| Literature DB >> 29326822 |
Shaimaa Elzamly1, Santosh Chavali2, Vijay Tonk2, Sahil Tonk2, Sumit Gaur3, Darlene Tarango4, Alireza Torabi4.
Abstract
Chromosomal rearrangement involving the KMT2A gene is one of the most common genetic alteration in acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 135 different KMT2A rearrangements have been identified, where 94 translocation partner genes are now characterized at the molecular level. Of these 94 translocation partner genes, 35 translocation partner genes occur recurrently, but only 9 specific gene fusions account for more than 90% of cases. Translocation of KMT2A with SEPT5 gene at 22q11.2 is rare, with few reported cases in the literature. In this report, we are presenting a case of KMT2A-SEPT5 fusion in de novo acute myeloid leukemia with t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) with a review of the literature.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; KMT2A; SEPT5
Year: 2018 PMID: 29326822 PMCID: PMC5758965 DOI: 10.1177/2050313X17750334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SAGE Open Med Case Rep ISSN: 2050-313X
Figure 1.Bone marrow biopsy shows myeloblast population, some with folded nuclei (arrow).
Figure 2.Flow cytometry analysis show 2 prominent populations in blast and monocyte gates (a). These 2 populations are negative for CD34 (b) and positive for CD33 (c). Blast population is positive for CD117 (b), and weakly for CD4 (d), and the monocytic population is positive for CD4 (d) and CD11b (e).
Figure 3.(a) Balanced translocation between the long arm of chromosome 11 and the long arm of chromosomes 22, with breakpoints at 11q23 and 22q11.2. (b) Metaphase FISH analysis confirmed that the 3′ end of KMT2A (red) has translocated to chromosome 22 and bind to SEPT5 (aqua), and part of SEPT5 (aqua) has fused to the 5′ end region (green) of KMT2A on the derivative 11.
All the reported cases of AML with KMT2A-SEPT5 fusion.
| Reference | Age/sex | Diagnosis (FAB) | Karyotype | Prognosis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current case | 43/F | AML-M4 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Positive |
| OS: 2 months |
| Gao et al.[ | 32/M | AML-M2 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Positive | ND | OS: 7 months |
| Megonigal et al.[ | 11.5 months/F | AML-M2 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Positive | ND | NR |
| Megonigal et al.[ | 13 months/F | AML-M1 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Positive | ND | NR |
| Launay et al.[ | 23 months/F | AML-M5 | t(11;22)(q23;q11) | Positive | MLL- | Survived >2 years after allograft |
| Tatsumi et al.[ | 39/M | AML-M2 | t(11;22)(q23;q11) | Positive | OS: 12 months | |
| Wang et al.[ | Not available | AML-M2 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Not available | Not available | CR after induction but died during the consolidation therapy |
| Wang et al.[ | Not available | AML-M5 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Not available | Not available | CR by induction chemo |
| Wang et al.[ | 21/M | AML-M1 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | Positive | ND | CR by induction chemo and BM transplant. In remission to date. |
| Wang et al.[ | 22/F | AML-M4 | t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) | NR | ND | NR |
AML: acute myeloid leukemia; CR: complete remission; FISH: fluorescent in situ hybridization; ND: not done; NR: not recorded; OS: over all survival.