Literature DB >> 29325664

Results of the Clinician Apps Survey, How Clinicians Working With Patients With Diabetes and Obesity Use Mobile Health Apps.

Justine Karduck1, Karen Chapman-Novakofski2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and administer a questionnaire to determine what factors may be associated with app use (including frequency of use, reasons to recommend to clients/patients, perceived effectiveness on health, health aspects used, features, and types of apps) by clinicians working in diabetes and weight management patient care settings.
METHODS: The Clinician Apps Survey was developed and contained 3 question domains (smartphone apps use, behavior theory in counseling sessions, and demographics) to explore frequency, types, preferred features, benefits/barriers of using apps, counseling techniques used, and clinician demographics. Clinicians (n = 719) were recruited to complete the online survey through 4 dietetics and diabetes professional groups. Clinician use and preferences for health-related apps for personal reasons and in patient care settings were determined, and comparisons were made between high and non-app users. Descriptive statistics were used with current practices and attitudes about apps. Chi-square test of independence compared those using apps both personally and professionally (app enthusiasts) vs those with no app use.
RESULTS: There were more app enthusiasts (53%; n = 380) than non-app users (20%; n = 145). Whereas 68% recommended pen/paper methods for diet and physical activity monitoring, 62% recommended apps. Most agreed that apps were superior to traditional methods for patients to track dietary intake (62%) and physical activity (58%), make better food choices (34%), lose weight (45%), and track blood glucose (43%). App enthusiasts used the American Association of Diabetes Educators self-care guidelines (P = .001) and advanced counseling techniques (eg, motivational interviewing) more often than did non-app users (P < .004). Apps most frequently recommended to clients were MyFitnessPal (n = 425), CalorieKing (n = 356), and Fitbit (n = 312). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Health-related smartphone apps are being widely used and recommended to patients with diabetes and obesity by clinicians for self-monitoring of dietary and physical activity behaviors. Furthermore, many clinicians believe that these types of tracking apps may improve patient outcomes compared with traditional methods of monitoring dietary and physical activity behaviors.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diabetes; mobile applications; nutritionist; smartphone; surveys and questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29325664     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav        ISSN: 1499-4046            Impact factor:   3.045


  14 in total

1.  The Use of General Health Apps Among Users with Specific Conditions: Why College Women with Disordered Eating Adopt Food Diary Apps.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Eikey; Kayla M Booth; Yunan Chen; Kai Zheng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-12-05

Review 2.  Patient Use of Cardiovascular Devices and Apps: Are We Getting Our Money's Worth?

Authors:  Kimberly Aguillard; Arthur Garson
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

3.  Barriers to and Facilitators of the Prescription of mHealth Apps in Australian General Practice: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Oyungerel Byambasuren; Elaine Beller; Tammy Hoffmann; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  What Healthcare Professionals Think of "Nutrition & Diet" Apps: An International Survey.

Authors:  Maria F Vasiloglou; Stergios Christodoulidis; Emilie Reber; Thomai Stathopoulou; Ya Lu; Zeno Stanga; Stavroula Mougiakakou
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Mobile Health Among Health Care Professionals From the United Kingdom: Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Simon Leigh; Liz Ashall-Payne; Tim Andrews
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Use, Perspectives, and Attitudes Regarding Diabetes Management Mobile Apps Among Diabetes Patients and Diabetologists in China: National Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Yiyu Zhang; Xia Li; Shuoming Luo; Chaoyuan Liu; Yuting Xie; Jia Guo; Fang Liu; Zhiguang Zhou
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  Perspectives of People Who Are Overweight and Obese on Using Wearable Technology for Weight Management: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ruiqi Hu; Michelle Helena van Velthoven; Edward Meinert
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 8.  Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Review of the Latest Evidence to Inform Practice.

Authors:  Drishti P Ghelani; Lisa J Moran; Cameron Johnson; Aya Mousa; Negar Naderpoor
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  A Novel Approach to Evaluating Mobile Smartphone Screen Time for iPhones: Feasibility and Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Aubrey D Gower; Megan A Moreno
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  eHealth Practices in Cancer Survivors With BMI in Overweight or Obese Categories: Latent Class Analysis Study.

Authors:  Annie Wen Lin; Sharon H Baik; David Aaby; Leslie Tello; Twila Linville; Nabil Alshurafa; Bonnie Spring
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2020-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.