| Literature DB >> 29316900 |
Selvam Kannathasan1, Arumugam Murugananthan2, Thirunavukarasu Kumanan3, Nilanthi Renuka de Silva4, Nadarajah Rajeshkannan5, Rashidul Haque6, Devika Iddawela7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinically diagnosed amoebic liver abscess (ALA) caused by Entamoeba histolytica has been an important public health problem in Jaffna district, northern Sri Lanka for last three decades. In order to draw up a control strategy for elimination of this condition, knowledge of its epidemiology and factors associated with this condition in the local context is vital.Entities:
Keywords: Amoebiasis; Amoebic liver abscess; Entamoeba histolytica; Sri Lanka
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29316900 PMCID: PMC5761098 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5036-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Number of clinically diagnosed ALA patients per 10,000 admissions at Teaching Hospital, Jaffna
Socio demographic characteristics of ALA patients admitted to the Teaching Hospital, Jaffna compared with 100 individuals who were E. histolytica serum antibody negative
| Variable | Categories | Patients (Cases) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % with CI | % with CI | ||||
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 341 | 98.6(96.8–99.5) | 100 | 100 | |
| Female | 05 | 1.4(0.5–3.2) | 0 | 0 | |
| Age | |||||
| 20–30 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 18(11.4–26.4) | |
| 31–40 | 110 | 31.8(27.0–36.1) | 29 | 29(20.7–38.5) | |
| 41–50 | 216 | 62.4(57.2–67.4) | 23 | 23(15.5–32.0) | |
| 51–60 | 20 | 5.8(3.7–8.6) | 30 | 30(21.6–39.5) | |
| Educational level | |||||
| No school education | 8 | 2.3(1.1–4.3) | 2 | 2(0.03–6.5) | |
| Up to Grade 8 | 79 | 22.8(18.6–27.5) | 24 | 24(16.4–33.1) | |
| Grade 6 to G.C.E O/L | 258 | 77.6(69.8–78.9) | 74 | 74(64.7–81.9) | |
| Followed G.C.E O/L | 1 | 0.3(0.000–1.4) | 0 | 0 | |
| Occupation | |||||
| No Job | 72 | 20.8(16.8–25.3) | 5 | 5(1.9–10.7) | |
| Labourer | 223 | 64.5(59.3–69.3) | 66 | 66(56.3–74.8) | |
| Farmer | 33 | 9.5(6.8–13.0) | 19 | 19(12.2–27.6) | |
| Fishermen | 17 | 4.9(3.0–7.6) | 10 | 10(5.2–17.1) | |
| Self employed | 1 | 0.3(0.000–1.4) | 0 | 0 | |
| Monthly income | |||||
| < LKR5000 (USD 32.76) | 19 | 5.5(3.4–8.3) | 3 | 3(0.8–7.9) | |
| LKR5000–10000 (USD 32.76–65.49) | 298 | 86.1(82.2–89.5) | 87 | 87(79.3–92.6) | |
| LKR10001-LKR 25000 (USD 65.49–163.72) | 29 | 8.4(5.8–11.7) | 10 | 10(5.2–17.1) | |
Personal hygienic practice toward ALA among patients compared with E. histolytica antibody negative (disease free) individuals
| Variable | Categories | Patients (Cases) | Statistics | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % with CI | % with CI | |||||
| Latrine facilities | No facility/open air defecation | 3 | 0.9 | 0 | 0 | Pearson’s chi-square |
| Using pits | 21 | 6.1 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Water seal latrine | 322 | 93.1 | 97 | 97 | ||
| Distance between latrine and drinking water source | roughly 50 ft | 306 | 88.4 | 86 | 86 | Pearson’s chi-square with Yates’s correction = 0.235 |
| > 50 ft | 40 | 11.6 | 14 | 14 | ||
| Drinking habit | Fresh water | 346 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Eating habit | Rarely eat outside the house (cafeteria) | 78 | 22.5 | 33 | 33 | Pearson’s chi-square |
| Sometimes eat in cafeteria | 268 | 77.5 | 67 | 67 | ||
| Hand washing before eat | sometimes wash with soap and water before eating | 199 | 57.5 | 58 | 58 | Pearson’s chi-square |
| Rarely/Not washing hand with soap and water before eating | 147 | 42.5 | 42 | 42 | ||
| Hand washing after defecation | sometimes wash with soap and water | 340 | 98.3 | 98 | 98 | Pearson’s chi-square |
| rarely/Not washing with soap water | 6 | 1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Nails cutting habit | Regularly cutting nails | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 | T-test (trend test based on contrasts) [Barlow et al.]: |
| sometimes cutting nails | 238 | 68.8 | 68 | 68 | ||
| cutting nails after a long time | 107 | 30.9 | 32 | 34 | ||
Fig. 2Comparison of number of cases admitted to the Teaching Hospital, Jaffna, with average monthly climatic data during the study period
Fig. 3Monthly mean value of total toddy sold in the district
Detail description of alcohol consumption habit among ALA patient compared with individual who are E. histolytica antibody negative individuals
| Factors | Category | Patients (Cases) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % with CI | % with CI | ||||
| Alcohol drinking habit | yes | 346 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Type of alcohol | Only Toddy | 72 | 20.8 | 94 | 94 |
| Toddy + arrack | 274 | 79.2 | 6 | ||
| Type of toddy | Palmyrah | 346 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Frequency of drinking | Daily | 245 | 70.8 | 2 | 6 |
| 4–6 times a week | 101 | 29.2 | 20 | 20 | |
| 2–3 times a week | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 | |
| 2–4 times a month | 0 | 0 | 68 | 68 | |
Comparison of significantly differing factors between ALA patients and E. histolytica antibody negative individuals
| Factors | Category | Statistics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |||
| Age group | 21-30 yrs | 0 | 18 | Chi- Square-56.63; Df-3; |
| 31–40 yrs | 29 | 29 | ||
| 41-50 yrs | 66 | 23 | ||
| 51-60 yrs | 5 | 30 | ||
| Type of alcohol | Only toddy | 27 | 94 | Chi- square- 99.92; Df-1; P < 0.001,OR-4.5, 95%CI: 1.94–11.96 |
| Toddy + Arrack | 73 | 6 | ||
| Frequency of drinking | Daily | 70 | 2 | Chi Squre-1.481Ea Df-3 |
| 4–6 times a week | 30 | 20 | ||
| 2–3 times a week | 0 | 10 | ||
| 2–4 times a month | 0 | 68 | ||