Literature DB >> 29325189

Comparison of Three Methods to Quantify Laxity in the Canine Hip Joint.

Bart J G Broeckx1, Aldo Vezzoni2, Evelien Bogaerts3, Mileva Bertal3, Tim Bosmans4, Emmelie Stock3, Dieter Deforce5, Luc Peelman1, Jimmy H Saunders3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of PennHIP and a novel method to diagnose hip laxity, called the Vezzoni modified Badertscher distension device technique.
METHODS: In a total of 10 dogs, it was first assessed whether the distraction index (DI) from the PennHIP evaluation center could be reproduced by two individual observers. In the next two steps, the DI measurements made by the individual observers and the PennHIP evaluation center were compared with the laxity index (LI) measured on the Vezzoni modified Badertscher distension device view. Finally, the interobserver agreement of the DI, LI and Norberg angle was assessed and compared with classification criteria.
RESULTS: The results were similar for the first three comparisons: there was no evidence for bias, the relation between DI and LI was linear and the variability was small. A comparison of the interobserver agreement showed that the measurement variability for the NA was substantial, while the reproducibility for the DI and LI was equal. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While the standard ventrodorsal hip extended radiograph is most commonly used for diagnosis and screening of canine hip dysplasia, it lacks sensitivity to diagnose laxity. To improve the identification of hip joint laxity, distraction-based radiographic techniques are helpful. The Vezzoni modified Badertscher distension device technique allows for a reliable in-house evaluation of canine hip joint laxity. Schattauer GmbH Stuttgart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29325189     DOI: 10.3415/VCOT17-05-0064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0932-0814            Impact factor:   1.358


  5 in total

1.  Canine hip dysplasia screening: Comparison of early evaluation to final grading in 231 dogs with Fédération Cynologique Internationale A and B.

Authors:  Roxana Merca; Barbara Bockstahler; Aldo Vezzoni; Alexander Tichy; Simona Boano; Britta Vidoni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Rejections in an non-purpose bred assistance dog population: Reasons, consequences and methods for screening.

Authors:  Evelien Bogaerts; Christel P H Moons; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Luc Peelman; Jimmy H Saunders; Bart J G Broeckx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prevalence of Canine Hip Dysplasia in Switzerland Between 1995 and 2016-A Retrospective Study in 5 Common Large Breeds.

Authors:  Stefanie Ohlerth; Britta Geiser; Mark Flückiger; Urs Geissbühler
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Early hip laxity screening and later canine hip dysplasia development.

Authors:  Ana Santana; Sofia Alves-Pimenta; Pedro Franco-Gonçalo; Lio Gonçalves; João Martins; Bruno Colaço; Mário Ginja
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-03-24

5.  Genetic dissection of canine hip dysplasia phenotypes and osteoarthritis reveals three novel loci.

Authors:  Lea Mikkola; Saila Holopainen; Tiina Pessa-Morikawa; Anu K Lappalainen; Marjo K Hytönen; Hannes Lohi; Antti Iivanainen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.