| Literature DB >> 29321812 |
Zhiqiang Xia1,2, Shengkui Zhang1,2, Mingfu Wen1, Cheng Lu1, Yufang Sun1, Meiling Zou1,2, Wenquan Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As an important biofuel plant, the demand for higher yield Jatropha curcas L. is rapidly increasing. However, genetic analysis of Jatropha and molecular breeding for higher yield have been hampered by the limited number of molecular markers available.Entities:
Keywords: Fruit yield; Jatropha curcas; QTL analysis; Ultrahigh-density linkage map
Year: 2018 PMID: 29321812 PMCID: PMC5759280 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-017-1004-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Distribution and statistics of SNP and indel markers on the linkage groups of the Jatropha HY genetic map from the “YN049X” and “HN001-31-1” cross
| Linkage groups (LG) | Number of markers | LG length (cM) | Average distance (cM) |
|---|---|---|---|
| LG1 | 212 | 122.51 | 0.578 |
| LG2 | 373 | 109.10 | 0.292 |
| LG3 | 250 | 68.67 | 0.275 |
| LG4 | 249 | 170.31 | 0.684 |
| LG5 | 286 | 76.20 | 0.266 |
| LG6 | 664 | 115.35 | 0.174 |
| LG7 | 484 | 153.40 | 0.317 |
| LG8 | 291 | 258.60 | 0.889 |
| LG9 | 210 | 87.86 | 0.418 |
| LG10 | 183 | 92.13 | 0.503 |
| LG11 | 220 | 126.45 | 0.575 |
| Total | 3422 | 1380.58 | 0.403 |
Fig. 1Integrated Jatropha genetic map constructed using SNP and indel markers. LGs are the linkage groups. The scale on the left indicates map distance in centimorgans. The darker bands indicate the markers
Fig. 2A principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of yield traits for the Jatropha HY population
Repeatable QTLs mapped for yield traits in Jatropha
| QTL name | Trait | LGa | Position (cM) | Flanking markers | 99% CI (cM)d | LOD | Effect | Estimatedinterval size (cM) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qNF-1 | NFb | 1 | 94.67 | KK914295.1_173222 | 93.88–95.93 | 5.273 | 18.967 | Add | 2.05 |
| qNF-2a | NF | 2 | 27.92 | KK914286.1_1650230 | 26.95–27.92 | 6.567 | 19.367 | Add | 0.97 |
| qNF-2b | NF | 2 | 81.51 | KK914708.1_14953 | 81.4–81.55 | 6.733 | 19.333 | Add | 0.15 |
| qNF-2c | NF | 2 | 83.5 | KK914399.1_1189397 | 83.23–83.58 | 5.367 | 18 | Add | 0.35 |
| qNF-3 | NF | 3 | 25.76 | KK914370.1_355263 | 25.58–26.05 | 5.52 | 18.033 | Add | 0.47 |
| qNF-4 | NF | 4 | 168.11 | KK915534.1_3177 | 167.29–168.11 | 5.093 | 18.033 | Rec | 0.82 |
| qNF-6 | NF | 6 | 71.94 | KK914342.1_53519 | 71.85–72.17 | 5.837 | 18.067 | Add | 0.32 |
| qNF-7a | NF | 7 | 143.62 | KK914970.1_774896 | 143.59–143.78 | 5.01 | 20.067 | Dom | 0.19 |
| qNF-7b | NF | 7 | 148.29 | KK914352.1_426180 | 148.29–148.31 | 5.11 | 20.967 | Dom | 0.02 |
| qNF-8 | NF | 8 | 253.78 | KK914383.1_100448 | 253.75–253.78 | 5.413 | 18.367 | Dom | 0.03 |
| qTWF-1 | TWFc | 1 | 94.67 | KK914295.1_173222 | 93.88–93.93 | 4.893 | 19.633 | Add | 0.05 |
| qTWF-2 | TWF | 2 | 81.51 | KK914708.1_14953 | 81.4–81.51 | 5.257 | 17.4 | Add | 0.11 |
| qTWF-3 | TWF | 3 | 25.76 | KK914370.1_355263 | 25.76–25.94 | 4.34 | 16.067 | Add | 0.18 |
Add additive effects, Rec recessive effects, Dom dominant effects
aLinkage group
bThe number of fruits
cThe total weight of fruits (g)
d99% confidence interval for QTL length (cM)
eProportion of phenotypic variation explained by each QTL
Fig. 3QTL mapping results. QTL mapping profiles for three yield traits, AFW (average fruit weight per fruit trait), NF (fruit number) and TWF (total fruit weight), with an LOD threshold of 4.3. The reQTLs were indicated by asterisks. Each of them were repeatable in three replicates and average
Fig. 4Candidate QTL genes in LG3 and LG6 for TWF and NF traits. a Candidate QTL gene NCED5. b Candidate QTL gene AMT2