W Gordon Frankle1, Jennifer Paris2, Michael Himes2, N Scott Mason3, Chester A Mathis3, Rajesh Narendran4. 1. Department of Psychiatry, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: william.frankle@nyumc.org. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Receptor imaging studies have reported increased amphetamine-induced dopamine release in subjects with schizophrenia (SCH) relative to healthy control subjects (HCs). A limitation of these studies, performed with D2/3 antagonist radiotracers, is the failure to provide information about D2/3 receptors configured in a state of high affinity for the agonists (i.e., D2/3 receptors coupled to G proteins [D2/3 HIGH]). The endogenous agonist dopamine binds with preference to D2/3 HIGH receptors relative to D2/3 LOW receptors, making it critical to understand the status of D2/3 HIGH receptors in SCH. METHODS: D2/3 agonist positron emission tomography radiotracer [11C]N-propyl-norapomorphine ([11C]NPA) binding potential (BPND) was measured in 14 off-medication subjects with SCH and 14 matched HCs at baseline and after the administration of 0.5 mg kg-1 oral D-amphetamine. The amphetamine-induced change in BPND (ΔBPND) was calculated as the difference between BPND in the postamphetamine condition and BPND in the baseline condition and was expressed as a percentage of BPND at baseline. RESULTS: A trend-level increase was observed in comparing baseline [11C]NPA BPND (repeated-measures analysis of variance, F1,26 = 3.34, p = .08) between the SCH and HC groups. Amphetamine administration significantly decreased BPND in all striatal regions across all subjects in both groups. No differences were observed in [11C]NPA ΔBPND (repeated-measures analysis of variance, F1,26 = 1.9, p = .18) between HCs and subjects with SCH. Amphetamine significantly increased positive symptoms in subjects with SCH (19.5 ± 5.3 vs. 23.7 ± 4.1, paired t test, p < .0001); however, no correlations were noted with [11C]NPA BPND or ΔBPND. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides in vivo indication of a role for postsynaptic factors in amphetamine-induced psychosis in SCH.
BACKGROUND: Receptor imaging studies have reported increased amphetamine-induced dopamine release in subjects with schizophrenia (SCH) relative to healthy control subjects (HCs). A limitation of these studies, performed with D2/3 antagonist radiotracers, is the failure to provide information about D2/3 receptors configured in a state of high affinity for the agonists (i.e., D2/3 receptors coupled to G proteins [D2/3 HIGH]). The endogenous agonist dopamine binds with preference to D2/3 HIGH receptors relative to D2/3 LOW receptors, making it critical to understand the status of D2/3 HIGH receptors in SCH. METHODS: D2/3 agonist positron emission tomography radiotracer [11C]N-propyl-norapomorphine ([11C]NPA) binding potential (BPND) was measured in 14 off-medication subjects with SCH and 14 matched HCs at baseline and after the administration of 0.5 mg kg-1 oral D-amphetamine. The amphetamine-induced change in BPND (ΔBPND) was calculated as the difference between BPND in the postamphetamine condition and BPND in the baseline condition and was expressed as a percentage of BPND at baseline. RESULTS: A trend-level increase was observed in comparing baseline [11C]NPA BPND (repeated-measures analysis of variance, F1,26 = 3.34, p = .08) between the SCH and HC groups. Amphetamine administration significantly decreased BPND in all striatal regions across all subjects in both groups. No differences were observed in [11C]NPA ΔBPND (repeated-measures analysis of variance, F1,26 = 1.9, p = .18) between HCs and subjects with SCH. Amphetamine significantly increased positive symptoms in subjects with SCH (19.5 ± 5.3 vs. 23.7 ± 4.1, paired t test, p < .0001); however, no correlations were noted with [11C]NPA BPND or ΔBPND. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides in vivo indication of a role for postsynaptic factors in amphetamine-induced psychosis in SCH.
Authors: Raul R Gainetdinov; Laura M Bohn; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Michel Cyr; Aki Laakso; Alexander D Macrae; Gonzalo E Torres; Kyeong Man Kim; Robert J Lefkowitz; Marc G Caron; Richard T Premont Journal: Neuron Date: 2003-04-24 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Romina Mizrahi; Jean Addington; Pablo M Rusjan; Ivonne Suridjan; Alvina Ng; Isabelle Boileau; Jens C Pruessner; Gary Remington; Sylvain Houle; Alan A Wilson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Nina B L Urban; Mark Slifstein; Judy L Thompson; Xiaoyan Xu; Ragy R Girgis; Sonia Raheja; Margaret Haney; Anissa Abi-Dargham Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-01-29 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: O Mawlawi; D Martinez; M Slifstein; A Broft; R Chatterjee; D R Hwang; Y Huang; N Simpson; K Ngo; R Van Heertum; M Laruelle Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Lawrence S Kegeles; Anissa Abi-Dargham; W Gordon Frankle; Roberto Gil; Thomas B Cooper; Mark Slifstein; Dah-Ren Hwang; Yiyun Huang; Suzanne N Haber; Marc Laruelle Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2010-03
Authors: A Breier; T P Su; R Saunders; R E Carson; B S Kolachana; A de Bartolomeis; D R Weinberger; N Weisenfeld; A K Malhotra; W C Eckelman; D Pickar Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1997-03-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: E van de Giessen; J J Weinstein; C M Cassidy; M Haney; Z Dong; R Ghazzaoui; N Ojeil; L S Kegeles; X Xu; N P Vadhan; N D Volkow; M Slifstein; A Abi-Dargham Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2016-03-22 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Joshua Gertler; Savannah Tollefson; Rehima Jordan; Michael L Himes; N Scott Mason; W Gordon Frankle; Rajesh Narendran Journal: Synapse Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Ana Weidenauer; Martin Bauer; Ulrich Sauerzopf; Lucie Bartova; Lukas Nics; Sarah Pfaff; Cecile Philippe; Neydher Berroterán-Infante; Verena Pichler; Bernhard M Meyer; Ulrich Rabl; Patrick Sezen; Paul Cumming; Thomas Stimpfl; Harald H Sitte; Rupert Lanzenberger; Nilufar Mossaheb; Alexander Zimprich; Pablo Rusjan; Georg Dorffner; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Lukas Pezawas; Siegfried Kasper; Wolfgang Wadsak; Nicole Praschak-Rieder; Matthäus Willeit Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Vladimir Shalgunov; Aren van Waarde; Jan Booij; Martin C Michel; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Philip H Elsinga Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2018-11-18 Impact factor: 12.944
Authors: Tarik Dahoun; Matthew M Nour; Robert A McCutcheon; Rick A Adams; Michael A P Bloomfield; Oliver D Howes Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 6.222