| Literature DB >> 29324694 |
Tapabrata Maity1,2, Anushree Dutta3, Parijat Pallab Jana4, Konda Gokuldoss Prashanth5,6, Jürgen Eckert7,8, Jayanta Das9.
Abstract
The present study demonstrates the evolution of eutectic microstructure in arc-melted (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100-xNbx (0 ≤ x ≤ 10 atom %) composites containing α-Zr//FeZr₂ nano-lamellae phases along with pro-eutectic Zr-rich intermetallic phase. The effects of Nb addition on the microstructural evolution and mechanical properties under compression, bulk hardness, elastic modulus, and indentation fracture toughness (IFT) were investigated. The Zr-Fe-(Nb) eutectic composites (ECs) exhibited excellent fracture strength up to ~1800 MPa. Microstructural characterization revealed that the addition of Nb promotes the formation of intermetallic Zr54Fe37Nb₉. The IFT (KIC) increases from 3.0 ± 0.5 MPa√m (x = 0) to 4.7 ± 1.0 MPa√m (x = 2) at 49 N, which even further increases from 5.1 ± 0.5 MPa√m (x = 0) and up to 5.9 ± 1.0 MPa√m (x = 2) at higher loads. The results suggest that mutual interaction between nano-lamellar α-Zr//FeZr₂ phases is responsible for enhanced fracture resistance and high fracture strength.Entities:
Keywords: electron microscopy; eutectic alloys; indentation fracture toughness; mechanical properties; microstructure
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324694 PMCID: PMC5793611 DOI: 10.3390/ma11010113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1XRD patterns of (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx (0 ≤ x ≤ 10 atom %) showing the presence of both α-Zr and FeZr2 peaks in samples with x < 3 and the presence of α-Zr and Zr54Fe37Nb9 phases in samples with x > 3.
Figure 2Scanning electron microscopy images of (a) x = 0; (b) x = 2, and (c) x = 4 AMIs showing brighter FeZr2 and darker α-Zr nano-lamellar eutectic microstructure and (d) x = 6 and (e) x = 10 AMIs showing a heterogeneous type microstructure consisting of mainly α-Zr and Zr54Fe37Nb9 laves phases.
Phase constituents (including their volume fraction) and the corresponding mechanical properties of (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx composites.
| Alloys | Phases | α-Zr | FeZr2 | Zr54Fe37Nb9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x = 0 | α-Zr + FeZr2 | 69 | 31 | - | 1015 | 1025 | 2.1 |
| x = 2 | α-Zr + Zr54Fe37Nb9 + FeZr2 | 74 | 18 | 8 | 1055 | 1060 | 2.0 |
| x = 4 | α-Zr + Zr54Fe37Nb9 + FeZr2 | 72 | 12 | 16 | 1510 | 1510 | 2.4 |
| x = 6 | Zr54Fe37Nb9 + α-Zr | 72 | - | 28 | 1800 | 1800 | 3.7 |
| x = 10 | Zr54Fe37Nb9 + α-Zr | 61 | - | 39 | 1025 | 1025 | 1.8 |
Figure 3Transmission electron microscopy—bright field images of (a) x = 0 and (b) x = 2 samples showing the alternate nano-lamellar structures of the α-Zr and FeZr2 phases.
Figure 4The engineering stress–strain curves of (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx eutectic composites under compression at room temperature.
The density (ρ), Poisson’s ratio (ν), Young’s modulus (E), bulk modulus (K), and shear modulus (G) of (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx composites.
| Alloys | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x = 0 | 6.74 | 0.3787 | 68 | 25 | 94 |
| x = 2 | 6.82 | 0.3540 | 87 | 32 | 99 |
| x = 4 | 6.88 | 0.3396 | 97 | 36 | 101 |
| x = 6 | 6.90 | 0.3396 | 101 | 38 | 105 |
| x = 10 | 7.03 | 0.3499 | 96 | 36 | 107 |
Vickers bulk hardness (H), indentation fracture toughness (K), and Palmqvist crack length (l) at different applied P values.
| Alloys | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| x = 0 | 49 | 3.82 ± 0.17 | 33.09 ± 10 | 3.02 ± 0.5 |
| 98 | 3.56 ± 0.10 | 33.68 ± 5 | 4.08 ± 0.2 | |
| 196 | 3.54 ± 0.05 | 64.22 ± 16 | 4.27 ± 0.6 | |
| 294 | 3.42 ± 0.13 | 67.43 ± 17 | 5.05 ± 0.5 | |
| x = 2 | 49 | 4.44 ± 0.12 | 18.69 ± 9 | 4.67 ± 1.0 |
| 98 | 4.21 ± 0.04 | 21.70 ± 1 | 5.70 ± 0.1 | |
| 196 | 4.13 ± 0.04 | 59.48 ± 19 | 5.07 ± 1.0 | |
| 294 | 4.20 ± 0.02 | 65.26 ± 23 | 5.90 ± 1.0 | |
| x = 4 | 49 | 5.30 ± 0.07 | 34.08 ± 14 | 3.71 ± 1.0 |
| 98 | 5.00 ± 0.05 | 87.63 ± 22 | 3.15 ± 0.7 | |
| 196 | 4.72 ± 0.10 | 166.27 ± 30 | 3.12 ± 0.3 | |
| 294 | 4.70 ± 0.05 | 201.66 ± 50 | 3.50 ± 0.4 | |
| x = 6 | 49 | 5.20 ± 0.05 | 26.38 ± 9 | 4.18 ± 1.0 |
| 98 | 5.06 ± 0.05 | 52.55 ± 17 | 4.21 ± 1.0 | |
| 196 | 4.93 ± 0.06 | 82.73 ± 8 | 4.48 ± 0.2 | |
| 294 | 4.88 ± 0.06 | 122.4 ± 18 | 4.52 ± 0.4 | |
| x = 10 | 49 | 5.06 ± 0.05 | 34.47 ± 3 | 3.56 ± 0.8 |
| 98 | 4.87 ± 0.01 | 72.60 ± 3 | 3.33 ± 0.2 | |
| 196 | 4.67 ± 0.04 | 112.5 ± 4 | 3.78 ± 0.4 | |
| 294 | 4.70 ± 0.06 | 144.9 ± 4 | 4.08 ± 0.4 |
Figure 5Plots of measured H vs. Nb content as a function of loads P from 49 N up to 294 N in (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx composites.
Figure 6Plots of measured value of K vs. Nb content in (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx composites at different P values in the range of 49 N up to 294 N.
Figure 7Secondary scanning electron microscopy images of indented impression along with Palmqvist cracks emerged from the edge of the indentation diagonals and crack deflection on the surface in (Zr0.76Fe0.24)100−xNbx. Inset: Scanning electron microscopy images showing the impression of the indentation N, with Nb content varying from (a) x = 0, (b) x = 2, (c) x = 4, (d) x = 6 and (e) x = 10 respectively.