| Literature DB >> 29319720 |
Ricardo Pereira de Moraes1, Jorge Casseb1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence of depression and adherence to antiretroviral treatment in two groups of individuals: men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who have sex with women (MSW).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29319720 PMCID: PMC5738567 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2017(12)05
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Demographic data from 216 patients infected by HIV.
| Variables | MSM | MSW | Total | CI 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44.6±11.98 | 48±10.39 | 46.2±11.37 | [-6.38; -0.42] | ||
| ≤40 | 39 (33.6%) | 19 (19%) | 58 (26.9%) | [2.2%; 27.1%] | |
| ≥41 | 77 (66.4%) | 81 (81%) | 158 (73.1%) | [-27.1%; -2.2%] | |
| White | 85 (73.3%) | 67 (67%) | 152 (70.4%) | 0.39 | [-7.0%; 19.4%] |
| Mixed | 20 (17.2%) | 18 (18%) | 38 (17.6%) | 1 | [-11.7%; 10.2%] |
| Black | 11 (9.5%) | 8 (8%) | 19 (8.8%) | 0.87 | [-6.9%; 9.9%] |
| W/information | 0 (0%) | 7 (7%) | 7 (3.2%) | [-12.9%; -1.1%] | |
| Single | 100 (86.2%) | 38 (38%) | 138 (63.9%) | [35.9%; 60.5%] | |
| Married | 6 (5.1%) | 50 (50%) | 56 (25.9%) | [-56.4%; -33.3%] | |
| Separated | 1 (0.9%) | 5 (5%) | 6 (2.8%) | 0.09 | [-9.7%; 1.4%] |
| Divorced | 8 (6.9%) | 3 (3%) | 11 (5.1%) | 0.32 | [-2.7%; 10.5%] |
| W/information | 1 (0.9%) | 4 (4%) | 5 (2.3%) | 0.18 | [-8.3%; 2.0%] |
| until 05 | 8 (6.9%) | 9 (9%) | 17 (7.9%) | 0.75 | [-10,3%; 6,1%] |
| until 09 | 36 (31.1%) | 40 (40%) | 76 (35.2%) | 0.22 | [-22,7%; 4,7%] |
| more than 10 | 62 (53.4%) | 41 (41%) | 103 (47.7%) | 0.09 | [-1,7%; 26,6%] |
| W/information | 10 (8.6%) | 10 (10%) | 20 (9.2%) | 0.91 | [-10,0%; 7,3%] |
| | 85 (73.3%) | 9 (9%) | 94 (43.6%) | [53.5%; 75.0%] | |
| | 4 (3.4%) | 37 (37%) | 41 (19%) | [-44.5%; -22.6%] | |
| Blood | 0 (0%) | 3 (3%) | 3 (1.4%) | 0.10 | [-7.3%; 12.7%] |
| Others | 1 (0.9%) | 4 (4%) | 5 (2.3%) | 0.18 | [-8.3%; 2.0%] |
| Unknown | 18 (15.5%) | 32 (32%) | 50 (23.1%) | [-28.6%; -4.3%] | |
| W/information | 8 (6.9%) | 15 (15%) | 23 (10.6%) | 0.09 | [-17.4%; 1.2%] |
| <200 | 19 (16.4%) | 20 (20%) | 39 (18.1%) | 0.60 | [-14.9%; 7.6%] |
| 200 - 350 | 7 (6%) | 6 (6%) | 13 (6%) | 1 | [-6.4%; 6.4%] |
| 350 - 500 | 30 (25.9%) | 20 (20%) | 50 (23.1%) | 0.39 | [-6.3%; 18.0%] |
| >500 | 60 (51.7%) | 54 (54%) | 114 (52.8%) | 0.84 | [-16.6%; 12.0%] |
| 0 - 10.000 | 112 (96.6%) | 94 (94%) | 206 (95.4%) | 0.52 | [-4.1%; 9.2%] |
| 10.000 - 100.000 | 3 (2.6%) | 5 (5%) | 8 (3.7%) | 0.48 | [-8.5%; 3.7%] |
| >1000.000 | 1 (0.8%) | 1 (1%) | 2 (0.9%) | 1 | [-2.9%; 2.6%] |
The p-values (Fisher Exact test) indicated here indicate whether HSM / MSM populations are different in age, ethnicity, marital status, education, transmission, lymphocytes T CD4+ and viral load. There is no relation to the response variables (adherence and depression).
*in education item in this table, divided by educational cycles practiced in Brazil.
*MSM = Men who have sex with men
*MSW= Men who have sex with women
*S.C.W.S.S P.= Sexual contact with same sex partner
*S.C.W.O.S.P. = Sexual contact with opposite sex partner.
Absolute numbers and respective percent of depression by Beck depression inventory (BDI) and adherence data by START questionnaire.
| B.D.I. | MSM | MSW | All | * | CI 95% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 - 13 | 73/ (62.9%) | 73/ (73%) | 146/ (67.5%) | 0.15 | [-23.3%; 3.2%] |
| 14 - 19 | 22/ (18.9%) | 13/ (13%) | 35/ (16.2%) | 0.32 | [-4.7%; 16.6%] |
| 20 - 28 | 12/ (10.3%) | 5/ (5%) | 17/ (7.9%) | 0.23 | [-2.5%; 13.3%] |
| 29 - 63 | 9/ (7.7%) | 9/ (9%) | 18/ (8.4%) | 0.93 | [-9.5%; 7.1%] |
| All | 106/ (91.4%) | 90/ (90%) | 196/ (90.8%) | 0.91 | [-7.3%; 10.1%] |
| Majority | 7/ (6.0%) | 6/ (6.0%) | 13/ (6.0%) | 1 | [-6.4%; 6.4%] |
| Half | 2/ (1.7%) | 1/ (1.0%) | 3/ (1.4%) | 1 | [-3.1%; 4.5%] |
| Few | 0 | 2/ (2.0%) | 2/ (0.9%) | 0.21 | [-5.6%; 1.7%] |
| None | 1/ (0.9%) | 1/ (1.0%) | 2/ (0.9%) | 1 | [-2.8%; 2.6%] |
B.D.I.
0 - 13 - Minimum depression
14 - 19 - Mild depression
20 - 28 - Moderate depression
29 - 63 - Severe depression.
ADHERENCE
All - Ingestion of all prescribed doses
Majority - Ingestion of most prescribed doses
Half - half doses intake
Few - Ingestion of a few doses
None - Do not eat the doses indicated.
Demonstration of the Log-linear class for categorized data analysis regarding depression as a response variable related to the other variables.
| Variable | Depression level | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Mild | 0.96 | 0.97 | [0.32; 2.91] |
| Moderate | 0.34 | [0.12; 0.96] | ||
| Severe | 0.27 | 0.64 | [0.29; 1.40] | |
| Viral Load | Mild | 0.77 | 1.38 | [0.16; 12.13] |
| Moderate | 0.73 | 1.46 | [0.17; 12.88] | |
| Severe | 0.68 | 1.42 | [0.27; 7.36] | |
| Lymphocytes T CD4+ | Mild | 0.07 | 2.56 | [0.92; 7.09] |
| Moderate | 0.50 | 0.70 | [0.25; 1.97] | |
| Severe | 0.68 | 0.85 | [0.40; 1.79] | |
| Marital status | Mild | 0.46 | 0.69 | [0.26; 1.84] |
| Moderate | 0.98 | 1.01 | [0.35; 2.91] | |
| Severe | 0.88 | 1.06 | [0.48; 2.33] | |
| Education | Mild | 0.91 | 0.94 | [0.35; 2.51] |
| Moderate | 0.15 | 2.16 | [0.76; 6.10] | |
| Severe | 0.99 | 0.99 | [0.47; 2.09] | |
| Transmission | Mild | 0.72 | 0.84 | [0.31; 2.25] |
| Moderate | 0.60 | 0.76 | [0.27; 2.13] | |
| Severe | 0.51 | [0.24; 1.07] | ||
| Orientation | Mild | 1.00 | 1.00 | [0.38; 2.61] |
| Moderate | 0.11 | 0.42 | [0.14; 1.23] | |
| Severe | 0.17 | 0.59 | [0.28; 1.28] | |
| Ethinicity | Mild | 0.76 | 0.78 | [0.16; 3.74] |
| Moderate | 0.22 | 0.42 | [0.11; 1.67] | |
| Severe | 0.25 | 3.32 | [0.42; 26.00] | |
| Adherence | Mild | 0.53 | 0.60 | [0.12; 2.99] |
| Moderate | 0.26 | [0.07; 0.97] | ||
| Severe | 0.43 | 0.61 | [0.18; 2.09] |
Chances of individual develop depression in the studied group. Observed distribution of depression per transmission and adhrence.
| Depression | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission | Adherence | Minimum | Mild | Moderate | Severe | Total |
| Same Sex | Yes | 54 (64.3%) | 17 (20.2%) | 7 (8.3%) | 6 (7.1%) | 84 |
| No | 4 (40%) | 3 (30%) | 1 (10%) | 2 (20%) | 10 | |
| Oposite Sex/Others | Yes | 82 (73.2%) | 14 (12.5%) | 6 (5.4%) | 10 (8.9%) | 112 |
| No | 6 (60%) | 1 (10%) | 3 (30%) | 0 (0%) | 10 | |
Figure 1The diagnosis of the logistic regression model. Since all residues are within the confidence band of the expected distribution, the model is well adjusted.
Demonstration of the multivariate analysis regarding adherence as a response variable related to the other variables studied.
| Variable | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.33 | 1.85 | [0.61; 5.60] |
| Ethnicity | 0.0008 | 7.68 | [2.34; 25.21] |
| Marital status | 0.47 | 1.6 | [0.44; 5.78] |
| Education | 0.53 | 0.98 | [0.93; 1.04] |
| Transmission | 0.28 | 2.18 | [0.53; 8.94] |
| Sexual Orientation | 0.37 | 0.5 | [0.11; 2.26] |
| Lymphocytes T CD4+ | 0.5 | 1.45 | [0.53; 8.94] |
| Viral load HIV | 0.26 | 0.35 | [0.06; 2.17] |
| Depression | 0.0134 | 3.81 | [1.32; 11.02] |
For the regression model for a variable adherence, the above results for all variables tested. Among them, only ethnicity and depression are statistically significant (p<0.05). The results can be interpreted through odds ratios and their respective confidence intervals.
The interpretation of the odds ratios indicates that, from the statistical model, it is considered that black men have a 7.7 times greater chance of not being adherent in relation to men of the other ethnicities. Men who have any level of depression have a 3.8 times greater chance of not being adherent compared to those without depression.
Observed distribution of adherence per ethnicity and depression.
| Variable | Adherence | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethinicity | Depression | Adherence | non adherence | Total |
| White/Mixed | w/o depression | 125 (94%) | 8 (6%) | 133 |
| w depression | 58 (90.6%) | 6 (9.4%) | 64 | |
| Black | w/o depression | 11 (84.6%) | 2 (15.4%) | 13 |
| w depression | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (66.7%) | 6 | |