| Literature DB >> 29321749 |
Peng-Wei Wang1,2, Huang-Chi Lin1,2, Yi-Hsin Connie Yang3, Chih-Yao Hsu4, Kuan-Sheng Chung4, Hung-Chi Wu5, Cheng-Fang Yen1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Both heroin use and depression are significant health problems. Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) can be of great benefit to heroin users. However, changes in the level of depression in heroin users during MMT are not clear. Gender and age are also important factors in the development of depression, and whether gender and age moderate changes in depression in heroin users during MMT warrants further study. This study aimed to explore: (1) the trajectory of depression in opioid users during MMT and (2) the moderating effects of gender and age on the trajectory of depression in opioid users receiving MMT.Entities:
Keywords: addiction; age; depression; gender; methadone; opioid; trajectory
Year: 2017 PMID: 29321749 PMCID: PMC5733537 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00288
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1Latent growth model of the level of depression in heroin users undergoing methadone maintenance treatment.
Epidemiology, level of depression, and dosage of methadone among the three hospitals.
| Gender (male) | 64 (92.75) | 61 (88.41) | 132 (84.62) | 0.228 |
| Age (years) | 38.3 (7.63) | 39.96 (7.47) | 38.76 (7.74) | 0.534 |
| Education (years) | 9.78 (1.95) | 9.74 (2.54) | 10.12 (2.13) | 0.382 |
| At intake | 24.37 (12.94) | 21.42 (11.32) | 20.99 (11.02) | 0.315 |
| At end of the first 3 months | 18.01 (11.75) | 16.06 (9.70) | 15.61 (9.59) | 0.263 |
| At end of the second 3 months | 17.71 (12.52) | 14.72 (10.67) | 15.63 (10.22) | 0.254 |
| At end of the third 3 months | 16.96 (11.66) | 14.72 (10.46) | 14.90 (10.19) | 0.352 |
| First 3-month period | 50.07 (24.53) | 53.84 (28.65) | 48.93 (33.32) | 0.536 |
| Second 3-month period | 58.48 (36.32) | 61.96 (36.30) | 55.16 (27.42) | 0.326 |
| Third 3-month period | 56.96 (29.87) | 59.86 (32.28) | 53.85 (26.46) | 0.335 |
.
Level of depression and dosage of methadone at each follow-up point for heroin users.
| Total participants, mean (SD) ( | Male participants, mean (SD) ( | Female participants, mean (SD) ( | Effect size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At intake | 21.76 (11.54) | 20.91 (11.29) | 28.83 (11.74) | 0.69 | 14.825 | <0.001 |
| At end of the first 3 months | 16.29 (10.31) | 16.00 (10.12) | 18.43 (10.53) | 0.24 | 3.355 | 0.068 |
| At end of the second 3 months | 15.91 (10.93) | 15.60 (10.91) | 18.54 (11.07) | 0.30 | 3.849 | 0.051 |
| At end of the third 3 months | 15.34 (10.75) | 14.82 (10.67) | 18.62 (9.69) | 0.40 | 7.957 | 0.005 |
| First 3-month period | 56.25 (29.24) | 55.80 (28.86) | 62.57 (31.52) | 0.23 | 1.936 | 0.165 |
| Second 3-month period | 57.55 (31.97) | 57.12 (31.89) | 60.54 (32.83) | 0.11 | 0.486 | 0.486 |
| Third 3-month period | 55.99 (28.73) | 55.95 (28.84) | 56.22 (28.34) | 0.01 | 0.004 | 0.947 |
.
.
Figure 2Moderating effects on the trajectory of depression in heroin users according to the latent growth model. *<0.05; **<0.01; ***<0.001.