Literature DB >> 29319927

Which outcome measures should be used in stress urinary incontinence trials?

Renly Lim1,2, Men Long Liong3, Wing Seng Leong4, Kah Hay Yuen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review measures used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatments and to propose the most relevant outcome measure that should be included in future trials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified RCTs for SUI interventions published between January 2015 and July 2017. We listed the objective and subjective outcome measures used in eligible trials in the literature search. Using data from our RCT conducted from 2013 to 2016 evaluating pulsed magnetic stimulation for SUI, we analysed the correlation between all measures.
RESULTS: A total of 45 RCTs were included; 28 (62%) involved surgical interventions. The most frequently used objective and subjective measures were the cough stress test and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF), respectively. In all, 24 different validated questionnaires were administered in the 42 studies that used subjective outcome measure. Analyses of measures used in our trial showed that all measures were significantly correlated with each other except for pelvic floor muscle function. The ICIQ-UI SF showed the highest correlation coefficients (0.587-0.733) with all outcome measures.
CONCLUSION: The outcome measures used in recent trials were inconsistent. The ICIQ-UI SF had the highest correlation with all measures in our trial; however, further studies evaluating correlation of measures in other patient cohorts are needed to corroborate our present results. We propose the use of ICIQ-UI SF, as the most relevant outcome measure, in future trials evaluating efficacy of SUI interventions.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  outcome measures; randomised controlled trial; stress urinary incontinence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29319927     DOI: 10.1111/bju.14121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  5 in total

1.  Urinary incontinence status and risk factors in women aged 50-70 years: a cross-sectional study in Hunan, China.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Mingzhu Chen; Jingxia Fu; Yanting Meng; Si Qin; Yang Luo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  An Effective Meta-analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence.

Authors:  Qing He; Kaiwen Xiao; Liao Peng; Junyu Lai; Hong Li; Deyi Luo; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comprehensive Review of Effective Application of Questionnaires for Clinical Research on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms With Translation and Cultural Adaptation to the Korean Language.

Authors:  Jungyo Suh; Seung-June Oh; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

4.  Posterior Vaginoplasty With Perineoplasty: A Canadian Experience With Vaginal Tightening Surgery.

Authors:  Ryan E Austin; Frank Lista; Peter-George Vastis; Jamil Ahmad
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2019-10-15

5.  Laparoscopic resection rectopexy significantly affects preexisting urinary symptoms in female patients.

Authors:  Matthias Kraemer; Silvia Kraemer; Canan Ceran
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.