| Literature DB >> 29320814 |
Maha M A Basyoni1, Hany Ahmed Fouad Elghobary2.
Abstract
Cystoisospora is responsible for morbidity in immunocompromised patients. PCR is sensitive for diagnosing Cystoisospora; however, it needs reevaluation for differential molecular diagnosis of cystoisosporiasis. We aimed at evaluating melting curve analysis (MCA) after real-time PCR (qPCR) in diagnosis and genotyping of Cystoisospora as an alternative to conventional PCR. We included 293 diarrheic stool samples of patients attending the Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine of Cairo University Hospitals, Egypt. Samples were subjected to microscopy, nested PCR (nPCR), and qPCR targeting the internal transcribed spacer 2 region (ITS2) of the ribosomal RNA (r RNA) gene followed by melting temperatures (Tms) analysis and comparing the results to PCR-RFLP banding patterns. Using microscopy and ITS2-nPCR, 3.1% and 5.8% of cases were Cystoisospora positive, respectively, while 10.9% were positive using qPCR. Genotyping of Cystoisospora by qPCR-MCA revealed 2 genotypes. These genotypes matched with 2 distinct melting peaks with specified Tms at 85.8°C and 88.6°C, which indicated genetic variation among Cystoisospora isolates in Egypt. Genotype II proved to be more prevalent (65.6%). HIV-related Kaposi sarcoma and leukemic patients harbored both genotypes with a tendency to genotype II. Genotype I was more prevalent in lymphomas and mammary gland tumors while colorectal and hepatocellular tumors harbored genotype II suggesting that this genotype might be responsible for the development of cystoisosporiasis in immunocompromised patients. Direct reliable identification and differentiation of Cystoisospora species could be established using qPCR-Tms analysis which is useful for rapid detection and screening of Cystoisospora genotypes principally in high risk groups.Entities:
Keywords: Cystoisospora; melting curve analysis; qPCR
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29320814 PMCID: PMC5776892 DOI: 10.3347/kjp.2017.55.6.601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Parasitol ISSN: 0023-4001 Impact factor: 1.341
Diagnostic yield of microscopy, nPCR, and qPCR-ITS2 in the studied group
| qPCR | nPCR | Microscopy | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||
| Positive | 17 | 15 | 9 | 23 | 32 |
|
| |||||
| Negative | 0 | 261 | 0 | 261 | 261 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 17 | 276 | 9 | 284 | 293 |
Fig. 1(A) Melting curve analysis of qPCR amplification products of Cystoisospora. The amplified DNA products represented as distinct melting peaks with specified Tms (88.6°C and 85.8°C). Each Tm corresponds to a specific genotype. (B) Melting curve of confirmed samples of Cystoisospora harboring genotype I showing distinct melting peaks at 85.8°C. (C) Melting curve of confirmed samples of Cystoisospora harboring genotype II showing distinct melting peaks at 88.6°C. (D) Melting curve of a confirmed sample of Cystoisospora harboring both genotypes II and I showing 2 distinct melting peaks at 88.6°C and 85.8°C, respectively.
Mean Tms of qPCR and RFLP product size of amplified Cystoisospora DNAs
| Genotype | No. (%) | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) | Confidence interval (99%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype I | 10 (31.3) | 85.8 | 55, 67 | 85.7–85.9 |
| Genotype II | 21 (65.6) | 88.6 | 130, 21 | 88.5–88.6 |
Confidence interval=Tm±t x s/✓n, where t=t statistic for n-1df, S=standard deviation, and n=number of replicates.
Fig. 2Agarose gel electrophoresis of RFLP profiles of ITS2 qPCR amplified Cystoisospora products using ALU I restriction enzyme. Lane M, 50 bp molecular weight marker; lane 1, confirmed sample (genotype II: 130 bp); lane 2, confirmed sample (genotype I: 67bp); lane 3, control.