| Literature DB >> 29318612 |
Susan Ross1, Melissa Cheung1, Ching-In Lau1, Neil Sebire2, Michael Burch2, Peter Kilbride3, Barry Fuller4, G John Morris3, E Graham Davies1,2, Tessa Crompton1.
Abstract
Nude mouse human thymus transplant model: Fresh or cryopreserved and thawed human thymus slices were transplanted subcutaneously into recipient nude mice. Nude mice subsequently produced mouse CD3+ CD4+ T-cells.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical immunology; Cryopreservation; Thymopoiesis; Thymus transplantation; Transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29318612 PMCID: PMC5947170 DOI: 10.1002/eji.201747193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Immunol ISSN: 0014-2980 Impact factor: 5.532
Figure 1Human thymus slices that have been cryopreserved can induce and support T‐cell development in nude mice. (A) Histology of fresh human thymus and human thymus slices that have been frozen, thawed, and cultured for 24 h (hematoxylin and eosin staining, ×40 magnification). (B) Pan‐cytokeratin staining on slices as in (A). Scale bar: 0.1 mm data are representative of nine independent experiments (different thymuses) with each thymus examined in three sections. (C and D) T‐cell populations in lymph node from nude mice at 12 weeks after transplantation with cryopreserved human thymus (Nu‐C‐Tp), compared to wildtype (WT) and to untransplanted nude (Nude). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as described 13, gating on cells that stained negative for anti‐mouse CD11c‐PE, anti‐mouse CD11b‐PE, anti‐mouse CD45R‐PE, anti‐mouse γδ T‐cell receptor‐PE and anti‐mouse NK1.1‐PE (C) Contour plots show anti‐mouse CD4‐PerCPCy5.5 and anti‐mouse CD8‐APC staining on lymph node cells from WT control (left‐hand plot), nude transplanted with cryopreserved human thymus slices (Nu‐C‐Tp, middle plot) and control non‐transplanted nude (Nude, right‐hand plot). The percentage of CD8 T‐cells and CD4 T‐cells is given for each region shown. (D) The scatter plot shows the percentage of CD3+‐FITC CD4+‐PerCPCy5.5 T‐cells from the lymph nodes of independent transplanted nude mice (Nu‐C‐Tp, n = 4) and control (non‐transplanted) nude mice (Nude, n = 4). Detailed gating strategy is reported in the Supporting information. Each data point represents an individual mouse transplanted with slices from a different human thymus. The difference in mean between the two groups of mice was significant by Student's t‐test (p = 0.005, **p≤0.01). Data are representative of four independent experiments.
Figure 2Mouse T‐cells are CD3 positive in nude mice transplanted with cryopreserved human thymus and human T‐cells were not detected. (A) T‐cell populations in lymph node from nude mice at 12 weeks after transplantation with cryopreserved human thymus (Nu‐C‐Tp), compared to wild‐type (WT). Cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, gating on cells that stained negative for anti‐mouse CD11c‐PE, anti‐mouse CD11b‐PE, anti‐mouse CD45R‐PE, anti‐mouse γδ T‐cell receptor‐PE and anti‐mouse NK1.1‐PE. Contour plots show, for left‐hand column, anti‐mouse CD4‐PerCPCy5.5 versus anti‐mouse CD3‐FITC staining, gated on CD4‐PerCPCy5.5 positive, and for right‐hand column, anti‐mouse CD8‐APC versus anti‐mouse CD3‐FITC staining, gated on CD8‐positive, for control WT (upper panel) and nude transplanted with cryopreserved human thymus slices (Nu‐C‐Tp, lower panel). The percentage of cells in each quadrant is given. (B) T‐cell populations in lymph node from nude mice at 12 weeks after transplantation with cryopreserved human thymus (Nu‐C‐Tp) or human thymus that has not been cryopreserved (Nu‐F‐Tp), compared to nude control. Bar graphs show mean number of T‐cells ± SEM per 100 000 cells recovered from lymph nodes, n = 3 with exception of transplanted cryopreserved thymus (Nu‐C‐Tp) CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ n = 4 and transplanted fresh thymus (Nu‐F‐Tp) CD4+CD25− and CD4+CD25+ n = 2. Statistical significance using the Student's t‐test was assessed between the nude mice transplanted with cryopreserved thymus and control non‐transplanted nude mice, CD3+CD4+ p = 0.005. **p≤0.01, CD4+CD25− p = 0.018, *p≤0.05 and CD4+CD25+ p = 0.0002 ***p≤0.001. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) T‐cell populations in lymph node from nude mice 12 weeks after transplantation with cryopreserved human thymus (Nu‐C‐Tp), compared to WT. Contour plots show staining against human‐CD8‐APC and human‐CD4‐FITC on lymph node cells from WT (left‐hand plot) and nude transplanted with cryopreserved human thymus slices (Nu‐C‐Tp, right‐hand plot). Data are representative of four independent experiments with three mice per condition. The percentage of cells in each quadrant is given.