De Mol; Harry J G M Crijns; Joris R de Groot
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Evgeny Pokushalov; Alexander Romanov; Dmitry Elesin; Alexander Bogachev-Prokophiev; Denis Losik; Sevda Bairamova; Alexander Karaskov; Jonathan S Steinberg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-09

3.  Ganglion Plexus Ablation in Advanced Atrial Fibrillation: The AFACT Study.

Authors:  Antoine H G Driessen; Wouter R Berger; Sébastien P J Krul; Nicoline W E van den Berg; Jolien Neefs; Femke R Piersma; Dean R P P Chan Pin Yin; Jonas S S G de Jong; WimJan P van Boven; Joris R de Groot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Systematic classification of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J E Seely; Jelena Ivanovic; Jennifer Threader; Ahmed Al-Hussaini; Derar Al-Shehab; Tim Ramsay; Sebastian Gilbert; Donna E Maziak; Farid M Shamji; R Sudhir Sundaresan
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation on treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized, controlled short-term trial.

Authors:  Shizhong Wang; Liqun Liu; Chengwei Zou
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 6.  Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anthony G Brooks; Martin K Stiles; Julien Laborderie; Dennis H Lau; Pawel Kuklik; Nicholas J Shipp; Li-Fern Hsu; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Importance of evaluating conduction block in radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Borut Gersak; Andy C Kiser; Krzysztof Bartus; Jerzy Sadowski; Wolfgang Harringer; Michael Knaut; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker; Andrej Pernat
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  European experience of the convergent atrial fibrillation procedure: multicenter outcomes in consecutive patients.

Authors:  Borut Geršak; Michael O Zembala; Dirk Müller; Thierry Folliguet; Matevz Jan; Oskar Kowalski; Stefan Erler; Clement Bars; Boris Robic; Krzysztof Filipiak; Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Sequential hybrid procedure for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Alan Bulava; Ales Mokracek; Jiri Hanis; Vojtech Kurfirst; Martin Eisenberger; Ladislav Pesl
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  5 in total

1.  Authors' Reply: Hybrid Approach for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: the Jury is Still Out.

Authors:  Charles M Pearman; Dhiraj Gupta
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-03

2.  Hybrid Approach for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: the Jury is Still Out.

Authors:  Georgios Giannopoulos; Spyridon Deftereos
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-03

Review 3.  The Impact of Advances in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Devices on the Incidence and Prevention of Complications.

Authors:  Fehmi Keçe; Katja Zeppenfeld; Serge A Trines
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Early experience of thoracoscopic vs. catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Charles M Pearman; James Redfern; Emmanuel A Williams; Richard L Snowdon; Paul Modi; Mark C S Hall; Simon Modi; Johan E P Waktare; Saagar Mahida; Derick M Todd; Neeraj Mediratta; Dhiraj Gupta
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.214

5.  Hybrid convergent ablation versus endocardial catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Mhanna; Azizullah Beran; Ahmad Al-Abdouh; Hazem Ayesh; Omar Sajdeya; Omar Srour; Mahmoud Alsaiqali; Odai H Alhasanat; Cameron Burmeister; Abdelrhman M Abumoawad; Paul Chacko
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-11-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.