Literature DB >> 29325859

Ki-67 Expression as a Factor Predicting Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nikiforita Poulakaki1, Georgios-Marios Makris2, Aristea-Maria Papanota1, Filio Marineli1, Alexandros Marinelis1, Marco-Johannes Battista3, Daniel Boehm4, Amanda Psyrri5, Theodoros N Sergentanis6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ki-67 is a marker of proliferating cells; in this meta-analysis we aimed to examine whether Ki-67 expression can predict recurrence rates of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible articles were sought in MEDLINE up to April 30, 2017. Random effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models were used for the calculation of pooled relative risk (RR) estimates; meta-regression analysis was also performed. Separate analyses were performed according to Ki-67 expression cutoff levels, invasiveness of recurrence, and adjustment of studies.
RESULTS: Ten eligible cohort studies were synthesized; a significant association between Ki-67 expression and DCIS recurrence was noted for the Ki-67 cutoff at 10% (RR = 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-2.42) as well as the Ki-67 cutoff at 14% (RR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.77). Subanalysis on unadjusted (RR = 1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.07) and adjusted studies (RR = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.42-3.38) replicated the statistically significant findings. Ki-67 expression predicted the risk of invasive (RR = 1.53; 95% CI, 1.14-2.06) and noninvasive (RR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.19-2.13) recurrence.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights Ki-67 expression as a predictor of DCIS recurrence; nevertheless, additional adjusted studies, with adequate follow-up periods, stemming from various world regions seem to be needed on this topic.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort studies; Invasiveness; Meta-regression analysis; Prognosis; Relative risk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29325859     DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.

Authors:  Vidya C Sinha; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Subtype-Specific Tumour Immune Microenvironment in Risk of Recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Prognostic Value of HER2.

Authors:  Julia Solek; Jedrzej Chrzanowski; Adrianna Cieslak; Aleksandra Zielinska; Dominika Piasecka; Marcin Braun; Rafal Sadej; Hanna M Romanska
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  Assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index with deep learning in DCIS (ductal carcinoma in situ).

Authors:  Lukasz Fulawka; Jakub Blaszczyk; Martin Tabakov; Agnieszka Halon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A Novel Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis and Tailoring Local Therapy Decision for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ after Breast Conserving Surgery.

Authors:  Feifei Xu; Lu Cao; Cheng Xu; Gang Cai; Rong Cai; Weixiang Qi; Shubei Wang; Kunwei Shen; Weimin Chai; Jiayi Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  PBK Enhances Cellular Proliferation With Histone H3 Phosphorylation and Suppresses Migration and Invasion With CDH1 Stabilization in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Akira Koshino; Aya Nagano; Akinobu Ota; Toshinori Hyodo; Akane Ueki; Masayuki Komura; Akane Sugimura-Nagata; Masahide Ebi; Naotaka Ogasawara; Kenji Kasai; Yoshitaka Hosokawa; Kunio Kasugai; Satoru Takahashi; Shingo Inaguma
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.