Henry A Curtis1, Karen Trang1, Kevin W Chason2, Paul D Biddinger3. 1. 1Stanford University School of Medicine,Stanford,CaliforniaUSA. 2. 2Mount Sinai School of Medicine,New York,New YorkUSA. 3. 3Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston,MassachusettsUSA.
Abstract
Introduction Great demands have been placed on disaster medicine educators. There is a need to develop innovative methods to educate Emergency Physicians in the ever-expanding body of disaster medicine knowledge. The authors sought to demonstrate that video-based learning (VBL) could be a promising alternative to traditional learning methods for teaching disaster medicine core competencies. Hypothesis/Problem The objective was to compare VBL to traditional lecture (TL) for instructing Emergency Medicine residents in the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP; Irving, Texas USA) disaster medicine core competencies of patient triage and decontamination. METHODS: A randomized, controlled pilot study compared two methods of instruction for mass triage, decontamination, and personal protective equipment (PPE). Emergency Medicine resident learning was measured with a knowledge quiz, a Likert scale measuring comfort, and a practical exercise. An independent samples t-test compared the scoring of the VBL with the TL group. RESULTS:Twenty-six residents were randomized to VBL (n=13) or TL (n=13). Knowledge score improvement following video (14.9%) versus lecture (14.1%) did not differ significantly between the groups (P=.74). Comfort score improvement also did not differ (P=.64) between video (18.3%) and lecture groups (15.8%). In the practical skills assessment, the VBL group outperformed the TL group overall (70.4% vs 55.5%; P<.0001), with significantly better performance in donning PPE and decontamination. Although not part of the original study design, a three-month post-hoc analysis was performed. When comparing the pre-intervention and three-month post-hoc performances, there were no significant differences in knowledge increases between VBL versus TL (P=.41) or in comfort (P=.39). CONCLUSION: Video modules can be as effective as TL when utilized to train Emergency Medicine residents in the ACEP disaster medicine core competencies of patient triage and decontamination. Curtis HA , Trang K , Chason KW , Biddinger PD . Video-based learning vs traditional lecture for instructing emergency medicine residents in disaster medicine principles of mass triage, decontamination, and personal protective equipment. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):7-12.
RCT Entities:
Introduction Great demands have been placed on disaster medicine educators. There is a need to develop innovative methods to educate Emergency Physicians in the ever-expanding body of disaster medicine knowledge. The authors sought to demonstrate that video-based learning (VBL) could be a promising alternative to traditional learning methods for teaching disaster medicine core competencies. Hypothesis/Problem The objective was to compare VBL to traditional lecture (TL) for instructing Emergency Medicine residents in the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP; Irving, Texas USA) disaster medicine core competencies of patient triage and decontamination. METHODS: A randomized, controlled pilot study compared two methods of instruction for mass triage, decontamination, and personal protective equipment (PPE). Emergency Medicine resident learning was measured with a knowledge quiz, a Likert scale measuring comfort, and a practical exercise. An independent samples t-test compared the scoring of the VBL with the TL group. RESULTS: Twenty-six residents were randomized to VBL (n=13) or TL (n=13). Knowledge score improvement following video (14.9%) versus lecture (14.1%) did not differ significantly between the groups (P=.74). Comfort score improvement also did not differ (P=.64) between video (18.3%) and lecture groups (15.8%). In the practical skills assessment, the VBL group outperformed the TL group overall (70.4% vs 55.5%; P<.0001), with significantly better performance in donning PPE and decontamination. Although not part of the original study design, a three-month post-hoc analysis was performed. When comparing the pre-intervention and three-month post-hoc performances, there were no significant differences in knowledge increases between VBL versus TL (P=.41) or in comfort (P=.39). CONCLUSION: Video modules can be as effective as TL when utilized to train Emergency Medicine residents in the ACEP disaster medicine core competencies of patient triage and decontamination. Curtis HA , Trang K , Chason KW , Biddinger PD . Video-based learning vs traditional lecture for instructing emergency medicine residents in disaster medicine principles of mass triage, decontamination, and personal protective equipment. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):7-12.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACEP American College of Emergency Physicians; CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CPR cardiopulmonary resuscitation; PGY post-graduate year; PPE personal protective equipment; TL traditional lecture; VBL video-based learning; decontamination; disaster medicine; emergency medicine residents; mass triage; personal protective equipment; traditional lecture; video-based learning
Authors: Nitin Seam; Jeremy B Richards; Patricia A Kritek; Danai Khemasuwan; Jennifer W McCallister; Lekshmi Santhosh; Bharati Prasad; Sumit Bhargava; Alison S Clay; Laura E Crotty Alexander Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2019-10
Authors: Rachel Umoren; Sherri Bucher; Chinyere Veronica Ezeaka; Fabian Esamai; Daniel S Hippe; Beatrice Nkolika Ezenwa; Iretiola Bamikeolu Fajolu; Felicitas M Okwako; John Feltner; Mary Nafula; Annet Musale; Olubukola A Olawuyi; Christianah O Adeboboye; Ime Asangansi; Chris Paton; Saptarshi Purkayastha Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jos H Verbeek; Blair Rajamaki; Sharea Ijaz; Christina Tikka; Jani H Ruotsalainen; Michael B Edmond; Riitta Sauni; F Selcen Kilinc Balci Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Peter Kiiza; Sarah I Mullin; Koren Teo; Len Goodman; Adic Perez; Ruxandra Pinto; Kelly Thompson; Dominique Piquette; Trevor Hall; Elhadj I Bah; Michael Christian; Jan J Hajek; Raymond Kao; François Lamontagne; John C Marshall; Sharmistha Mishra; Srinivas Murthy; Abel Vanderschuren; Robert A Fowler; Neill K J Adhikari Journal: Viruses Date: 2021-11-02 Impact factor: 5.048
Authors: Jos H Verbeek; Blair Rajamaki; Sharea Ijaz; Riitta Sauni; Elaine Toomey; Bronagh Blackwood; Christina Tikka; Jani H Ruotsalainen; F Selcen Kilinc Balci Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-04-15