Eda Çoban1, Dursun Kirbaş2, Dilek Atakli1, Aysun Soysal1. 1. Clinic of Neurology, Bakırköy Education and Training Hospital of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, İstanbul, Turkey. 2. Department of Forensic Medicine, İstanbul University Cerrahpaşa School of Medicine, Forensic Medicine Institute, İstanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardioembolic stroke is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with an increased risk of recurrent stroke. Oral anticoagulation is highly effective in reducing the risk of stroke and mortality compared with placebo. Our study aimed to highlight the safety and efficacy of warfarin by analyzing the 20-year follow-up of patients on warfarin therapy. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed with ischemic stroke patients receiving warfarin at our stroke polyclinic between 1992 and 2012. The CHADS2 scoring system was used to assess the annual risk of stroke, and a bleeding risk score termed the HAS-BLED scoring system was calculated to estimate the risk of bleeding. RESULTS: In our study, 394 patients who were receiving warfarin therapy were included. The patients' median age was 66.35±13.602 years. The median follow-up period of the patients was 4.85±3.572 years. During follow-up, 79.9% of the patients revealed no complication on warfarin therapy. Thirty-seven patients had hemorrhagic complications; among these, 33 had systemic complications (including nose bleeding, hematuria, hematochezia) and 4 patients had intracerebral bleeding. The INR value related to hemorrhagic complications was >2.5 in 75.8% of 33 patients having systemic bleeding and in 75% of 4 patients having intracerebral bleeding. The HAS-BLED risk score was >3 in 72.7% of the patients experiencing systemic bleeding complications. Forty-one patients had a recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA during the follow-up. Of this patient group, the INR value at the time of recurrent ischemic stroke was <2 in 41 patients (92.7%), while the CHADS2 risk score was low in this group. Sixty-eight patients were receiving antiplatelet therapy with warfarin. In these groups, 16 patients experienced a complication during the follow-up (bleeding/ischemic), while 10 patients had bleeding complications (systemic and intracerebral). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of warfarin depend on maintaining its dose at sufficient levels to keep the patient's INR within the therapeutic range.
INTRODUCTION: Cardioembolic stroke is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with an increased risk of recurrent stroke. Oral anticoagulation is highly effective in reducing the risk of stroke and mortality compared with placebo. Our study aimed to highlight the safety and efficacy of warfarin by analyzing the 20-year follow-up of patients on warfarin therapy. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed with ischemic stroke patients receiving warfarin at our stroke polyclinic between 1992 and 2012. The CHADS2 scoring system was used to assess the annual risk of stroke, and a bleeding risk score termed the HAS-BLED scoring system was calculated to estimate the risk of bleeding. RESULTS: In our study, 394 patients who were receiving warfarin therapy were included. The patients' median age was 66.35±13.602 years. The median follow-up period of the patients was 4.85±3.572 years. During follow-up, 79.9% of the patients revealed no complication on warfarin therapy. Thirty-seven patients had hemorrhagic complications; among these, 33 had systemic complications (including nose bleeding, hematuria, hematochezia) and 4 patients had intracerebral bleeding. The INR value related to hemorrhagic complications was >2.5 in 75.8% of 33 patients having systemic bleeding and in 75% of 4 patients having intracerebral bleeding. The HAS-BLED risk score was >3 in 72.7% of the patients experiencing systemic bleeding complications. Forty-one patients had a recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA during the follow-up. Of this patient group, the INR value at the time of recurrent ischemic stroke was <2 in 41 patients (92.7%), while the CHADS2 risk score was low in this group. Sixty-eight patients were receiving antiplatelet therapy with warfarin. In these groups, 16 patients experienced a complication during the follow-up (bleeding/ischemic), while 10 patients had bleeding complications (systemic and intracerebral). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the effectiveness and safety of warfarin depend on maintaining its dose at sufficient levels to keep the patient's INR within the therapeutic range.
Authors: Ron Pisters; Deirdre A Lane; Robby Nieuwlaat; Cees B de Vos; Harry J G M Crijns; Gregory Y H Lip Journal: Chest Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; Davis S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; G Neal Kay; Jean-Yves Le Huezey; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; L Samuel Wann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: John A Cairns; Stuart Connolly; Sean McMurtry; Michael Stephenson; Mario Talajic Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: A John Camm; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Y H Lip; Ulrich Schotten; Irene Savelieva; Sabine Ernst; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Nawwar Al-Attar; Gerhard Hindricks; Bernard Prendergast; Hein Heidbuchel; Ottavio Alfieri; Annalisa Angelini; Dan Atar; Paolo Colonna; Raffaele De Caterina; Johan De Sutter; Andreas Goette; Bulent Gorenek; Magnus Heldal; Stefan H Hohloser; Philippe Kolh; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Piotr Ponikowski; Frans H Rutten Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Mark A Crandall; Benjamin D Horne; John D Day; Jeffrey L Anderson; Joseph B Muhlestein; Brian G Crandall; J Peter Weiss; Jeffrey S Osborne; Donald L Lappé; T Jared Bunch Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 1.976