Rupali S Avasare1, Pietro A Canetta2, Andrew S Bomback2, Maddalena Marasa2, Yasar Caliskan3, Yasemin Ozluk4, Yifu Li2, Ali G Gharavi2, Gerald B Appel2. 1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon; avasare@ohsu.edu. 2. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and. 3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine and. 4. Department of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: C3 glomerulopathy is a form of complement-mediated GN. Immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of C3 glomerulopathy. Mycophenolate mofetil is an attractive treatment option given its role in the treatment of other complement-mediated diseases and the results of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases C3 Study. Here, we study the outcomes of patients with C3 glomerulopathy treated with steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients in the C3 glomerulopathy registry at Columbia University and identified patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil for at least 3 months and follow-up for at least 1 year. We studied clinical, histologic, and genetic data for the whole group and compared data for those who achieved complete or partial remission (responders) with those who did not achieve remission (nonresponders). We compared remission with mycophenolate mofetil with remission with other immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: We identified 30 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 25 years old (interquartile range, 18-36), median creatinine was 1.07 mg/dl (interquartile range, 0.79-1.69), and median proteinuria was 3200 mg/g creatinine (interquartile range, 1720-6759). The median follow-up time was 32 months (interquartile range, 21-68). Twenty (67%) patients were classified as responders. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between responders and nonresponders, although initial proteinuria was lower (median 2468 mg/g creatinine) in responders compared with nonresponders (median 5000 mg/g creatinine) and soluble membrane attack complex levels were higher in responders compared with nonresponders. For those tapered off mycophenolate mofetil, relapse rate was 50%. Genome-wide analysis on complement genes was done, and in 12 patients, we found 18 variants predicted to be damaging. None of these variants were previously reported to be pathogenic. Mycophenolate mofetil with steroids outperformed other immunosuppressive regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who tolerated mycophenolate mofetil, combination therapy with steroids induced remission in 67% of this cohort. Heavier proteinuria at the start of therapy and lower soluble membrane attack complex levels were associated with treatment resistance.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:C3 glomerulopathy is a form of complement-mediated GN. Immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial in the treatment of C3 glomerulopathy. Mycophenolate mofetil is an attractive treatment option given its role in the treatment of other complement-mediated diseases and the results of the Spanish Group for the Study of Glomerular Diseases C3 Study. Here, we study the outcomes of patients with C3 glomerulopathy treated with steroids and mycophenolate mofetil. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients in the C3 glomerulopathy registry at Columbia University and identified patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil for at least 3 months and follow-up for at least 1 year. We studied clinical, histologic, and genetic data for the whole group and compared data for those who achieved complete or partial remission (responders) with those who did not achieve remission (nonresponders). We compared remission with mycophenolate mofetil with remission with other immunosuppressive regimens. RESULTS: We identified 30 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 25 years old (interquartile range, 18-36), median creatinine was 1.07 mg/dl (interquartile range, 0.79-1.69), and median proteinuria was 3200 mg/g creatinine (interquartile range, 1720-6759). The median follow-up time was 32 months (interquartile range, 21-68). Twenty (67%) patients were classified as responders. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between responders and nonresponders, although initial proteinuria was lower (median 2468 mg/g creatinine) in responders compared with nonresponders (median 5000 mg/g creatinine) and soluble membrane attack complex levels were higher in responders compared with nonresponders. For those tapered off mycophenolate mofetil, relapse rate was 50%. Genome-wide analysis on complement genes was done, and in 12 patients, we found 18 variants predicted to be damaging. None of these variants were previously reported to be pathogenic. Mycophenolate mofetil with steroids outperformed other immunosuppressive regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who tolerated mycophenolate mofetil, combination therapy with steroids induced remission in 67% of this cohort. Heavier proteinuria at the start of therapy and lower soluble membrane attack complex levels were associated with treatment resistance.
Authors: Andrew S Bomback; Richard J Smith; Gaetano R Barile; Yuzhou Zhang; Eliot C Heher; Leal Herlitz; M Barry Stokes; Glen S Markowitz; Vivette D D'Agati; Pietro A Canetta; Jai Radhakrishnan; Gerald B Appel Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Jean Hou; Glen S Markowitz; Andrew S Bomback; Gerald B Appel; Leal C Herlitz; M Barry Stokes; Vivette D D'Agati Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2013-09-25 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Nicholas R Medjeral-Thomas; Michelle M O'Shaughnessy; John A O'Regan; Carol Traynor; Michael Flanagan; Limy Wong; Chia Wei Teoh; Atif Awan; Mary Waldron; Tom Cairns; Patrick O'Kelly; Anthony M Dorman; Matthew C Pickering; Peter J Conlon; H Terence Cook Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Rubén Martínez-Barricarte; Meike Heurich; Francisco Valdes-Cañedo; Eduardo Vazquez-Martul; Eva Torreira; Tamara Montes; Agustín Tortajada; Sheila Pinto; Margarita Lopez-Trascasa; B Paul Morgan; Oscar Llorca; Claire L Harris; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: David Kavanagh; Elizabeth J Kemp; Elizabeth Mayland; Robin J Winney; Jeremy S Duffield; Graham Warwick; Anna Richards; Roy Ward; Judith A Goodship; Timothy H J Goodship Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2005-05-25 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Cristina Rabasco; Teresa Cavero; Elena Román; Jorge Rojas-Rivera; Teresa Olea; Mario Espinosa; Virginia Cabello; Gema Fernández-Juarez; Fayna González; Ana Ávila; José María Baltar; Montserrat Díaz; Raquel Alegre; Sandra Elías; Monserrat Antón; Miguel Angel Frutos; Alfonso Pobes; Miguel Blasco; Francisco Martín; Carmen Bernis; Manuel Macías; Sergio Barroso; Alberto de Lorenzo; Gema Ariceta; Manuel López-Mendoza; Begoña Rivas; Katia López-Revuelta; José María Campistol; Santiago Mendizábal; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba; Manuel Praga Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Agustín Tortajada; Hugo Yébenes; Cynthia Abarrategui-Garrido; Jaouad Anter; Jesús M García-Fernández; Rubén Martínez-Barricarte; María Alba-Domínguez; Talat H Malik; Rafael Bedoya; Rocío Cabrera Pérez; Margarita López Trascasa; Matthew C Pickering; Claire L Harris; Pilar Sánchez-Corral; Oscar Llorca; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Richard J H Smith; Gerald B Appel; Anna M Blom; H Terence Cook; Vivette D D'Agati; Fadi Fakhouri; Véronique Fremeaux-Bacchi; Mihály Józsi; David Kavanagh; John D Lambris; Marina Noris; Matthew C Pickering; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Santiago Rodriguez de Córdoba; Sanjeev Sethi; Johan Van der Vlag; Peter F Zipfel; Carla M Nester Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Edwin K S Wong; Kevin J Marchbank; Hannah Lomax-Browne; Isabel Y Pappworth; Harriet Denton; Katie Cooke; Sophie Ward; Amy-Claire McLoughlin; Grant Richardson; Valerie Wilson; Claire L Harris; B Paul Morgan; Svetlana Hakobyan; Paul McAlinden; Daniel P Gale; Heather Maxwell; Martin Christian; Roger Malcomson; Timothy H J Goodship; Stephen D Marks; Matthew C Pickering; David Kavanagh; H Terence Cook; Sally A Johnson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Aishwarya Ravindran; Fernando C Fervenza; Richard J H Smith; An S De Vriese; Sanjeev Sethi Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Fernando Caravaca-Fontán; Montserrat M Díaz-Encarnación; Laura Lucientes; Teresa Cavero; Virginia Cabello; Gema Ariceta; Luis F Quintana; Helena Marco; Xoana Barros; Natalia Ramos; Nuria Rodríguez-Mendiola; Sonia Cruz; Gema Fernández-Juárez; Adela Rodríguez; Ana Pérez de José; Cristina Rabasco; Raquel Rodado; Loreto Fernández; Vanessa Pérez Gómez; Ana I Ávila; Luis Bravo; Javier Lumbreras; Natalia Allende; Maria Dolores Sanchez de la Nieta; Eva Rodríguez; Teresa Olea; Marta Melgosa; Ana Huerta; Rosa Miquel; Carmen Mon; Gloria Fraga; Alberto de Lorenzo; Juliana Draibe; Marta Cano-Megías; Fayna González; Amir Shabaka; Maria Esperanza López-Rubio; María Ángeles Fenollosa; Luis Martín-Penagos; Iara Da Silva; Juana Alonso Titos; Santiago Rodríguez de Córdoba; Elena Goicoechea de Jorge; Manuel Praga Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 8.237