| Literature DB >> 29321001 |
Minh Huong Phu Ly1,2,3, Meng Ling Moi4, Thi Bich Hau Vu5, Mya Myat Ngwe Tun1, Todd Saunders2,3, Cam Nhat Nguyen6, Anh Kieu Thi Nguyen6, Hung Manh Nguyen6, Than Huu Dao6, Do Quyen Pham5, Thi Thu Thuy Nguyen5, Thi Quynh Mai Le5, Futoshi Hasebe7, Kouichi Morita1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antibodies are critical responses to protect the host from dengue virus(DENV) infection. Antibodies target DENV by two pathologic mechanisms: virus neutralization and infection enhancement. In dengue patients, the absence of neutralizing activity in the presence of FcγR implies that infection-enhancing activity hampers the neutralizing activity of antibodies, which could potentially lead to symptomatic presentations and severe clinical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Dengue virus (DENV); Dengue virus neutralizing antibody; Monotypic, heterotypic immune response; Primary DENV infection; Secondary DENV infection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29321001 PMCID: PMC5763606 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2894-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Characteristic of the study population
| Variable | Total (n) | DENV IgG positive a N (%) | Crude OR | 95% C.I | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before dengue season | 100 | 34 c (34.00) | ||||
| Age group (years) | 20–30 | 74 | 20 (58.82) | 1.00 | 0.05 | |
| 30–40 | 22 | 12 (35.29) | 3.24 | 1.21–8.66 | ||
| ≥40 | 4 | 2 (5.88) | 2.70 | 0.35–20.48 | ||
| Gender | Male | 27 | 11 (32.35) | 1.00 | ||
| Female | 73 | 23 (67.65) | 0.67 | 0.27–1.68 | 0.39 | |
| DENV IgM b | Negative | 94 | 34 c (100.00) | |||
| Positive | 6 | 0 (00.00) | ||||
| After dengue season | 100 | 52 d (52.00) | ||||
| Age group (years) | 20–30 | 74 | 35 (67.31) | 1.00 | 0.25 | |
| 30–40 | 22 | 14 (26.92) | 1.95 | 0.73–5.20 | ||
| ≥40 | 4 | 3 (5.77) | 3.34 | 0.33–33.63 | ||
| Gender | Male | 27 | 19 (36.54) | 1.00 | 0.02 | |
| Female | 73 | 33 (63.46) | 0.34 | 0.13–0.92 | ||
| DENV IgM b | Negative | 82 | 40 (76.92) | 1.00 | ||
| Positive | 18 | 12 (23.08) | 2.10 | 0.71–6.23 | 0.17 |
Crude OR Crude odds ratio, 95% C.I 95% confidence interval
a DENV IgG result was as determined by using in-house DENV IgG Elisa and DENV IgG indirect Elisa (Panbio)
b DENV IgM result was determined by using an in-house DENV IgM Elisa test
c These 34 individuals were considered as asymptomatic secondary infection (S.I) cases
d Out of 52 individuals, 34 had DENV IgG before the dengue season and continue to have elevated DENV IgG after the dengue season, the remain 18 had only DENV IgG after the dengue season
Comparison of DENV IgG titer in 100 individuals before and after the dengue season
| Variable | Mean | t-value | S.D | 95% C.I | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 28.06 (21–52) | 5.41 | ||||
| IgG titer pre | M (27) | 6149.93 | 10190.48 | 2118.71–10181.15 | ||
| F (73) | 4679.02 | 9138.45 | 2546.86–6811.18 | |||
| t-test | 0.69 | 0.49 | ||||
| IgG titer post | M (27) | 13455.84 | 23757.02 | 4057.88–22853.80 | ||
| F (73) | 7187.98 | 13360.80 | 4070.68–10305.29 | |||
| t-test | 1.66 | 0.10 | ||||
| IgG titer pre | 5076.17 | 9404.20 | 3210.17–6942.17 | |||
| IgG titer post | 8880.30 | 16907.77 | 5525.44–12235.17 | |||
| t-test | 2.53 | 0.01 |
IgG titer pre: IgG titer from 100 healthy individuals before exposure to the dengue season
IgG titer post: IgG titer from 100 healthy individuals after exposure to the dengue season
S.D Standard deviation
Fig. 1Overall analysis of neutralizing antibody titer in serum samples obtained from 100 healthy volunteer residents before (pre) and after (post) exposure to the dengue season in 2015 in Ha Noi. P-value determined by Fisher’s exact test. P value ≤0.05 = significant. Neutralizing antibody titers were determined on BHK cell line
Fig. 2Neutralizing antibody titer reacts to single or multiple DENV serotypes in 34 pair serum samples obtained from 34 individuals who were DENV IgG positive before the dengue season and demonstrated elevated DENV IgG after the season versus patient group. Neutralizing activity was determined by PRNT50 on BHK cells. Positive PRNT samples were defined as having a neutralizing titer ≥10 or Log2(PRNT50) ≥3.32 to any of the virus test (above dotted line). Non patient 1 = pre-dengue season group; Non patient 2 = post-dengue season group; Patient = confirmed DENV infected patient group. P-value was determined by t-test. P value ≤0.05 = significant. Comparison was performed between pre-dengue season group (Non patient 1) vs. patient group. The results were represented as means of Log2(N.A titers) ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD)
Fig. 3Fold-enhancement activity in 34 pair serum samples obtained from 34 individuals who were DENV IgG positive before the dengue season and demonstrated elevated DENV IgG after the season versus patient group. Fold enhancement value was determined by the ratio of (mean plaque count at 1:20 serum dilution)/(mean plaque count in the absence of human serum samples) by using FcγR expressing BHK cells. Dash line represents for cut-off plus 2 times SD value of infection-enhancement. Positive infection-enhancing activity was defined as fold enhancement value greater than cut-off value plus 2 times SD (above dash line). P-value was determined by Mann -Whitney test. P-value ≤0.05 = significant. NA-: Neutralizing antibody titer <10; NA+: Neutralizing antibody titer ≥10. Non patient 1 = pre-dengue season group; Non patient 2 = post-dengue season group; Patient = confirmed DENV infected patient group. The results were represented as Median ± interquartile range (Median ± IQR)
Fig. 4Comparison between possible past DENV infection in pre-exposure group vs. patient group for neutralizing antibody titer and fold enhancement. a & c: Non patient 1 = serum samples from pre-exposure group with possible infecting serotype of DENV-2 (based on the highest N.A titer reacts to DENV-2); Patient = serum samples from patient group with infecting serotype of DENV-2 (virology confirmation). b & d: Non patient 1 = serum samples from pre-exposure group with possible infecting serotype of DENV-3 (based on the highest N.A titer reacts to DENV-3); Patient = serum samples from patient group with infecting serotype of DENV3 (virology confirm). Fold enhancement value was determined by the ratio of (mean plaque count at 1:20 serum dilution)/(mean plaque count in the absence of human serum samples) by using FcγR-expressing BHK cells. Dash line represents for cut-off plus 2 times SD value of infection-enhancement. Positive infection-enhancing activity was defined as fold enhancement value greater than cut-off value plus 2 times SD (above dash line). P-value was determined by Mann-Whitney test. P-value ≤0.05 = significant. The results were represented as Median ± interquartile range (Median ± IQR)