Literature DB >> 29325840

Early comparative outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in severely obese patients.

Zachary C Lum1, David A Crawford2, Adolph V Lombardi3, Jason M Hurst4, Michael J Morris4, Joanne B Adams5, Keith R Berend3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) may have advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of obesity. There has been no direct comparison between the two cohorts. This study compares outcomes and complications of severely obese patients undergoing medial UKA versus TKA.
METHODS: Six hundred and fifty medial UKA and 1300 TKA were performed in patients with BMI >35kg/m2 (mean 41kg/m2) between 2007 and 2012. Pre- and postoperative ROM, Knee Society scores, perioperative factors, complications and reoperations were compared.
RESULTS: UKA patients had higher preoperative ROM, and Knee Society pain (KSP), functional (KSF), and clinical (KSC) scores (p<0.001, p=0.0008, p=0.0003, p=0.051 respectively). Mean tourniquet times, operative times, and lengths of stay were lower after UKA. Four TKA patients required transfusion. Mean follow-up was 2.3years. The frequency of manipulation under anesthesia was higher in TKA patients (p<0.001), while the rate of component revision was similar between the two groups (1.2% vs. 1.7%, p=0.328). Frequency of deep infection was lower in the UKA group (p=0.016). Postoperative KSF, change in KSF, and ROM were higher (p<0.0001) after UKA, but KSP and KSC were equivalent.
CONCLUSIONS: Severely obese patients who underwent medial UKA demonstrated equal survivorship with substantially fewer reoperations, reduced deep infection, and less perioperative complications at short term follow-up. Severely obese patients had improved KSF scores and maintenance of ROM after UKA compared with TKA.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Obesity; Outcomes; Total knee arthroplasty; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29325840     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2017.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  17 in total

1.  What future in the treatment of osteochondral knee defects?

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Vincenza Ragone; Nicola Ursino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-12

2.  Component positioning of the first 300 mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  Landon H Morikawa; Dylan B Combs; Samantha N Andrews; Kristin Mathews; Cass K Nakasone
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-10

3.  Inferior outcome of revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty compared with primary total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jin Kyu Lee; Hyun Jung Kim; Jae Ok Park; Jae-Hyuk Yang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Dong Wu; Minzhi Yang; Zheng Cao; Xiangpeng Kong; Yi Wang; Renwen Guo; Wei Chai
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-15

5.  Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mei Lin Tay; Sue R McGlashan; A Paul Monk; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: five-year clinical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Matthew Banger; James Doonan; Philip Rowe; Bryn Jones; Angus MacLean; Mark J B Blyth
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  The Influence of Obesity on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Jia Hui Ng; Wei Jie Loke; Wee Liang Hao James
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

8.  Prevalence and burden of orthopaedic implantable-device infections in Italy: a hospital-based national study.

Authors:  Luca Pirisi; Federico Pennestrì; Marco Viganò; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Revision Rates in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Kevin F Purcell; Benjamin M Stronach; Marie Gene Almand; Doug Parsell; Trevor Pickering; R Kerk Mehrle; Craig Winkler; Jeff D Almand
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-06-23

10.  Comparison of Functional Outcome of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Computer-Assisted Patient-Specific Templating.

Authors:  Atef Mohamed Morsy; Emad Gaber Elbana; Ahmed Gaber Mostafa; Mark Ashraf Edward; Mahmoud A Hafez
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.