Matteo Benelli1,2, Dario Romagnoli1,2, Francesca Demichelis1,3. 1. Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy. 2. Bioinformatics Unit, Hospital of Prato, Istituto Toscano Tumori, Prato, Italy. 3. Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
Motivation: Controlling for tumor purity in molecular analyses is essential to allow for reliable genomic aberration calls, for inter-sample comparison and to monitor heterogeneity of cancer cell populations. In genome wide screening studies, the assessment of tumor purity is typically performed by means of computational methods that exploit somatic copy number aberrations. Results: We present a strategy, called Purity Assessment from clonal MEthylation Sites (PAMES), which uses the methylation level of a few dozen, highly clonal, tumor type specific CpG sites to estimate the purity of tumor samples, without the need of a matched benign control. We trained and validated our method in more than 6000 samples from different datasets. Purity estimates by PAMES were highly concordant with other state-of-the-art tools and its evaluation in a cancer cell line dataset highlights its reliability to accurately estimate tumor admixtures. We extended the capability of PAMES to the analysis of CpG islands instead of the more platform-specific CpG sites and demonstrated its accuracy in a set of advanced tumors profiled by high throughput DNA methylation sequencing. These analyses show that PAMES is a valuable tool to assess the purity of tumor samples in the settings of clinical research and diagnostics. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/cgplab/PAMES. Contact: matteo.benelli@uslcentro.toscana.it or f.demichelis@unitn.it. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Motivation: Controlling for tumor purity in molecular analyses is essential to allow for reliable genomic aberration calls, for inter-sample comparison and to monitor heterogeneity of cancer cell populations. In genome wide screening studies, the assessment of tumor purity is typically performed by means of computational methods that exploit somatic copy number aberrations. Results: We present a strategy, called Purity Assessment from clonal MEthylation Sites (PAMES), which uses the methylation level of a few dozen, highly clonal, tumor type specific CpG sites to estimate the purity of tumor samples, without the need of a matched benign control. We trained and validated our method in more than 6000 samples from different datasets. Purity estimates by PAMES were highly concordant with other state-of-the-art tools and its evaluation in a cancer cell line dataset highlights its reliability to accurately estimate tumor admixtures. We extended the capability of PAMES to the analysis of CpG islands instead of the more platform-specific CpG sites and demonstrated its accuracy in a set of advanced tumors profiled by high throughput DNA methylation sequencing. These analyses show that PAMES is a valuable tool to assess the purity of tumor samples in the settings of clinical research and diagnostics. Availability and implementation: https://github.com/cgplab/PAMES. Contact: matteo.benelli@uslcentro.toscana.it or f.demichelis@unitn.it. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: W H Lee; R A Morton; J I Epstein; J D Brooks; P A Campbell; G S Bova; W S Hsieh; W B Isaacs; W G Nelson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1994-11-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Kasper Daniel Hansen; Winston Timp; Héctor Corrada Bravo; Sarven Sabunciyan; Benjamin Langmead; Oliver G McDonald; Bo Wen; Hao Wu; Yun Liu; Dinh Diep; Eirikur Briem; Kun Zhang; Rafael A Irizarry; Andrew P Feinberg Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2011-06-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Kosuke Yoshihara; Maria Shahmoradgoli; Emmanuel Martínez; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Hoon Kim; Wandaliz Torres-Garcia; Victor Treviño; Hui Shen; Peter W Laird; Douglas A Levine; Scott L Carter; Gad Getz; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Gordon B Mills; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Anshul Kundaje; Wouter Meuleman; Jason Ernst; Misha Bilenky; Angela Yen; Alireza Heravi-Moussavi; Pouya Kheradpour; Zhizhuo Zhang; Jianrong Wang; Michael J Ziller; Viren Amin; John W Whitaker; Matthew D Schultz; Lucas D Ward; Abhishek Sarkar; Gerald Quon; Richard S Sandstrom; Matthew L Eaton; Yi-Chieh Wu; Andreas R Pfenning; Xinchen Wang; Melina Claussnitzer; Yaping Liu; Cristian Coarfa; R Alan Harris; Noam Shoresh; Charles B Epstein; Elizabeta Gjoneska; Danny Leung; Wei Xie; R David Hawkins; Ryan Lister; Chibo Hong; Philippe Gascard; Andrew J Mungall; Richard Moore; Eric Chuah; Angela Tam; Theresa K Canfield; R Scott Hansen; Rajinder Kaul; Peter J Sabo; Mukul S Bansal; Annaick Carles; Jesse R Dixon; Kai-How Farh; Soheil Feizi; Rosa Karlic; Ah-Ram Kim; Ashwinikumar Kulkarni; Daofeng Li; Rebecca Lowdon; GiNell Elliott; Tim R Mercer; Shane J Neph; Vitor Onuchic; Paz Polak; Nisha Rajagopal; Pradipta Ray; Richard C Sallari; Kyle T Siebenthall; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Michael Stevens; Robert E Thurman; Jie Wu; Bo Zhang; Xin Zhou; Arthur E Beaudet; Laurie A Boyer; Philip L De Jager; Peggy J Farnham; Susan J Fisher; David Haussler; Steven J M Jones; Wei Li; Marco A Marra; Michael T McManus; Shamil Sunyaev; James A Thomson; Thea D Tlsty; Li-Huei Tsai; Wei Wang; Robert A Waterland; Michael Q Zhang; Lisa H Chadwick; Bradley E Bernstein; Joseph F Costello; Joseph R Ecker; Martin Hirst; Alexander Meissner; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Ting Wang; Manolis Kellis Journal: Nature Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Abrar Choudhury; Stephanie Hilz; Stephen T Magill; David R Raleigh; Harish N Vasudevan; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; William C Chen; Calixto-Hope G Lucas; Steve E Braunstein; Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush; Nicholas Butowski; Melike Pekmezci; Michael W McDermott; Arie Perry; David A Solomon Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2022-06-27 Impact factor: 15.887
Authors: Stephen T Magill; Charlotte D Eaton; Abrar Choudhury; Briana C Prager; William C Chen; Martha A Cady; Kyounghee Seo; Calixto-Hope G Lucas; Tim J Casey-Clyde; Harish N Vasudevan; S John Liu; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Tai-Chung Lam; Jenny Kan-Suen Pu; Lai-Fung Li; Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung; Danielle L Swaney; Michael Y Zhang; Jason W Chan; Zhixin Qiu; Michael V Martin; Matthew S Susko; Steve E Braunstein; Nancy Ann Oberheim Bush; Jessica D Schulte; Nicholas Butowski; Penny K Sneed; Mitchel S Berger; Nevan J Krogan; Arie Perry; Joanna J Phillips; David A Solomon; Joseph F Costello; Michael W McDermott; Jeremy N Rich; David R Raleigh Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 41.307
Authors: Himisha Beltran; Alessandro Romanel; Vincenza Conteduca; Nicola Casiraghi; Michael Sigouros; Gian Marco Franceschini; Francesco Orlando; Tarcisio Fedrizzi; Sheng-Yu Ku; Emma Dann; Alicia Alonso; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Andrea Sboner; Jenny Xiang; Olivier Elemento; David M Nanus; Scott T Tagawa; Matteo Benelli; Francesca Demichelis Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Niels Verburg; Floris P Barthel; Kevin J Anderson; Kevin C Johnson; Thomas Koopman; Maqsood M Yaqub; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Frederik Barkhof; Petra J W Pouwels; Jaap C Reijneveld; Annemieke J M Rozemuller; Jeroen A M Beliën; Ronald Boellaard; Michael D Taylor; Sunit Das; Joseph F Costello; William Peter Vandertop; Pieter Wesseling; Philip C de Witt Hamer; Roel G W Verhaak Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 12.300