Literature DB >> 29316600

Impact of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on 90-Day Episode Costs and Post-Acute Care Utilization in Total Knee Replacement Patients with Disuse Atrophy.

Sarmistha Pal1, Morad Chughtai2, Assem A Sultan2, Anton Khlopas2, Nipun Sodhi2, Nicole E George3, Jennifer I Etcheson3, Chukwuweike U Gwam3, Jared M Newman2, Linsen T Samuel2, Anil Bhave4, Joan E DaVanzo1, Michael A Mont2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated differences in: 1) total episode payments, 2) probability of hospital readmission, 3) probability of inpatient rehab facility (IRF) and utilization, and 4) probability of skilled nursing care facility (SNF) utilization in patients who had disuse atrophy and underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and either did, or did not, receive preoperative home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Medicare limited dataset for a 5% sample of beneficiaries from 2014 and 2015 to construct episodes-of-care for TKA (DRG-470) patients with disuse atrophy who underwent a TKA during the 30 days prior to hospital admission and 90 days post-discharge. Patients were stratified into those who either did or did not receive pre- and postoperative NMES therapy. An ordinary least square (OLS) model was used to estimate the impact of NMES on total episode. Linear probability models were used to estimate the impact of NMES on SNF or IRF utilization and readmission.
RESULTS: A $3,274 reduction in episode payments for patients who used preoperative NMES versus those who did not (p<0.001) was demonstrated. The probability of readmission was 12.7% lower for those who used preoperative NMES therapy versus those who did not (p=0.609). The probability of utilizing IRF and SNF was 56.7% (p=0.061) and 46.4% (p=<0.001) lower for those who used pre- and postoperative NMES versus those who did not, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Significant reduction in total episode payments and SNF utilization for TKA patients with disuse atrophy who had NMES therapy was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29316600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  4 in total

1.  Non-operative treatment options for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Michael DeRogatis; Hiba K Anis; Nipun Sodhi; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Morad Chughtai; Anil Bhave; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

2.  Utilization and outcomes of neuromuscular electric stimulation in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Assem A Sultan; Linsen T Samuel; Anil Bhave
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  A Novel Mobile App-based Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Therapy for the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis: Results From an Extension Study of a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Multicenter Trial.

Authors:  Vinod Dasa; Nebojsa V Skrepnik; Dena Petersen; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2022-09-12

Review 4.  Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the recovery of people with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit: A narrative review.

Authors:  Louise C Burgess; Lalitha Venugopalan; James Badger; Tamsyn Street; Gad Alon; Jonathan C Jarvis; Thomas W Wainwright; Tamara Everington; Paul Taylor; Ian D Swain
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.912

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.