Literature DB >> 29320483

Microarray analysis in pregnancies with isolated unilateral kidney agenesis.

Lena Sagi-Dain1, Idit Maya2, Amir Peleg1, Adi Reches3, Ehud Banne4, Hagit N Baris5, Tamar Tenne6, Amihood Singer7, Shay Ben-Shachar3.   

Abstract

BackgroundThe objective of our study was to examine the risk for submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations among fetuses with apparently isolated solitary kidney.MethodsData acquisition was performed retrospectively by searching Israeli Ministry of Health-computerized database. All cases having chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), referred because of an indication of isolated unilateral kidney agenesis between January 2013 and September 2016, were included. Rate of clinically significant CMA findings in these pregnancies was compared to pregnancies with normal ultrasound, based on a systematic review encompassing 9,792 cases and local data of 5,541 pregnancies undergoing CMA because of maternal request.ResultsOf the 81 pregnancies with isolated solitary kidney, 2 (2.47%) loss-of-copy number variants compatible with well-described deletion syndromes were reported (16p11.2-16p12.2 and 22q11.21 microdeletion syndromes). In addition, one variant of unknown significance was demonstrated. The relative risk for pathogenic CMA findings among pregnancies with isolated unilateral renal agenesis was not significantly different compared with the control population.ConclusionCMA analysis in pregnancies with unilateral renal agenesis might still be useful, to the same degree as it can be in the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29320483     DOI: 10.1038/pr.2018.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  23 in total

1.  Comparative genomic hybridisation shows a partial de novo deletion 16p11.2 in a neonate with multiple congenital malformations.

Authors:  C Hernando; A Plaja; M A Rigola; M M Pérez; T Vendrell; J Egocue; C Fuster
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  The 'skipped generation' phenomenon in a family with renal agenesis.

Authors:  R Pallotta; I Bucci; C Celentano; M Liberati; U Bellati
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Associated urological anomalies in children with unilateral renal agenesis.

Authors:  S Cascio; S Paran; P Puri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  A clinical study of patients with pericentromeric deletion and duplication within 16p12.2-p11.2.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Okamoto; Tatsuya Fujii; Junko Tanaka; Kazumasa Saito; Takeshi Matsui; Naoki Harada
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants.

Authors:  Hutton M Kearney; Erik C Thorland; Kerry K Brown; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Sarah T South
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Unilateral renal agenesis may result from in utero regression of multicystic renal dysplasia.

Authors:  H G Mesrobian; H G Rushton; D Bulas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Authors:  Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Kathleen E Sullivan; Bruno Marino; Nicole Philip; Ann Swillen; Jacob A S Vorstman; Elaine H Zackai; Beverly S Emanuel; Joris R Vermeesch; Bernice E Morrow; Peter J Scambler; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  ACMG Standards and Guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic microarray analysis, including postnatal and prenatal applications: revision 2013.

Authors:  Sarah T South; Charles Lee; Allen N Lamb; Anne W Higgins; Hutton M Kearney
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: a genetic disorder?

Authors:  Ihor V Yosypiv
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-20

Review 10.  The clinical utility of microarray technologies applied to prenatal cytogenetics in the presence of a normal conventional karyotype: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan L A Callaway; Lisa G Shaffer; Lyn S Chitty; Jill A Rosenfeld; John A Crolla
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 3.050

View more
  4 in total

1.  Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Emily Stonebrook; Monica Hoff; John David Spencer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2019-06-11

2.  Is an analysis of copy number variants necessary for various types of kidney ultrasound anomalies in fetuses?

Authors:  Shaobin Lin; Shanshan Shi; Linhuan Huang; Ting Lei; Danlei Cai; Wenlong Hu; Yi Zhou; Yanmin Luo
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Pregnancies With Corpus Callosum or Posterior Fossa Anomalies.

Authors:  Lior Greenbaum; Idit Maya; Lena Sagi-Dain; Rivka Sukenik-Halevy; Michal Berkenstadt; Hagith Yonath; Shlomit Rienstein; Adel Shalata; Eldad Katorza; Amihood Singer
Journal:  Neurol Genet       Date:  2021-05-28

Review 4.  Molecular Approaches in Fetal Malformations, Dynamic Anomalies and Soft Markers: Diagnostic Rates and Challenges-Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Gioia Mastromoro; Daniele Guadagnolo; Nader Khaleghi Hashemian; Enrica Marchionni; Alice Traversa; Antonio Pizzuti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.