| Literature DB >> 29324772 |
Andrea Contina1, Eli S Bridge1, Jeremy D Ross1, J Ryan Shipley2, Jeffrey F Kelly1,3,4.
Abstract
Complex behavioral traits, such as those making up a migratory phenotype, are regulated by multiple environmental factors and multiple genes. We investigated possible relationships between microsatellite variation at two candidate genes implicated in the control of migratory behavior, Clock and Adcyap1, and several aspects of migratory life-history and evolutionary divergence in the Painted Bunting (Passerina ciris), a species that shows wide variation in migratory and molting strategies across a disjunct distribution. We focused on Clock and Adcyap1 microsatellite variation across three Painted Bunting populations in Oklahoma, Louisiana, and North Carolina, and for the Oklahoma breeding population we used published migration tracking data on adult males to explore phenotypic variation in individual migratory behavior. We found no correlation between microsatellite allele size within either Clock and Adcyap1 relative to the initiation or duration of fall migration in adult males breeding in Oklahoma. We also show the lack of significant correlations with aspects of the migratory phenotype for the Louisiana population. Our research highlights the limitations of studying microsatellite allelic mutations that are of undetermined functional influence relative to complex behavioral phenotypes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324772 PMCID: PMC5764313 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Painted Bunting distribution.
The breeding and wintering ground are indicated in yellow and green, respectively. Blue crosses indicate sampling locations in Oklahoma (OK), Louisiana (LA) and North Carolina (NC). Dotted-line arrows and question marks indicate hypothetical migratory routes.
Clock and Adcyap1 allelic variation across populations.
Gene diversity, allelic richness, minimum and maximum allele size, allele average, and most common allele (also reported as a percentage) are presented for each population.
| CLOCK | ADCYAP1 | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Gene | Allele | Allele size | Allele size | Allele | most | most | Gene | Allele | Allele size | Allele size | Allele | most | most |
| (sampling site) | diversity | richness | min. | max. | average | common | common | diversity | richness | min. | max. | average | common | common |
| % | % | |||||||||||||
| 0.62 | 6 | 277 | 285 | 278.8 | 277 | 58% | 0.75 | 7 | 165 | 177 | 168.9 | 169 | 39% | |
| 0.6 | 4.9 | 277 | 286 | 278.7 | 277 | 60% | 0.73 | 4.9 | 165 | 173 | 169.1 | 169 | 40% | |
| 0.51 | 2 | 277 | 280 | 278.5 | 280 | 75% | 0.64 | 3 | 167 | 171 | 169.3 | 169 | 90% | |
FST and RST values.
FST and RST values for population differentiation at Clock, Adcyap1, and neutral loci computed in ARLEQUIN.
| Clock | Adcyap1 | Neutral loci | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Population | Population | |||||||
| FST | 0.002 | -0.014 | 0.066* | ||||||
| 0.117* | 0.065* | 0.012* | -0.006 | 0.096* | 0.076* | ||||
| Population | Population | Population | |||||||
| RST | -0.025 | -0.022 | 0.032 | ||||||
| -0.009 | -0.018 | -0.01 | -0.02 | 0.078* | 0.002 | ||||
Statistically significant pairwise differences (p < 0.05) are marked with asterisks.
Fig 2STRUCTURE Q matrix output for Clock, Adcyap1, and neutral loci.
The graphs show the cluster assignment probabilities for Painted Buntings sampled in three populations (OK = Oklahoma; LA = Louisiana; NC = North Carolina) for K = 2. The probability (Q) of each population to be assigned to a cluster is shown on the vertical axes and in panel d. Each cluster is represented with a different color. The dashed yellow line represents the threshold probability (Q > 0.6) above which a population is considered part of a distinct cluster.
Correlation analysis between allelic and phenotypic variation.
Clock and Adcyap1 microsatellites did not correlate with any of the phenotypic variables investigated in Oklahoma and Louisiana buntings (p > 0.05). Allele-a indicates short alleles and allele-b indicates long alleles. Correlation values smaller than 0.01 are reported as nd (not detected).
| CLOCK | ADCYAP1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oklahoma | allele-a | allele-b | allele-a | allele-b |
| Departure dates (OK) | r = 0.24; p = 0.31 | nd | r = 0.04; p = 0.86 | r = 0.35; p = 0.13 |
| Duration of migration | r = 0.01; p = 0.94 | r = 0.11; p = 0.63 | r = 0.11; p = 0.64 | nd |
| Arrival dates (Sinaloa) | nd | r = 0.15; p = 0.52 | nd | r = 0.09; p = 0.70 |
| Arrival dates (Johnson B.) | r = 0.17; p = 0.44 | r = -0.02; p = 0.93 | r = 0.16; p = 0.48 | r = 0.11; p = 0.61 |
| Body mass (g) | r = 0.08; p = 0.18 | r = 0.09; p = 0.16 | nd | r = 0.05; p = 0.32 |
| Wing chord (mm) | r = 0.01; p = 0.59 | r = 0.01; p = 0.85 | r = 0.05; p = 0.32 | r = 0.02; p = 0.51 |
Differences in microsatellite allele size between populations at Clock and Adcyap1.
No significant microsatellite allele size differences were found between Oklahoma, Louisiana, and North Carolina populations (p > 0.05). Allele-a indicates short alleles and allele-b indicates long alleles.
| population | allele-a | allele-b | allele-a | allele-b |
| Oklahoma | Louisiana | |||
| Louisiana | t = 0.31; p = 0.72 | t = 0.03; p = 0.97 | ||
| North Carolina | t = -0.60; p = 0.54 | t = 1.43; p = 0.16 | t = -0.91; p = 0.36 | t = 1.22; p = 0.22 |
| population | allele-a | allele-b | allele-a | allele-b |
| Oklahoma | Louisiana | |||
| Louisiana | t = -1.83; p = 0.07 | t = 0.75; p = 0.45 | ||
| North Carolina | t = -1.81; p = 0.07 | t = 0.04; p = 0.96 | t = 0.33; p = 0.73 | t = -0.92; p = 0.36 |