| Literature DB >> 29316983 |
Anna E Phillips1, Pedro H Gazzinelli-Guimarães2, Herminio O Aurelio2,3, Neerav Dhanani2, Josefo Ferro3, Rassul Nala4, Arminder Deol2, Alan Fenwick2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The results presented here are part of a five-year cluster-randomised intervention trial that was implemented to understand how best to gain and sustain control of schistosomiasis through different preventive chemotherapy strategies. This paper presents baseline data that were collected in ten districts of Cabo Delgado province, northern Mozambique, before treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Community-wide treatment; Mozambique; Schistosoma haematobium; Schistosomiasis; School-based treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29316983 PMCID: PMC5761122 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2592-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Prevalence of S. haematobium across all villages included in the SCORE study at baseline, in the ten districts of Cabo Delgado, Mozambique
Prevalence and intensity of S. haematobium in first-year students (aged 5–8 years), 9–12-year-olds, 13–14-year-olds, and adults (aged 20–55 years) at baseline of a SCORE study in northern Mozambique
| Age group (years) | No. of individuals examined | No. of individuals infected (%)a | Intensity of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic mean intensity (eggs/10 ml)b | No. of heavily infected individuals (%) | |||
| Both sexes | ||||
| 5–8 | 7463 | 4709 (63.1) | 58.2 | 1440 (33.8) |
| 9–12 | 7317 | 4873 (66.6) | 71.9 | 1633 (33.9) |
| 13–14c | 5429 | 4010 (73.9) | ||
| 20–55 | 4259 | 1910 (44.8) | 23.9 | 300 (15.8) |
| Totald | 19,039 | 11,492 (60.4) | 55.8 | 3373 (17.7) |
| Females | ||||
| 5–8 | 3196 | 1922 (60.1) | 44.7 | 517 (27.1) |
| 9–12 | 3013 | 1890 (62.7) | 54.4 | 547 (29.0) |
| 13–14c | 2276 | 1666 (73.2) | ||
| 20–55 | 1329 | 560 (42.1) | 22.0 | 88 (15.9) |
| Totald | 7538 | 4372 (58.0) | 44.6 | 1152 (23.8) |
| Males | ||||
| 5–8 | 4261 | 2784 (65.3) | 68.1 | 923 (33.2) |
| 9–12 | 4239 | 2946 (69.5) | 84.9 | 1086 (37.1) |
| 13–14c | 3153 | 2344 (74.3) | ||
| 20–55 | 2924 | 1349 (46.1) | 24.8 | 212 (15.8) |
| Totald | 11,424 | 7079 (62.0) | 63.12 | 2221 (26.7) |
aFor sexes combined, there was a significant difference in prevalence between age groups (P < 0.001) with the following sequence: 9–12 > 5–8 > 20–55 years (χ2 test). Within every age group, males had higher prevalence of infection than females in 5–8, 9–12 and 20–55 years (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, respectively)
bFor sexes combined, there was no difference between the two groups of children (age group 5–8 and 9–12 years), but intensity of infection among children was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than adults (one-way ANOVA). There was no difference between genders among school children, but male adults had higher intensities than females (P < 0.02)
cEligibility results: prevalence of haematuria by dipstick from a single urine sample from children aged 13–14 years
dTotal only includes the microscopic urine filtration data from the cross-sectional analysis, and excludes eligibility data that was collected in 13–14 year-olds using reagent strips only
Fig. 2Prevalence of S. haematobium infection (dark blue) and heavy infection (red) by age group
Prevalence and intensity of S. haematobium by occupation adults aged 20–55 years
| Main occupation | No. of individuals examined | No. of individuals infected (%) | Intensity of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic mean intensity of infectiona | Heavy infection (%) | |||
| Farmer | 3971 | 1805 (45.5) | 46.7 | 276 (15.3) |
| Teacher | 73 | 31 (43.7) | 49.9 | 5 (16.1) |
| Student | 45 | 21 (46.7) | 103.4 | 12 (57.1) |
| Other | 66 | 21 (31.8) | 103.4 | 3 (14.3) |
| Total | 4154 | 1877 | 49.8 | 297 (15.8) |
aThere was no statistical difference between prevalence or intensity of infection by occupation in the univariate logistic regression, controlling for sex and age
Frequency of potential demographic, health-system related, and environmental risk factors associated with urogenital schistosomiasis reported by 144 communities in Cabo Delgado, northern Mozambique
| Variable | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Main occupation of inhabitants in the village | ||
| Agriculture | 113 | 75.3 |
| Rice farming | 23 | 15.3 |
| Irrigation-based farming | 7 | 4.7 |
| Fishing | 5 | 3.3 |
| Local health facility | ||
| Health facility open regularly | 62 | 41.3 |
| Does the health facility dispense PZQ | 1 | 0.7 |
| Water contact sites | ||
| No. of villages with seasonal rivers | 85 | 56.7 |
| No. of villages with permanent rivers | 76 | 51.0 |
| No. of villages with permanent standing water body | 31 | 20.7 |
| No. of villages with seasonal standing water body | 17 | 11.3 |
| Water sources for drinking | ||
| Well or borehole | 133 | 88.7 |
| Open surface water | 125 | 83.3 |
| Tap water | 8 | 5.3 |
| Water sources for washing/bathing | ||
| Open surface water | 137 | 91.3 |
| Well or borehole | 131 | 87.3 |
| Tap water | 9 | 6.0 |
| Sanitation facilities | ||
| Pit latrine | 147 | 98.0 |
| Bush/field | 125 | 83.3 |
| Improved latrine | 10 | 6.0 |
| Toilet | 10 | 6.0 |
| Heard about schistosomiasis | 155 | 68.6 |
| How do you catch schistosomiasis?a | ||
| Do not know | 79 | 50.1 |
| Bathing in open water sources | 36 | 23.2 |
| Sexual | 19 | 12.3 |
| Drinking water | 18 | 11.6 |
| Symptoms of schistosomiasisa | ||
| Pain on urination | 114 | 76.5 |
| Do not know | 17 | 11.4 |
| Increase need to urinate | 13 | 8.7 |
| Abdominal pain | 5 | 3.4 |
| How do you prevent schistosomiasis? | ||
| Treatment | 108 | 69.7 |
| Do not know | 31 | 20.0 |
| Education | 31 | 20.0 |
| Other | 12 | 7.7 |
| What is the name of the treatment for schistosomiasis? | ||
| Do not know | 151 | 97.4 |
| Praziquantel | 4 | 2.6 |
aKnowledge among a total of 155 participants who had heard of urogenital schistosomiasis