| Literature DB >> 29324686 |
Ruixiang Deng1,2,3, Meiling Li4, Badar Muneer5,6, Qi Zhu7, Zaiying Shi8,9, Lixin Song10, Tao Zhang11.
Abstract
Optically Transparent Microwave Metamaterial Absorber (OTMMA) is of significant use in both civil and military field. In this paper, equivalent circuit model is adopted as springboard to navigate the design of OTMMA. The physical model and absorption mechanisms of ideal lightweight ultrathin OTMMA are comprehensively researched. Both the theoretical value of equivalent resistance and the quantitative relation between the equivalent inductance and equivalent capacitance are derived for design. Frequency-dependent characteristics of theoretical equivalent resistance are also investigated. Based on these theoretical works, an effective and controllable design approach is proposed. To validate the approach, a wideband OTMMA is designed, fabricated, analyzed and tested. The results reveal that high absorption more than 90% can be achieved in the whole 6~18 GHz band. The fabricated OTMMA also has an optical transparency up to 78% at 600 nm and is much thinner and lighter than its counterparts.Entities:
Keywords: absorption mechanism; broadband absorption; controllable design approach; metamaterial; microwave absorber; optical transparency
Year: 2018 PMID: 29324686 PMCID: PMC5793605 DOI: 10.3390/ma11010107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1(a) The concept of OTMMA; (b) the equivalent circuit model of metamaterial absorbers.
Figure 2(a) the L–C relationship curves at 2 GHz, 5 GHz and 10 GHz: dielectric thickness d = 3 mm and relative permittivity ε = 2.5; (b) the absorption curves of three design examples with the design parameters presented in Table 1.
The design parameters of three examples in Figure 2b and their absorption performances. The R is calculated from Equation (6) by replacing ε, d and f with 2.5, 3 mm and 10 GHz, respectively. The L and C are extracted from the purple curve in Figure 2a.
| No. | Bandwidth of Absorption Better Than 90% (GHz) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182.95 | 0.025 | 7.13 | 2.2 | |
| 182.95 | 0.040 | 3.33 | 4.1 | |
| 182.95 | 0.065 | 0.90 | 5.9 |
Figure 3(a) The R-f curves with fixed relative permittivity ε = 2.5 but different thickness d; (b) the R-f curves with fixed thickness d = 3 mm but different relative permittivity ε.
Figure 4The absorption performances of example absorbers with (a) R calculated using Equation (6) and (b) optimized R.
The parameter details of design examples in Figure 4.
| No. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | 25.0 | 1 | 12 | 18 | 104.3 | 200 |
| (2) | 2.08 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 191.5 | 275 |
| (3) | 5.32 | 2.5 | 8 | 18 | 107.7 | 205 |
| (4) | 33.28 | 1 | 8 | 18 | 22.08 | 45 |
| (5) | 2.5 | 10 | 2 | 17 | 71.88 | 300 |
Figure 5The proposed controllable design approach to OTMMAs.
Figure 6(a) The L-C relationship curves at 5.72 GHz and 18 GHz when d = 3.6 mm and ε = 2.5; (b) the simulated absorption performances using ADS and HFSS under normally incident plane waves.
Figure 7The structure of the designed OTMMA.
Figure 8The (a–c) surface current density distributions; (d–f) -field distributions and (g–i) surface loss density distributions of the designed OTMMA’s unit cell at 4, 7 and 16 GHz, respectively, at normal incident plane waves.
Geometric parameters of each unit cell in the designed OTMMA in Figure 7.
| 5.3 | 6 | 3.6 | 0.17 | 0.7 |
Figure 9Simulated angular dependence of absorption performances of the OTMMA under different polarized incident waves: (a) TE and (b) TM waves.
Figure 10(a) front view and cross-section view (interpolation) of the fabricated large-scale OTMMA with 50 × 50 elements; (b) the RCS measurement system of OTMMA by arch test system; (c) the simulated and measured absorption performances of the OTMMA under normally incident plane wave; and (d) the tested transparency results of the OTMMA.
Comparison on absorption performance between OTMMA in this work and previous works.
| Absorber | Absorption Band above 90% (GHz) | Relative Bandwidth 1 | Thickness (mm) | Relative Thickness 2 | Optical Transparency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ref. [ | 8.3~11.6 | 1.40 | 24.56 | 0.679 | Not given |
| Ref. [ | 125~165 | 1.32 | 1.3 | 0.542 | 80~85% |
| Ref. [ | About 8.7~11.2 | 1.28 | 3.6 | 0.104 | 80~85% |
| Ref. [ | 0.915~0.928 | 1.01 | 5.1 | 0.015 | About 75% |
| Ref. [ | 9.6~13.9 | 1.45 | 2.1 | 0.068 | Metal mesh-96.3% |
| This work | 6~18 | 3 | 4.0 | 0.080 | 78% at 600 nm |
1 Relative bandwidth is defined as the ratio of the highest frequency and the lowest frequency in the band when absorption is better than 90%; 2 Relative thickness is defined as the ratio of the thickness and wavelength of the lowest absorption frequency when absorption is better than 90%.