Nicholas P Deputy1,2, Andrea J Sharma2,3, Shin Y Kim2, Christine K Olson2,3. 1. 1 Nutrition and Health Sciences Program, Laney Graduate School, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia . 2. 2 Maternal and Infant Health Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , Atlanta, Georgia . 3. 3 U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps , Atlanta, Georgia .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) revised gestational weight gain recommendations in 2009. We examined associations between healthcare provider advice about gestational weight gain and inadequate or excessive weight gain, stratified by prepregnancy body mass index category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from women delivering full-term (37-42 weeks of gestation), singleton infants from four states that participated in the 2010-2011 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (unweighted n = 7125). Women reported the weight gain range (start and end values) advised by their healthcare provider; advice was categorized as follows: starting below recommendations, starting and ending within recommendations (IOM consistent), ending above recommendations, not remembered, or not received. We examined associations between healthcare provider advice and inadequate or excessive, compared with appropriate, gestational weight gain using adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Overall, 26.3% of women reported receiving IOM-consistent healthcare provider advice; 26.0% received no advice. Compared with IOM-consistent advice, advice below recommendations was associated with higher likelihood of inadequate weight gain among underweight (aPR 2.22, CI 1.29-3.82) and normal weight women (aPR 1.57, CI 1.23-2.02); advice above recommendations was associated with higher likelihood of excessive weight gain among all but underweight women (aPR range 1.36, CI 1.08-1.72 to aPR 1.42, CI 1.19-1.71). Not remembering or not receiving advice was associated with both inadequate and excessive weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Few women reported receiving IOM-consistent advice; not receiving IOM-consistent advice put women at-risk for weight gain outside recommendations. Strategies that raise awareness of IOM recommendations and address barriers to providing advice are needed.
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine (IOM) revised gestational weight gain recommendations in 2009. We examined associations between healthcare provider advice about gestational weight gain and inadequate or excessive weight gain, stratified by prepregnancy body mass index category. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from women delivering full-term (37-42 weeks of gestation), singleton infants from four states that participated in the 2010-2011 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (unweighted n = 7125). Women reported the weight gain range (start and end values) advised by their healthcare provider; advice was categorized as follows: starting below recommendations, starting and ending within recommendations (IOM consistent), ending above recommendations, not remembered, or not received. We examined associations between healthcare provider advice and inadequate or excessive, compared with appropriate, gestational weight gain using adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Overall, 26.3% of women reported receiving IOM-consistent healthcare provider advice; 26.0% received no advice. Compared with IOM-consistent advice, advice below recommendations was associated with higher likelihood of inadequate weight gain among underweight (aPR 2.22, CI 1.29-3.82) and normal weight women (aPR 1.57, CI 1.23-2.02); advice above recommendations was associated with higher likelihood of excessive weight gain among all but underweight women (aPR range 1.36, CI 1.08-1.72 to aPR 1.42, CI 1.19-1.71). Not remembering or not receiving advice was associated with both inadequate and excessive weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Few women reported receiving IOM-consistent advice; not receiving IOM-consistent advice put women at-risk for weight gain outside recommendations. Strategies that raise awareness of IOM recommendations and address barriers to providing advice are needed.
Authors: Suzanne Phelan; Maureen G Phipps; Barbara Abrams; Francine Darroch; Andrew Schaffner; Rena R Wing Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Tiffany A Moore Simas; Molly E Waring; Gina M T Sullivan; Xun Liao; Milagros C Rosal; Janet R Hardy; Robert E Berry Journal: Birth Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.689
Authors: Andrea L Deierlein; Mary Jo Messito; Michelle Katzow; Lauren Thomas Berube; Cara D Dolin; Rachel S Gross Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Laura Lorenz; Franziska Krebs; Farah Nawabi; Adrienne Alayli; Stephanie Stock Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Nicole E Marshall; Barbara Abrams; Linda A Barbour; Patrick Catalano; Parul Christian; Jacob E Friedman; William W Hay; Teri L Hernandez; Nancy F Krebs; Emily Oken; Jonathan Q Purnell; James M Roberts; Hora Soltani; Jacqueline Wallace; Kent L Thornburg Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-12-27 Impact factor: 10.693
Authors: Kara M Whitaker; Meghan Baruth; Rebecca A Schlaff; Christopher P Connolly; Jihong Liu; Sara Wilcox Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Barbara Abrams; Hyagriv N Simhan; Christina M Scifres; Robert M Silver; Samuel Parry; Brian A Crosland; Judith Chung; Katherine P Himes Journal: Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 3.980
Authors: Amanda M Perak; Hongyan Ning; Sadiya S Khan; Linda V Van Horn; William A Grobman; Donald M Lloyd-Jones Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 5.501