| Literature DB >> 29322110 |
Hari Prasad Ratnapuram1, S S Vutukuru1, Rajasri Yadavalli1.
Abstract
Influence of mixotrophic mode and its transition to various trophic modes under stress conditions was assessed during two stage cultivation of <span class="Species">Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Significant <span class="Chemical">lipid productivity was triggered under low light intensity, glucose + bicarbonate supplementation and nitrogen starvation. The association between biomass and lipid productivity, fatty acid composition during mixotrophic transition was critically evaluated. Biomass in growth phase (GP) and stress phase (SP) was 6.14 g/l and 5.14 g/l, respectively, in mixotrophic mode. Higher lipid productivity of 284 g/kg and 154.3 g/kg of neutral lipids was achieved in SP in mixotrophic-mixotrophic (MM) and mixotrophic-heterotrophic (MH) modes, respectively. Stress conditions resulted in high unsaturated fatty acid methyl esters in MH mode. In addition, neutral lipid content was 58% in MH and 52% in MM, that can be attributed to carbon source that is supplemented even in stress phase. Exploring such novel strategies can generate sustainable avenues for biodiesel production.Entities:
Keywords: Bioengineering; Biotechnology; Environmental science
Year: 2018 PMID: 29322110 PMCID: PMC5756060 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00496
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Conditions for growth and stress phase with organic and inorganic carbon source in various modes of cultivation.
| Mode of nutrition | Growth phase conditions (BG11 medium) under 60 μmol m−2 s−1 | Stress phase conditions (BG11 medium-N) under 30 μmol m−2 s−1 |
|---|---|---|
| MA | Glucose–3 g/l+NaHCO3(3 g/L) | Glucose–0 g/l |
| MH | Glucose–3 g/l+NaHCO3(3 g/L) | Glucose–6 g/l |
| MM | Glucose–3 g/l+NaHCO3(3 g/L) | Glucose–3 g/l + NaHCO3(3 g/L) |
| AM | Glucose–0 g/l | Glucose–3 g/l + NaHCO3(3 g/L) |
| HM | Glucose–6 g/l | Glucose–3 g/l + NaHCO3(3 g/L) |
(MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition).
Fig. 1Experimental methodology implemented for two stage trophic transition in C. pyrenoidosa.
Fig. 2Biomass growth rate of C. pyrenoidosa in Growth and Stress phases. (MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition; GP = growth phase; SP = stress phase).
Fig. 3Total chlorophyll content in various trophic conditions of C. pyrenoidosa. (MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition).
Fig. 4(a) Uptake of nitrates by C. pyrenoidosa in growth phase. (b) Phosphate utilization of C. pyrenoidosa in growth phase. (MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition).
Fig. 5(a) Carbohydrate accumulation in various trophic transition modes of C. pyrenoidosa. (b) Lipid accumulation in C. pyrenoidosa at the end of stress phase in various trophic transition modes. (MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition).
Fig. 6(a) Biomass Vs total lipid productivity in various trophic transition modes of C. pyrenoidosa. (b) Biomass Vs neutral lipid productivity in various trophic transition modes of C. Pyrenoidosa. (MA = mixotrophic to autotrophic mode transition; MH = mixotrophic to Heterotrophic mode transition; MM = Mixotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; AM = autotrophic to mixotrophic mode transition; HM = Heterotrophic to Autotrophic mode transition).
Composition of FAME in MH and MM modes.
| S.no | Fattyacid | Formula | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MH | MM | |||
| 1 | Palmitic | C16:0 | 31.3 ± 1.2 | 28 ± 1.3 |
| 2 | Stearic | C18:0 | 11 ± 0.9 | 8 ± 0.7 |
| 3 | Arachidic acid | C20:0 | – | 12 ±0.6 |
| 4 | Myristoleic acid | 14:01 | 14.2 ±1.0 | – |
| 5 | Palmitoleic acid | 16:01 | 9 ± 0.8 | 10.6 ± 0.89 |
| 6 | Oleic acid | 18:01 | 14.4 ± 0.98 | 17.4 ± 0.79 |
| 7 | Eicosenoic acid | 20:1 | – | 6.3 ± 0.77 |
| 8 | Linolic acid | 18:02 | 16.3 ± 0.99 | 4.4 ± 0.07 |
| 9 | Eicosadienoic acid | 20:02 | – | 8.2 ± 0.09 |
| 10 | Docosadienoic acid | 22:02 | – | 2 ± 0.04 |
| 11 | Alpha-Linolenic acid | 18:03 | 2 ± 0.04 | 1.7 ± 0.02 |
| 12 | gamma linolenic acid | 18:03 | 1.7 ± 0.04 | – |
| 13 | Arachidonic acid | 20:04 | – | 1.2 ± 0.01 |
| Total | 99.7 | 99.8 | ||