| Literature DB >> 29318009 |
Ceyda Anar1, Melike Yüksel Yavuz1, Filiz Güldaval1, Yelda Varol1, Dilek Kalenci2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the availability of FRAX for assessing osteoporosis risk, and to demonstrate the importance of vitamin D levels in COPD patients.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29318009 PMCID: PMC5756431 DOI: 10.1186/s40248-017-0116-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med ISSN: 1828-695X
Characteristics of COPD group
| Feature | Mean ± SD | Median (min–max) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 62.4 ± 8.3 | 65 (41–76) |
| Smoking (PY) | 43.8 ± 15.7 | 40 (20–100) |
| COPD time from diagnosis | 7.6 ± 5.8 | 5 (2–25) |
| FEV1(mL) | 1435 ± 597 | 1285 (400–2720) |
| FVC (mL) | 2516 ± 777 | 2360 (840–4000) |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 55.8 ± 9.1 | 57 (33–70) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.6 ± 4.8 | 24 (14–38.6) |
| MRC | 1.2 ± 0.6 | 2.2 (0–3) |
| CAD | 11.5 ± 4.5 | 11 (4–26) |
| Exacerbation number | 0.65 ± 0.9 | 0 (0–4) |
| Hospitalization number | 0.24 ± 0.4 | 0 (0–2) |
| Vitamin D | 12 ± 6.6 | 10.9 (4.2–34.9) |
| FRAX score (major osteoporotic) | 6.09 ± 4.2 | 4.7 (2.1–26) |
| FRAX score (hip fracture) | 2.5 ± 3.3 | 1.6 (0.3–19) |
| Lumber T Score | −1.4 ± 1.5 | −1.6 (−4.3–2.7) |
| Neck T Score | −1.6 ± 0.9 | −1.7 (−4–0.6) |
Fig. 1Comparison of 25(OH)D vitamin levels between patient group and control group
Characteristics of patients as per the COPD grades and Vitamin D levels
| Feature | COPD grade |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| A–B | C–D | ||
| Age | 65 (41–76) | 65 (52–79) | 0.320 |
| Smoking (PY) | 40 (20–80) | 50 (20–100) | 0.250 |
| COPD time from diagnosis | 4 (2–29) | 5 (2–20) | 0.178 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 64 (48–70) | 51 (33–64) | 0.000 |
| FEV1 (mL) | 66 (44–80) | 35 (14–67) | 0.000 |
| FVC (mL) | 86 (61–100) | 54 (23–86) | 0.000 |
| BMI | 25 (14–32) | 23 (19–38.6) | 0.956 |
| MRC | 1 (0–2) | 2,2 (0–3) | 0.011 |
| CAT | 9 (4–19) | 12 (6–26) | 0.012 |
| Vitamin D | 14.7 (7–34.9) | 8.6 (4.2–16.9) | 0.000 |
| FRAX score (major osteoporotic %) | 4.4 (2.3–15) | 4.7 (2.1–26) | 0.956 |
| FRAX score (hip fracture %) | 1.4 (0.3–11) | 1.6 (0.3–19) | 0.740 |
Fig. 2Relation between the exacerbation in the last year and vitamin D level
Fig. 3Relation between the hospitalization in the last year and vitamin D level
Relation between Vitamin D level and FRAX score, MRC, and CAT situation
| Vitamin D | ||
|---|---|---|
| FEV1/FVC (%) |
| 0.436 |
|
| 0.003 | |
| FEV 1 (ml) |
| 0.564 |
|
| 0.000 | |
| FVC (ml) |
| 0.514 |
|
| 0.000 | |
| MRC |
| −0.464 |
|
| 0.002 | |
| CAT |
| −0.350 |
|
| 0.022 | |
| FRAX score (major osteoporotic %) |
| −0.090 |
|
| 0.565 | |
| FRAX score (hip fracture %) |
| −0.170 |
|
| 0.276 | |
| Lumbar spine T score |
| 0.366 |
|
| 0.016 | |
| Neck T score |
| 0.422 |
|
| 0.005 | |
Fig. 4Relation between osteoporosis and FRAX score (major osteoporotic %)
Fig. 5Relation between osteoporosis and FRAX score (hip fracture %)
Fig. 6Relation between osteoporosis and vitamin D level