| Literature DB >> 29322917 |
Kai-Yao Huang1,2, Tzu-Hao Chang3, Jhih-Hua Jhong1, Yu-Hsiang Chi1, Wen-Chi Li1, Chien-Lung Chan4,5, K Robert Lai1,5, Tzong-Yi Lee6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anti-microbial peptides (AMPs), naturally encoded by genes and generally containing 12-100 amino acids, are crucial components of the innate immune system and can protect the host from various pathogenic bacteria and viruses. In recent years, the widespread use of antibiotics has resulted in the rapid growth of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms that often induce critical infection and pathogenesis. Recently, the advent of high-throughput technologies has led molecular biology into a data surge in both the amount and scope of data. For instance, next-generation sequencing technology has been applied to generate large-scale sequencing reads from foods, water, soil, air, and specimens to identify microbiota and their functions based on metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, respectively. In addition, oolong tea is partially fermented and is the most widely produced tea in Taiwan. Many studies have shown the benefits of oolong tea in inhibiting obesity, reducing dental plaque deposition, antagonizing allergic immune responses, and alleviating the effects of aging. However, the microbes and their functions present in oolong tea remain unknown.Entities:
Keywords: Amp; Antimicrobial peptide; Metagenomics; Metatranscriptomics; Next-generation sequencing; Oolong teas
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29322917 PMCID: PMC5763296 DOI: 10.1186/s12918-017-0503-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Syst Biol ISSN: 1752-0509
Fig. 1Analytical flowchart of the integrated metagenomic and metatranscriptomic pipeline
Data statistics of validated AMPs in different functional types
| Functional type | Number of AMPs |
|---|---|
| Antibacterial | 3273 |
| Anti-Gram (+) | 2684 |
| Anti-Gram (−) | 2482 |
| Antifungal | 1563 |
| Antiviral | 286 |
| Antiparasitic | 111 |
| Total | 4744 |
Fig. 2Bacterial communities in four tea samples using 16S metagenomic data
Abundance (number of reads) of bacterial 16S rRNA at the family level for all tea samples
| Family | Dayuling tea | Alishan tea | Jinxuan tea | Oriental Beauty tea | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reads | % | Reads | % | Reads | % | Reads | % | |
| Actinomycetaceae | 35 | 0.10% | 13 | 0.10% | 4 | 0.00% | 7 | 0.10% |
| Corynebacteriaceae | 7 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% |
| Dietziaceae | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Microbacteriaceae | 18 | 0.10% | 8 | 0.10% | 9 | 0.10% | 15 | 0.20% |
| Micrococcaceae | 19 | 0.10% | 1 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.00% | 6 | 0.10% |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | 17 | 0.10% | 1 | 0.00% | 12 | 0.10% | 5 | 0.10% |
| Coriobacteriaceae | 12 | 0.00% | 9 | 0.10% | 18 | 0.20% | 73 | 0.80% |
| Bacteroidaceae | 7783 | 26.20% | 2841 | 21.70% | 1660 | 19.90% | 771 | 8.50% |
| Porphyromonadaceae | 474 | 1.60% | 60 | 0.50% | 70 | 0.80% | 63 | 0.70% |
| Prevotellaceae | 704 | 2.40% | 70 | 0.50% | 1715 | 20.50% | 1918 | 21.10% |
| Rikenellaceae | 2 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 5 | 0.10% | 6 | 0.10% |
| Flavobacteriaceae | 116 | 0.40% | 255 | 1.90% | 15 | 0.20% | 135 | 1.50% |
| Sphingobacteriaceae | 31 | 0.10% | 5 | 0.00% | 8 | 0.10% | 40 | 0.40% |
| Deinococcaceae | 0 | 0.00% | 14 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Bacillaceae | 20 | 0.10% | 7 | 0.10% | 2 | 0.00% | 6 | 0.10% |
| Staphylococcaceae | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Aerococcaceae | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Carnobacteriaceae | 31 | 0.10% | 19 | 0.10% | 3 | 0.00% | 11 | 0.10% |
| Lactobacillaceae | 7 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 17 | 0.20% |
| Leuconostocaceae | 7 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Streptococcaceae | 557 | 1.90% | 137 | 1.00% | 86 | 1.00% | 106 | 1.20% |
| Clostridiaceae | 917 | 3.10% | 387 | 3.00% | 326 | 3.90% | 330 | 3.60% |
| Clostridiales Family XI. Incertae Sedis | 13 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 36 | 0.40% |
| Eubacteriaceae | 1115 | 3.80% | 453 | 3.50% | 339 | 4.10% | 986 | 10.80% |
| Lachnospiraceae | 1416 | 4.80% | 1488 | 11.40% | 834 | 10.00% | 1125 | 12.40% |
| Oscillospiraceae | 17 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% |
| Peptostreptococcaceae | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.00% |
| Ruminococcaceae | 546 | 1.80% | 62 | 0.50% | 1006 | 12.10% | 503 | 5.50% |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | 24 | 0.10% | 12 | 0.10% | 5 | 0.10% | 233 | 2.60% |
| Acidaminococcaceae | 1003 | 3.40% | 64 | 0.50% | 1451 | 17.40% | 106 | 1.20% |
| Veillonellaceae | 8553 | 28.80% | 3487 | 26.60% | 338 | 4.00% | 878 | 9.70% |
| Fusobacteriaceae | 4621 | 15.60% | 2528 | 19.30% | 89 | 1.10% | 150 | 1.60% |
| Leptotrichiaceae | 23 | 0.10% | 18 | 0.10% | 1 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% |
| Caulobacteraceae | 0 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Aurantimonadaceae | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Bradyrhizobiaceae | 5 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 17 | 0.20% |
| Hyphomicrobiaceae | 9 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 38 | 0.40% |
| Methylobacteriaceae | 203 | 0.70% | 20 | 0.20% | 16 | 0.20% | 155 | 1.70% |
| Rhizobiaceae | 58 | 0.20% | 3 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.00% | 86 | 0.90% |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 64 | 0.20% | 18 | 0.10% | 3 | 0.00% | 210 | 2.30% |
| Burkholderiaceae | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% |
| Comamonadaceae | 14 | 0.00% | 6 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 45 | 0.50% |
| Oxalobacteraceae | 9 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 9 | 0.10% |
| Sutterellaceae | 114 | 0.40% | 547 | 4.20% | 129 | 1.50% | 100 | 1.10% |
| Neisseriaceae | 23 | 0.10% | 37 | 0.30% | 7 | 0.10% | 4 | 0.00% |
| Desulfovibrionaceae | 31 | 0.10% | 2 | 0.00% | 21 | 0.30% | 11 | 0.10% |
| Campylobacteraceae | 4 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% |
| Succinivibrionaceae | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 19 | 0.20% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Shewanellaceae | 122 | 0.40% | 20 | 0.20% | 16 | 0.20% | 194 | 2.10% |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 142 | 0.50% | 258 | 2.00% | 53 | 0.60% | 62 | 0.70% |
| Halomonadaceae | 384 | 1.30% | 68 | 0.50% | 40 | 0.50% | 481 | 5.30% |
| Oceanospirillaceae | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Pasteurellaceae | 142 | 0.50% | 91 | 0.70% | 9 | 0.10% | 69 | 0.80% |
| Moraxellaceae | 15 | 0.10% | 59 | 0.50% | 3 | 0.00% | 48 | 0.50% |
| Pseudomonadaceae | 267 | 0.90% | 8 | 0.10% | 11 | 0.10% | 17 | 0.20% |
| Piscirickettsiaceae | 7 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
| Xanthomonadaceae | 3 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 13 | 0.10% |
| Mycoplasmataceae | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% |
Kingdom taxonomic analysis of metatranscriptomic data
| Raw reads | QC reads | QC% |
| Viridiplantae | Bacteria | Fungi | Viruses | Others | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayuling tea | 41,894,931 | 18,100,972 | 43.21 | 458,281 | 11,761,339 | 125,475 | 318,656 | 12,841 | 1,406,717 |
| Alishan tea | 41,152,352 | 27,498,256 | 66.82 | 1,004,044 | 18,979,598 | 425,288 | 831,025 | 23,668 | 1,077,615 |
| Jinxuan tea | 42,728,182 | 21,780,331 | 50.97 | 276,372 | 13,713,125 | 94,797 | 550,722 | 3855 | 2,167,244 |
| Oriental Beauty tea | 40,654,255 | 13,566,160 | 33.37 | 349,091 | 4,940,454 | 1,392,988 | 1,047,815 | 134,282 | 1,711,734 |
Fig. 3Kingdom assignments of four tea samples using total transcripts
Fig. 4Taxonomic distribution of all bacterial transcripts at family level based on metatranscriptomics analysis
Shannon’s diversity index of bacterial communities in four oolong teas
| Data type | Dayuling | Alishan | Jinxuan | Oriental beauty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metagenomic Data | 2.92 | 2.73 | 3.34 | 3.79 |
| Metatranscriptomic Data | 1.76 | 1.19 | 1.66 | 3.08 |
Fig. 5Distribution of COG functional annotations of all bacterial transcripts
Fig. 6Intensity of top 20 highly-expressed genes in the dominant bacterial species
Fig. 7GO analysis and KEGG analysis of transcripts of the dominant bacterial species: a Biological process, b Cellular component, c Molecular function, and d KEGG pathway
Data statistics of total RNA reads for AMPs mapping
| Dayuling | Alishan | Jinxuan | Oriental beauty | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of mapped reads (%) | 8194 (6.5%) | 26,220 (6.1%) | 5703 (5.8%) | 106,183 (7.8%) |
| Number of AMPs | 876 | 1130 | 761 | 1678 |
Fig. 8Data distribution of total RNA reads mapped to AMPs in four Taiwanese oolong teas
Fig. 9The distribution of anti-gram-positive and anti-gram-negative AMPs is highly correlated with the distribution of gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial in four oolong tea samples
Number of RNA reads for mapping different functional types of AMP in Oriental Beauty tea
| Family | Reads mapped to Anti-Gram (+) | Reads mapped to Anti-Gram (−) |
|---|---|---|
| Moraxellaceae | 420 | 399 |
| Pseudomonadaceae | 409 | 179 |
| Sphingomonadaceae | 377 | 358 |
| Enterobacteriaceae | 369 | 251 |
| Bacillaceae | 234 | 81 |
| Sphingobacteriaceae | 166 | 160 |
| Oxalobacteraceae | 164 | 157 |
| Burkholderiaceae | 151 | 109 |
| Methylobacteriaceae | 150 | 142 |
| Caulobacteraceae | 149 | 20 |
| Micrococcaceae | 117 | 109 |
| Propionibacteriaceae | 117 | 73 |