| Literature DB >> 29326732 |
Xiao Yang1, Xiaoxian Cui2,3, Li Zhao1, Doudou Guo1, Lei Feng4, Shiwei Wei5, Chao Zhao2,6, Danfeng Huang1.
Abstract
Glycine, the simplest amino acid in nature and one of the most abundant free amino acids in soil, is regarded as a model nutrient in organic nitrogen studies. To date, many studies have focused on the uptake, metabolism and distribution of organic nitrogen in plants, but few have investigated the nutritional performance of plants supplied with organic nitrogen. Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), one of the most widely consumed leafy vegetables worldwide, is a significant source of antioxidants and bioactive compounds such as polyphenols, ascorbic acid and tocopherols. In this study, two lettuce cultivars, Shenxuan 1 and Lollo Rossa, were hydroponically cultured in media containing 4.5, 9, or 18 mM glycine or 9 mM nitrate (control) for 4 weeks, and the levels of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of the lettuce leaf extracts were evaluated. Glycine significantly reduced fresh weight compared to control lettuce, while 9 mM glycine significantly increased fresh weight compared to 4.5 or 18 mM glycine. Compared to controls, glycine (18 mM for Shenxuan 1; 9 mM for Lollo Rossa) significantly increased the levels of most antioxidants (including total polyphenols, α-tocopherol) and antioxidant activity, suggesting appropriate glycine supply promotes antioxidant accumulation and activity. Glycine induced most glycosylated quercetin derivatives and luteolin derivatives detected and decreased some phenolic acids compared to nitrate treatment. This study indicates exogenous glycine supplementation could be used strategically to promote the accumulation of health-promoting compounds and antioxidant activity of hydroponically grown lettuce, which could potentially improve human nutrition.Entities:
Keywords: H2O2 scavenging capability; ascorbic acid; luteolin; nitrate; organic nitrogen; quercetin
Year: 2017 PMID: 29326732 PMCID: PMC5737139 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1The greenhouse hydroponic apparatus and mesh pot net baskets used to cultivate lettuce.
Plant fresh and dry weights and total anthocyanin contents of lettuce cultivated in hydroponic solution containing nitrate or glycine.
| 9Nit | 55.90 ± 4.72a | 47.70 ± 5.31a | n.d. | 43.47 ± 3.72a | 35.35 ± 2.88a | 6.88 ± 0.81c |
| 4.5Gly | 17.98 ± 2.51c | 13.85 ± 2.48c | n.d. | 16.55 ± 1.51c | 12.95 ± 1.82c | 10.33 ± 1.21b |
| 9Gly | 23.46 ± 1.48b | 19.90 ± 1.51b | n.d. | 20.88 ± 2.29b | 18.26 ± 2.33b | 10.61 ± 0.99b |
| 18Gly | 14.85 ± 1.05c | 11.43 ± 1.94c | n.d. | 12.96 ± 1.08c | 11.35 ± 1.02c | 34.72 ± 2.01a |
For fresh weight analysis, values are means ± SD (n = 4); for total anthocyanidin content, values are mean ± SD (n = 100); Value with different letters are significantly different; p < 0.05, LSD analysis.
n.d. represents not detected.
Figure 2Effect of glycine and nitrate supply on the contents of bioactive compounds in lettuce leaf extracts. (A) Total polyphenol content; (B) ascorbic acid content; (C) α-tocopherol content; (D) γ-tocopherol content. Different small letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05; LSD analysis (n = 3). The “*” (p < 0.05) and “**” (p < 0.01) indicate significance differences between cultivars (t-test).
Metabolites putatively identified by UHPLC-IMS-QTOF-MS in the leaf extracts of nitrate- and glycine-treated lettuce.
| 1 | Dihydrocaffeic acid hexose isomer 1 | 344.11073 | 343.1033 | −0.2 | 1.82 | 181.05045(100);163.04019(52);135.04524(28) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 2 | Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside isomer 1 | 316.07943 | 315.0723 | 0.2 | 1.87 | 152.01166(33);153.01921(23); 108.02183(21);109.02906(11) | Ammar et al., |
| 3 | Dihydrocaffeic acid sulfate | 262.01472 | 261.0073 | −0.2 | 1.96 | 181.05084(100);163.04070(87);135.04620(75) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 4 | Dihydroxybenzoic acid hexoside isomer 2 | 316.07943 | 315.0721 | 0.0 | 2.02 | 153.01956(50);109.02965(18) | Ammar et al., |
| 5 | Syringic acid hexose | 360.10565 | 359.0984 | 0.0 | 2.13 | 182.02196(100);197.04479(49) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 6 | Esculetin hexoside | 340.07943 | 339.0717 | −0.5 | 2.33 | 177.01914(100);133.02890(10) | Ammar et al., |
| 7 | Quercetin-hexoside-glucuronide | 640.12756 | 639.1207 | 0.4 | 2.45 | 463.08834(100);301.03547(20) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 8 | Dihydrocaffeic acid hexose isomer 2 | 344.11073 | 343.1032 | −0.2 | 2.49 | 181.05038(100);137.06112(81) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 9 | Caffeoyl hexose | 342.09508 | 341.0878 | 0.0 | 2.52 | 135.04502(100);179.03470(36) | Amessis Ouchemoukh et al., |
| 10 | Caffeoylquinic acid isomer 1 | 354.09508 | 353.0879 | 0.1 | 2.52 | 191.05594(100);135.04502(13) | Clifford et al., |
| 11 | Quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-malonyl)-glucoside 7-O-glucuronide | 726.12796 | 725.1187 | −2.0 | 2.60 | 505.09931(100);681.13135(26);301.03416(21) | Llorach et al., |
| 12 | Quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-malonyl)-glucoside 7-O-glucoside | 712.14869 | 711.1407 | −0.7 | 2.67 | 505.09860(49);462.08120(23);301.03539(23) | Llorach et al., |
| 13 | Ferulic acid methyl ester | 208.07356 | 207.0651 | −1.2 | 2.69 | 192.04259(100);177.01972(65) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 14 | Ferulic acid glucoside | 356.11073 | 355.1029 | −0.6 | 2.77 | 193.05083(100) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 15 | Caffeoylquinic acid isomer 2 | 354.09508 | 353.088 | 0.2 | 2.83 | 191.05575(100) | Clifford et al., |
| 16 | p-coumaroylquinic acid | 338.10017 | 337.0931 | 0.2 | 3.20 | 191.05545(100) | Clifford et al., |
| 17 | Luteolin diglucoside | 610.15338 | 609.1459 | −0.2 | 3.17 | 285.04098(100) | Marques et al., |
| 18 | Rutin | 610.15338 | 609.1459 | −0.2 | 3.17 | 301.03423(35) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 19 | Chicoric acid | 474.07983 | 473.0725 | −0.1 | 3.31 | 135.04460(91);149.00862(48); 179.03440(100);293.02990(88) | Standard |
| 20 | Luteolin 7-rutinoside | 594.15847 | 593.1511 | 0.0 | 3.48 | 285.04018(100) | Llorach et al., |
| 21 | Quercetin 3-glucuronide | 478.07474 | 477.0678 | 0.3 | 3.52 | 301.03501(100) | Llorach et al., |
| 22 | Quercetin glucoside | 464.09548 | 463.0883 | 0.1 | 3.56 | 300.02702(100);271.02465(80);255.02969(52) | Standard |
| 23 | Luteolin 7-glucuronide | 462.07983 | 461.0721 | −0.5 | 3.59 | 285.04025(100) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 24 | Luteolin 7-O-glucoside | 448.10056 | 447.0927 | −0.6 | 3.63 | 284.03218(76) | Standard |
| 25 | 3,4,7-Trihydroxy-5-methoxy-8-prenylflavan 7-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside isomer 1 | 534.21011 | 533.2031 | 0.3 | 3.64 | 473.18194(100);491.19196(60) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 26 | Isorhamnetin-3-O-glucoside | 478.11113 | 477.1039 | 0.1 | 3.76 | 243.02975(100);299.01988(80) | Schieber et al., |
| 27 | Apigenin 7-O-glucuronide | 446.08491 | 445.0773 | −0.3 | 3.76 | 271.02448(100) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 28 | Quercetin glucose acetate isomer 1 | 506.10604 | 505.0988 | 0.1 | 3.77 | 300.02729(100);255.02978(29) | ResPect MS/MS |
| 29 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 516.12678 | 515.1201 | 0.6 | 3.93 | 191.05593(100);353.08798(50) | Clifford et al., |
| 30 | Quercetin glucose acetate isomer 2 | 506.10604 | 505.0993 | 0.5 | 3.94 | 300.02747(100) | ResPect MS/MS |
| 31 | Apigenin 7-O-glucoside | 432.10565 | 431.0994 | 1.0 | 4.24 | 268.03731(100) | ResPect MS/MS |
| 32 | Syringaresinol glucoside | 580.21559 | 579.2094 | 1.1 | 4.31 | 417.15576(100) | Sun et al., |
| 33 | 3,4,7-Trihydroxy-5-methoxy-8-prenylflavan 7-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside isomer 2 | 534.21011 | 533.2026 | −0.3 | 4.79 | 491.19208(100);473.18232(90);503.19246(77) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 34 | Hydroxybenzoyl dihydroxybenzoyl hexose | 436.10056 | 435.0934 | 0.2 | 5.65 | 297.06184(21);315.07121(20) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
| 35 | Tri-4-hydroxyphenylacetyl glucoside | 582.17373 | 581.1662 | −0.2 | 6.04 | 175.03999(100) | Abu-Reidah et al., |
RT, Retention time.
5-Caffeoylquinic acid and 3-caffeoylquinic acid were the major forms.
3,5-Di-O-caffeoylquinic acid was reported as the major form.
Figure 3Effect of glycine and nitrate supply on the composition and concentrations of polyphenols in lettuce leaf extracts. Relative abundance of metabolites is indicated from red (high) to green (low). The dotted lines in the metabolic pathway represent possible relationships that have not yet been proven experimentally and solid lines indicate pathways in the KEGG or PlantCyc databases.
Figure 4Effects of nitrate and glycine supply on the relative ratios of phenolic acid derivatives in lettuce leaf extracts. Different small letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) and “ns” indicates non-significant differences (p ≥ 0.05; LSD analysis, n = 3).
Figure 5Effects of nitrate and glycine supply on the relative ratios of flavonoid derivatives in lettuce leaf extracts. Different small letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) and “ns” indicates non-significant differences (p ≥ 0.05; LSD analysis, n = 3). Q-3-O-(6″-O-M)-G-7-O-G, quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-malonyl)-glucoside 7-O-glucoside; Q-3-O-(6″-O-M)-G-7-O-GN, quercetin 3-O-(6″-O-malonyl)-glucoside 7-O-glucuronide; 3,4,7-T-M-P-G isomer 1, 3,4,7-trihydroxy-5-methoxy-8-prenylflavan 7-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside isomer 1; and 3,4,7-T-M-P-G isomer 2, 3,4,7-trihydroxy-5-methoxy-8-prenylflavan 7-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside isomer 2.
Figure 6Effect of glycine or nitrate supply on the antioxidant activity of lettuce leaf extracts. (A) FRAP assay. (B) CAA assay. (C) Cytotoxicity assay. Different small letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05; LSD analysis (n = 3). The “*” (p < 0.05) and “**” (p < 0.01) indicate significant differences between cultivars (t-test).
Figure 7Effect of glycine or nitrate supply on the H2O2 scavenging ability of lettuce leaf extracts in the CCK-8 assay. Different small letters indicate significant differences, p < 0.05; LSD analysis (n = 3).
Figure 8Correlation coefficients (r) for the relationships between total antioxidant capacity and total polyphenols and individual polyphenols in the leaves of lettuce hydroponically cultivated in media containing glycine or nitrate. **p < 0.01 and *0.01 < p < 0.05; two-tailed test.