Literature DB >> 29324371

Multiple synchronous adenocarcinomas of the small bowel in a young patient: A case report.

Cristián Cavalla1, Federico Oppliger2, Giancarlo Schiappacasse3, Rodrigo Valderrama4, Adriana Castiblanco5, Sonia Margarit6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel is a rare neoplasm presented usually in elder patients as a single tumor. Its presentation as multiple tumors and in young patients is exceptional and there aren't any guidelines to orient its therapy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present the rare case of a sixteen-year-old woman that presents to the emergency department with an intussusception due to a small bowel tumor. The resected specimen showed multiple adenocarcinomas. A complete endoscopic and PET-CT study showed other 5 lesions from the duodenum to the ileum that were resected. Genetic counseling showed no pathogenic changes. The final staging was T2N0M0 and only surveillance was indicated. The patient is now 3 years without any recurrence. DISCUSSION: Multiple adenocarcinomas of the small bowel are a very infrequent presentation of the disease. Most common risk factors include Crohn disease and adenomas. Its presentation is usually vague with a delay in its diagnosis. The treatment remains mainly surgical with limited use of adjuvant therapy. The most important prognostic factor is lymph node involvement with 5-year survival that can range from 3%-60% depending on the stage.
CONCLUSION: This case represents an exceptional presentation of a very rare pathology with few cases described in the literature. There isn't one single best study to stage the patient and surgery is still the standard of treatment while adjuvant therapies studies are being conducted. The young age and lack of predisposing factors or mutations leaves an open field for investigation.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Intussusception; Multiple adenocarcinomas; Small bowel; Surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29324371      PMCID: PMC5766744          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

This case report is in line with the SCARE guidelines for surgical case reports [1]. Small bowel malignancy is an uncommon condition comprising no more than 2% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Its annual incidence is approximately 13.9 cases per million persons. Clinical presentation is often vague and nonspecific delaying diagnosis [2]. The treatment of small bowel adenocarcinomas (SBA) is primarily surgical with limited role in adjuvant therapy. Most cases commonly present as single tumors in elder patients; however, we present a rare case of multiple adenocarcinomas of the small bowel in a young patient treated in our academic private institution.

Presentation of the case

A 16-year-old female without personal or family history of digestive diseases, cancer or genetic disorders presented to the emergency department. She complained of increasing diffuse abdominal pain over 12 h without nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or weight loss. She was afebrile, hemodinamically stable, with moderate diffuse abdominal tenderness and distention. A computerized tomography showed an intussusception of the small bowel without any other findings (Fig. 1a and b).
Fig. 1

Abdominal CT with i.v contrast (a) axial and (b) coronal view that shows small bowel thickening associated with an intussusception.

Abdominal CT with i.v contrast (a) axial and (b) coronal view that shows small bowel thickening associated with an intussusception. The patient underwent laparoscopic exploration. There was no free fluid, liver lesions or carcinomatosis. A jejunum-ileum intussusception was seen and a small laparotomy was performed. Multiple small polypoid tumors in the jejunum were the cause of the intussusception and 25 cm of small bowel were resected including all the lesions in the specimen without an extended lymphadenectomy and an end-to-end anastomosis was performed (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Resected segment of jejunum with different polypoid tumors that harbor adenocarcinoma.

Resected segment of jejunum with different polypoid tumors that harbor adenocarcinoma. Biopsy showed a mucinous adenocarcinoma, an epithelial tumor according the WHO classification of tumors of the small intestine, in 2 tumors of 4,3 cm and 3 cm and well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma in 10 tumors of 0,5 cm–1 cm. The tumors infiltrated up to the muscular layer without vascular or perineural penetration. All the tumors of the specimen resected had a wide free margin and one harvested lymph node was free of malignancy. Afterwards, the patient was controlled with an upper digestive endoscopy that showed a 2,5 cm tumor in the third portion of the duodenum. Colonoscopy was normal. Capsule enteroscopy showed the same tumor at the duodenum, but another 5 in the jejunum and 1 in the ileum. The patient underwent a PET-CT that showed 5 hypercatabolic lesions from the duodenum to the ileum without suspicious lymphadenopathies or metastases (Fig. 3a and b).
Fig. 3

a and b: PET-CT in axial and coronal views that shows two hypermetabolic foci in small bowel, one of them associated with an intussusception.

a and b: PET-CT in axial and coronal views that shows two hypermetabolic foci in small bowel, one of them associated with an intussusception. Pre-test genetic counseling was offered in order to investigate a genetic inherited etiology and to provide more information regarding medical management and future risks related cancers. Benefits, limitations and implications of the results were discussed and the patient consented to have testing for a panel of genes associated with early onset polyposis. Genetic testing was done at Invitae and the following genes were evaluated for sequence changes and exonic deletions/duplications: APC, BMPR1A, CDH1, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, MUTYH, PMS2, PTEN, SMAD4, STK11, TP53. Test results were negative with no pathogenic changes detected in the genes analysed thru next generation sequencing. Therefore, the cause of the patient́s condition remains unknown. Caution should be taken in interpreting the results since a negative test result reduces but does not eliminate the possibility that the patient’s condition has a genetic component. She finally underwent open surgery with intraoperative enteroscopy and resection of all the remaining lesions of the duodenum and the small bowel with segmental resections and extended lymphadenectomy with primary anastomoses. Biopsy was positive for adenocarcinoma in six tumors, all positive lesions had well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. The tumors infiltrated up the muscular layer without vascular or perineural penetration and without any compromise of lymph nodes. All tumor borders were free of malignancy and 46 harvested lymph nodes were negative. The patient was staged as T2N0M0 and the oncologic committee decided only follow-up. Control PET-CT after three years is negative for recurrence.

Discussion

SBA appears mainly in the sixth and seventh decade of life. The most common locations are the duodenum, followed by the jejunum and ileum. Predisposing factors include adenomas, Crohn disease, celiac sprue, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) [3,4]. Some pathologic similarities have been identified between colorectal and small bowel adenocarcinoma suggesting similar genetic pathways in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence with mutations in the K-ras, p53 and mismatch repair genes [5]. Its clinical presentation is often of advanced disease and requires a high index of suspicion including abdominal pain, distension and palpable mass. There is an average delay in the diagnosis around 6–8 months, with most of the patients detected at an advanced stage [6]. They can also present with gastrointestinal bleeding and anemia, obstruction, nausea/vomiting, and weight loss [5,6]. There are several diagnostic techniques used, including radiologic (CT, MRI, PET-CT) and endoscopic approaches (enteroscopy, videocapsule) that are usually combined for a more accurate evaluation and diagnosis. The cornerstone of treatment remains surgical, ranging from segmental resections to Whipple procedure. Prognostic factors include advance age, male sex, high cancer stage, residual tumor, distal location and lymph node involvement, being the last the most important one. The 5-year survival is poor and depends on tumor stage: 50%–60% for stage I, 39%–55% for stage II, 10%–40% for stage III and 3%–5% for stage IV [7]. The benefit of adjuvant therapy is unknown because of the nature of retrospective studies and relative small amount of patients receiving it. The most used chemotherapy regimen in the past was based in fluorouracil with modest results. Drugs like oxaliplatin and capecitabine are showing better outcome and a prospective international randomized trial (BALLAD) is being carried to assess its efficacy [7]. Radiotherapy has been described in cases of duodenal tumors with positive margins.

Conclusion

Multiple SBA is a rare condition with only few reports in the literature [[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Most of these cases occurs in elder patients and some of them associated with known risk factors. Our case differs in the young age of the patient and lack of known predisposing factors that might explain its appearance. Multiple diagnostic studies were used to determine the exact location and quantity of lesions before definitive treatment, showing that there isn’t one single study to accurately stage the patient. Surgery with segmental resections was consider the main treatment leaving adjuvant therapy due to the lack of poor prognostic factors and lack of real benefit opting for an expectant management.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflict of interests.

Funding source

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical approval

Our institution has exempted ethical approval. We have informed consent of the patient for the presentation of this case.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request.

Author contribution

Cavalla C, Oppliger F surgeons and designed the report. Castiblanco A, performed the histopathology analysis. Margarit S performed the genetic analysis. Valderrama R. gastrointestinal physician, Schiappacasse G collected the patient’s clinical data. Oppliger F, Cavalla C analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Guarantor

Cristián Cavalla and Federico Oppliger.
  11 in total

1.  Peutz-jeghers syndrome with synchronous adenocarcinoma arising from ileal polyps.

Authors:  Mohit Sharma; Rachhpal Singh; Anumeet Singh Grover
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 2.  Malignant tumours of the small intestine.

Authors:  Ian Reynolds; Paul Healy; Deborah A Mcnamara
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 3.  Synchronous mucinous colonic adenocarcinoma and multiple small intestinal adenocarcinomas: report of a case and review of literature.

Authors:  Antonio Corvino; Fabio Corvino; Leonardo Radice; Orlando Catalano
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.605

Review 4.  Primary segmental and multiple adenocarcinomas of the small bowel.

Authors:  Pei-Tu Ren; Hong Fu
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  [Primary adenocarcinoma of the terminal ileum, synchronous].

Authors:  René Francisco Candia-de la Rosa; Raúl Sampayo-Candia; José Christian Bretón-Toral; Francisco Candia-Archundia; Raúl Candia-García
Journal:  Cir Cir       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 0.361

6.  Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel: presentation, prognostic factors, and outcome of 217 patients.

Authors:  Bouthaina S Dabaja; Dima Suki; Barbara Pro; Mark Bonnen; Jaffer Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Adenocarcinoma of the small bowel at a single Korean institute: management and prognosticators.

Authors:  Yong Wha Moon; Sun Young Rha; Sang Joon Shin; Hyun Chang; Hyo Sup Shim; Jae Kyung Roh
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Aparicio; Aziz Zaanan; Florence Mary; Pauline Afchain; Sylvain Manfredi; Thomas Ronald Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 9.  Small bowel adenocarcinoma and Crohn's disease: any further ahead than 50 years ago?

Authors:  Caitlin Cahill; Philip H Gordon; Andrea Petrucci; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Lifestyle factors and small intestine adenocarcinoma risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caoimhe M Bennett; Helen G Coleman; Philip G Veal; Marie M Cantwell; Charlotte C L Lau; Liam J Murray
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.984

View more
  1 in total

1.  Misdiagnosis of multiple synchronous small bowel adenocarcinomas as intestinal tuberculosis: a case report.

Authors:  Qiwei Li; Tao Chen; Hexi Cui; Xiao Xiao; Chunqiu Chen; Zhenyu Shen; Fu Ji; Lu Yin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.