Literature DB >> 29320320

MR Imaging and Cochlear Implants with Retained Internal Magnets: Reducing Artifacts near Highly Inhomogeneous Magnetic Fields.

Heidi A Edmonson1, Matthew L Carlson1, Alice C Patton1, Robert E Watson1.   

Abstract

The number of patients receiving cochlear implants and auditory brainstem implants for severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss has rapidly increased. These implants consist of an internal component implanted between the skull and the temporal scalp and an external removable speech processor unit. A small magnet within the internal component is commonly used to hold the external speech processor unit in place. Several cochlear implant models have recently received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Economic Area regulatory approval to allow magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations to be performed under certain specified conditions. The small internal magnet presents a challenge for imaging of the head and neck near the implant, creating a nonlinear magnetic field inhomogeneity and significant MR imaging artifacts. Fat-saturation failures and susceptibility artifacts severely degrade image quality. Typical artifacts at diffusion-weighted imaging and accelerated imaging are exacerbated. Each examination may require impromptu adjustments to allow visualization of the tissue or contrast of interest. Patients may also be quite uncomfortable during the examination, as a result of either imposed magnetic forces or a tight head wrap that is often applied to minimize internal magnet movement. Translational forces and torque sometimes displace the implanted magnet even when a head wrap is used. Diseases such as neurofibromatosis type 2 that are associated with bilateral vestibular schwannomas and hearing loss often require lifelong tumor surveillance with MR imaging. A collaborative team of radiologists, technologists, and/or medical physicists or MR imaging scientists, armed with strategies to mitigate artifacts near implanted magnets, can customize the examination for better visualization of tissue and consistent comparison examinations over time. ©RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29320320     DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018170135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Cochlear Implantation: An Overview.

Authors:  Nicholas L Deep; Eric M Dowling; Daniel Jethanamest; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-09-06

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging in children with implants.

Authors:  Camilo Jaimes; Diane Biaggotti; Gayathri Sreedher; Apeksha Chaturvedi; Michael M Moore; Amy R Danehy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-19

3.  Cochlear Implantation in Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Kent Tadokoro; Matthew Robert Bartindale; Nadeem El-Kouri; Dennis Moore; Christopher Britt; Matthew Kircher
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-06-08

4.  Cochlear Implantation in Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Matthew Robert Bartindale; Kent Sean Tadokoro; Matthew Lowell Kircher
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-01-08

5.  MRI-induced artifact by a cochlear implant with a novel magnet system: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  Pietro Canzi; Federico Aprile; Anna Simoncelli; Marco Manfrin; Marianna Magnetto; Elvis Lafe; Domenico Minervini; Irene Avato; Simone Terrani; Andrea Scribante; Dzemal Gazibegovic; Marco Benazzo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Dimensions and forms of artefacts in 1.5 T and 3 T MRI caused by cochlear implants.

Authors:  Timo M Gottfried; Daniel Dejaco; Natalie Fischer; Veronika Innerhofer; Lejo Johnson Chacko; Gerlig Widmann; Christian Kremser; Herbert Riechelmann; Joachim Schmutzhard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  The role of cochlear implant positioning on MR imaging quality: a preclinical in vivo study with a novel implant magnet system.

Authors:  Pietro Canzi; Marianna Magnetto; Anna Simoncelli; Marco Manfrin; Federico Aprile; Elvis Lafe; Elena Carlotto; Irene Avato; Andrea Scribante; Lorenzo Preda; Marco Benazzo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.