Literature DB >> 29324449

Toward Optimizing Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Normalization Reduces the Need for Strong Neck Muscle Contraction.

Kimberley S Noij1, Barbara S Herrmann, Steven D Rauch, John J Guinan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) represents an inhibitory reflex of the saccule measured in the ipsilateral sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) in response to acoustic or vibrational stimulation. Since the cVEMP is a modulation of SCM electromyographic (EMG) activity, cVEMP amplitude is proportional to muscle EMG amplitude. We sought to evaluate muscle contraction influences on cVEMP peak-to-peak amplitudes (VEMPpp), normalized cVEMP amplitudes (VEMPn), and inhibition depth (VEMPid).
METHODS: cVEMPs at 500 Hz were measured in 25 healthy subjects for 3 SCM EMG contraction ranges: 45-65, 65-105, and 105-500 μV root mean square (r.m.s.). For each range, we measured cVEMP sound level functions (93-123 dB peSPL) and sound off, meaning that muscle contraction was measured without acoustic stimulation. The effect of muscle contraction amplitude on VEMPpp, VEMPn, and VEMPid and the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence were evaluated.
RESULTS: VEMPpp amplitudes were significantly greater at higher muscle contractions. In contrast, VEMPn and VEMPid showed no significant effect of muscle contraction. Cohen's d indicated that for all 3 cVEMP metrics contraction amplitude variations produced little change in the ability to distinguish cVEMP presence/absence. VEMPid more clearly indicated saccular output because when no acoustic stimulus was presented the saccular inhibition estimated by VEMPid was zero, unlike those by VEMPpp and VEMPn.
CONCLUSION: Muscle contraction amplitude strongly affects VEMPpp amplitude, but contractions 45-300 μV r.m.s. produce stable VEMPn and VEMPid values. Clinically, there may be no need for subjects to exert high contraction effort. This is especially beneficial in patients for whom maintaining high SCM contraction amplitudes is challenging.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential; Muscle contraction; Normalization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29324449      PMCID: PMC5849506          DOI: 10.1159/000485022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  19 in total

1.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: preliminary report.

Authors:  F W Akin; O D Murnane
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Age-related changes in the vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Kentaro Ochi; Toru Ohashi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Comparison of the head elevation versus rotation methods in eliciting vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Chi-Te Wang; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future.

Authors:  S M Rosengren; M S Welgampola; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Characterization of age-related changes in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Dietmar Basta; Ingo Todt; Arne Ernst
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Effects of muscle contraction on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Evaluating Inhibition of Motoneuron Firing From Electromyogram Data to Assess Vestibular Output Using Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Authors:  S R Prakash; Barbara S Herrmann; Rupprecht Milojcic; Steven D Rauch; John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Normalization reduces intersubject variability in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Mark J van Tilburg; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Steven D Rauch
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  The influence of voluntary EMG activity and click intensity on the vestibular click evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  C L Lim; P Clouston; G Sheean; C Yiannikas
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Menière's Disease: A Comparison of Response Metrics.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Steven D Rauch
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Toward Optimizing cVEMP: 2,000-Hz Tone Bursts Improve the Detection of Superior Canal Dehiscence.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Steven D Rauch
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 1.854

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.