Ula Hwang1,2,3, Scott M Dresden4, Mark S Rosenberg5, Melissa M Garrido2,3, George Loo1, Jeremy Sze1, Stephanie Gravenor4, D Mark Courtney4, Raymond Kang6, Carolyn W Zhu2,3, Carmen Vargas-Torres1, Corita R Grudzen7, Lynne D Richardson1,8. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 2. Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 3. Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, New York. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Josephs Healthcare System/New York Medical College, Paterson, New Jersey. 6. Center for Healthcare Studies, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois. 7. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Population Health, New York University, New York, New York. 8. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an emergency department (ED)-based transitional care nurse (TCN) on hospital use. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Three U.S. (NY, IL, NJ) EDs from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older in the ED (N = 57,287). INTERVENTION: The intervention was first TCN contact. Controls never saw a TCN during the study period. MEASUREMENTS: We examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with TCN use and outcomes. The primary outcome was inpatient admission during the index ED visit (admission on Day 0). Secondary outcomes included cumulative 30-day admission (any admission on Days 0-30) and 72-hour ED revisits. RESULTS: A TCN saw 5,930 (10%) individuals, 42% of whom were admitted. After accounting for observed selection bias using entropy balance, results showed that when compared to controls, TCN contact was associated with lower risk of admission (site 1: -9.9% risk of inpatient admission, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -12.3% to -7.5%; site 2: -16.5%, 95% CI = -18.7% to -14.2%; site 3: -4.7%, 95% CI = -7.5% to -2.0%). Participants with TCN contact had greater risk of a 72-hour ED revisit at two sites (site 1: 1.5%, 95% CI = 0.7-2.3%; site 2: 1.4%, 95% CI = 0.7-2.1%). Risk of any admission within 30 days of the index ED visit also remained lower for TCN patients at both these sites (site 1: -7.8%, 95% CI = -10.3% to -5.3%; site 2: -13.8%, 95% CI = -16.1% to -11.6%). CONCLUSION: Targeted evaluation by geriatric ED transitions of care staff may be an effective delivery innovation to reduce risk of inpatient admission.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of an emergency department (ED)-based transitional care nurse (TCN) on hospital use. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Three U.S. (NY, IL, NJ) EDs from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older in the ED (N = 57,287). INTERVENTION: The intervention was first TCN contact. Controls never saw a TCN during the study period. MEASUREMENTS: We examined sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with TCN use and outcomes. The primary outcome was inpatient admission during the index ED visit (admission on Day 0). Secondary outcomes included cumulative 30-day admission (any admission on Days 0-30) and 72-hour ED revisits. RESULTS: A TCN saw 5,930 (10%) individuals, 42% of whom were admitted. After accounting for observed selection bias using entropy balance, results showed that when compared to controls, TCN contact was associated with lower risk of admission (site 1: -9.9% risk of inpatient admission, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -12.3% to -7.5%; site 2: -16.5%, 95% CI = -18.7% to -14.2%; site 3: -4.7%, 95% CI = -7.5% to -2.0%). Participants with TCN contact had greater risk of a 72-hour ED revisit at two sites (site 1: 1.5%, 95% CI = 0.7-2.3%; site 2: 1.4%, 95% CI = 0.7-2.1%). Risk of any admission within 30 days of the index ED visit also remained lower for TCNpatients at both these sites (site 1: -7.8%, 95% CI = -10.3% to -5.3%; site 2: -13.8%, 95% CI = -16.1% to -11.6%). CONCLUSION: Targeted evaluation by geriatric ED transitions of care staff may be an effective delivery innovation to reduce risk of inpatient admission.
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Katherine M Hunold; Christopher R Carpenter; Jeffrey M Caterino; Lorraine C Mion Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Manish N Shah; Matthew M Hollander; Courtney Mc Jones; Thomas V Caprio; Yeates Conwell; Jeremy T Cushman; Eva H DuGoff; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Eric A Coleman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Alexander X Lo; Kevin Biese; Glenn Arendts; Jay Banerjee; Ula Hwang; Scott Dresden; Vivian Argento; Maura Kennedy; Christina L Shenvi; Christopher R Carpenter Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Jaime M Hughes; Caroline E Freiermuth; Megan Shepherd-Banigan; Luna Ragsdale; Stephanie A Eucker; Karen Goldstein; S Nicole Hastings; Rachel L Rodriguez; Jessica Fulton; Katherine Ramos; Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Adelaide M Gordon; Jennifer M Gierisch; Andrzej Kosinski; John W Williams Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-03-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lauren T Southerland; Elizabeth L Savage; Katrina Muska Duff; Jeffrey M Caterino; Tina R Bergados; Katherine M Hunold; Geoffrey I Finnegan; Gregory Archual Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jessica R Schumacher; Barbara J Lutz; Allyson G Hall; Jeffrey S Harman; Kristen Turner; Babette A Brumback; Phyllis Hendry; Donna L Carden Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Gwen C Jacobsohn; Courtney M C Jones; Rebecca K Green; Amy L Cochran; Thomas V Caprio; Jeremy T Cushman; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Manish N Shah Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2021-08-20 Impact factor: 3.451