| Literature DB >> 29324844 |
David J Barakat1, Rahul Suresh1, Theresa Barberi1, Kenneth J Pienta1,2, Brian W Simons2, Alan D Friedman1.
Abstract
The microenvironment of prostate cancer often includes abundant tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), with their acquisition of an M2 phenotype correlating with local aggressiveness and metastasis. Tumor-derived M-CSF contributes to TAM M2 polarization, and M-CSF receptor inhibition slows prostate cancer growth in model systems. As additional cytokines can direct TAM M2 polarization, targeting downstream transcription factors could avoid resistance. Klf4 and C/EBPβ each contribute to monocyte development, and reduced expression of macrophage Klf4 or C/EBPβ favors their adoption of a pro-inflammatory M1 state. We find that a Hi-Myc C57BL/6 prostate cancer line grows more slowly in syngeneic Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre compared with Klf4(f/f) mice when inoculated subcutaneously, but grows equally rapidly in C/EBPβ(f/f);Lys-Cre and C/EBPβ(f/f) hosts. In the absence of myeloid Klf4, TAMs have reduced expression of surface mannose receptor and Fizz1 mRNA, both M2 markers. Global gene expression analysis further revealed activation of pro-inflammatory, pro-atherosclerotic pathways. Analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) demonstrated markedly increased activated CD8 T cell numbers, and CD8 T cell depletion obviated the inhibitory effect of myeloid Klf4 deletion on prostate cancer growth. These findings suggest that reducing expression or activity of the Klf4 transcription factor in tumor myeloid cells may contribute to prostate cancer therapy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324844 PMCID: PMC5764416 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Hi-Myc prostate cancer grows more slowly in the absence of myeloid Klf4.
A) Estimated tumor volumes evaluated every 2–3 days after inoculation of B6 Hi-Myc tumor cells SQ into the flanks of Klf4(f/f) or Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre mice. B) Estimated day 29 tumor volumes (~Vo) (mean and SE). C) Best fit lines of estimated tumor volumes versus time, V = Vo + ebt for these same data. D) Mean exponential gowth rates, “b”, of Hi-Myc tumors (mean and SE).
Fig 2Hi-Myc prostate cancer increases TAMs with reduced mannose receptor in the absence of myeloid Klf4.
A) Gating strategy for identifying CD45+CD11b+ tumor myeloid cells, and TAMs, monocytes, and granulocytes within the tumor myeloid population. B) Quantification of myeloid cells (left) and myeloid subsets (right) as a percentage of viable tumor cells in Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre PCa recipients 21 days after inoculation of Hi-Myc PCa (mean and SE, n = 3). C) Representative FC plots (left) for MR, MHCII;CD86 and CD11c expression, bar graphs (right) showing the percentage of MRhi, MHCII+CD86+, and CD11c+ TAMs (top), and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in these populations (bottom) on day 21 in Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre PCa recipients (mean and SE, n = 3). * p <0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p <0.001.
Fig 3Absence of myeloid C/EBPβ does not affect growth of Hi-Myc prostate cancer.
A) Estimated tumor volumes evaluated every 2–3 days after inoculation of B6 Hi-Myc PCa cells SQ into the flanks of C/EBPβ(f/f) or C/EBPβ(f/f);Lys-Cre mice. B) Percentage of myeloid cells, TAMs, monocytes, and granulocytes amongst viable tumor cells on day 21 (mean and SE, n = 3).
Fig 4Expression of a subset of M1 and M2 mRNAs in Hi-Myc prostate cancer myeloid cells in Klf4(f/f) versus Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre hosts.
RNAs prepared from tumor CD11b+ cells on day 21 after Hi-Myc PCa inoculation were subjected to quantitative RT-PCR analysis for the indicated M1 and M2 markers and for the RNA encoding cyclophilin A as an internal control. The relative expression of each mRNA is shown for Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre recipients, with expression in Klf4(f/f) mice set to 1.0 (mean and SE, n = 5).
Ingenuity pathway analysis of Klf4(f/f) vs Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre PCa myeloid cells*.
| Pathway (-logB-H p-value) | RNAs higher in Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre | RNAs higher in Klf4(f/f) |
|---|---|---|
| Atherosclerosis Signaling (5.01) | Mmp3, CD36, Clu, Cma1, Col1a1, Col1a2, Col3a1, IL1rn, Rbp4, S100a8 | Lyz, Pdgfb, Tnf |
| LXR/RXR Activation (4.56) | Ahsg, CD36, Clu, IL1r2, IL1rn, Lbp, Rbp4, Vtn, S100a8 | Lyz, Nos2,Tnf |
| Granulocyte Adhesion and Diapedesis (3.98) | Ccl7, Cldn3, Cldn10, Fpr1, Hspb1 IL1r2, IL1rn, Mmp3, Pf4, Sell | Ccl24,Cxcl9,Tnf |
| Agranulocyte Adhesion and Diapedesis (3.79) | Acta2, Ccl7, Cldn3, Cldn10, IL1rn, Mmp3, Myl9, Pf4, Sell | Ccl24, Cxcl9, Fn1, Tnf |
| Hepatic Fibrosis/Hepatic Stellate Cell Activation (3.52) | Acta2, Ccr7, Col1a1, Col1a2, Col3a1, Igfbp5, IL1r2, Lbp, Myl9 | Fn1, Pdgfb, Tnf |
| Acute Phase Response Signaling (2.67) | Ahsg, C1r, Hp, IL1rn, Lbp, Rbp1, Rbp4, Saa3, Serping1 | Fn1, Tnf |
| Altered T Cell and B Cell Signaling in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (2.67) | Spp1, IL1rn | HLA-DMA, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DRB5, Tlr12, Tnf, Tnfsf13b |
| Role of Macrophages, Fibroblasts and Endothelial Cells in RA (2.49) | Dkk3, IL1r2, IL1rn, Mmp3, Sfrp2, Traf4 | Camk2d, Cebpe, Fn1, Nos2, Pdgfb, Prkcb, Tlr12, Tnf, Tnfsf13b |
| T Helper Cell Differentiation (2.49) | Icosl, IL2ra, HLA-DMA, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DRB5, Tgfbr1, Tnf | |
| Communication Between Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells (2.46) | Ccr7, IL1rn | HLA-DRB5, Ifnb1 Tlr12, Tnf, Tnfsf13b |
*Top 10 Ingenuity Pathways comparing mean RNA levels from CD11b+ myeloid cells isolated from Hi-Myc PCa tumors in Klf4(f/f) vs Klf4(f/f)Lys-Cre hosts (n = 2 per group).
Extracellular atherosclerosis plaque proteins in myeloid cells lacking Klf4*.
| RNAs higher in Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre | RNAs higher in Klf4(f/f) |
|---|---|
| Aebp1, Clu, Col1a1, Col3a1, Cpa3, Dcn, Htra1, Lama5, Lamb2, Lum, Mfge8, Pcolce, S100a8, S100a9, Saa3, Serping1, Spp1, Tnxb, Vtn | Fn1 |
*RNAs increased or reduced >1.4-fold that correspond to extracellular proteins in carotid plaques but not in normal carotid arteries.
Fig 5Increased number of activated CD8 T cells in Hi-Myc prostate cancer in hosts lacking myeloid Klf4.
A) Representative FC plots for CD45;CD3 expression and for CD4 and CD8 expression amongst CD45+CD3+ tumor cells (left) and the percentage of CD3, CD4, or CD8 T cells amongst viable tumor cells on day 21 in Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre Hi-Myc PCa recipients (right, mean and SE, n = 3). B) Percentage of CD45+CD3+CD8+IFNγ+ or CD45+CD3+CD8+CD69+ cells amongst live tumor cells on d21. C) Percentage CD3+CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells on day 21 in Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre PCa recipients (right, mean and SE, n = 3).
Fig 6CD8 T cell depletion eliminates slower growth of Hi-Myc prostate cancer in mice lacking myeloid Klf4.
A) Klf4(f/f) and Klf4(f/f);Lys-Cre mice received CD8 antibody (Ab) on days -7, -5, -3, and 0 followed by Hi-Myc PCa cell inoculation on d0, as diagrammed. B) Representative CD4;CD8 FACS plots demonstrating efficient depletion of CD8 T cells from the peripheral blood one day prior to PCa inoculation C) Estimated tumor volumes evaluated every 2–3 days after inoculation. D) Estimated day 14 tumor volumes, Vo (mean and SE). E) Best fit lines for the estimated tumor volumes versus time, V = Vo + ebt for these same data. F) Mean exponential growth rates, “b”, of Hi-Myc tumors (mean and SE).