Yoshihide Takahashi1,2, Syu Yamashita2, Masahito Suzuki2, Kento Yabe2, Kenzo Hirao1,3. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Cardiology, Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Heart Rhythm Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by electrical activity arising from focal sources. We sought to test whether catheter ablation that targets focal sources can improve on current ablation protocols for persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients with persistent AF whose AF did not terminate with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, the left atrium was mapped with a 20-pole high-density mapping catheter using CARTO® 3 navigation. If a site demonstrated centrifugal activation over at least three consecutive cycles, it was deemed a focal source and ablated. If AF remained, defragmentation was performed until AF was terminated. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was compared between the study patients and propensity score matched historical controls who had undergone conventional stepwise ablation. Of the 68 study patients, 2.9 ± 1.9 focal sources were identified in 60 patients. Focal sources displayed transient centrifugal activation patterns for a median of six consecutive cycles. Total radiofrequency duration was shorter in the study group (62 ± 16 minutes vs. 75 ± 24 minutes, P = 0.0003). During a 1-year follow-up period, 39 (57%) and 26 (38%) patients were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in the study and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.96, P = 0.009). Improvement of clinical outcome was mainly driven by a decrease in recurrence of atrial tachycardia in the study patients (22% vs. 40%, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that focal sources are appropriate ablation targets in addition to the PVs in persistent AF.
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies suggest that atrial fibrillation (AF) is maintained by electrical activity arising from focal sources. We sought to test whether catheter ablation that targets focal sources can improve on current ablation protocols for persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients with persistent AF whose AF did not terminate with pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, the left atrium was mapped with a 20-pole high-density mapping catheter using CARTO® 3 navigation. If a site demonstrated centrifugal activation over at least three consecutive cycles, it was deemed a focal source and ablated. If AF remained, defragmentation was performed until AF was terminated. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was compared between the study patients and propensity score matched historical controls who had undergone conventional stepwise ablation. Of the 68 study patients, 2.9 ± 1.9 focal sources were identified in 60 patients. Focal sources displayed transient centrifugal activation patterns for a median of six consecutive cycles. Total radiofrequency duration was shorter in the study group (62 ± 16 minutes vs. 75 ± 24 minutes, P = 0.0003). During a 1-year follow-up period, 39 (57%) and 26 (38%) patients were free from atrial tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs in the study and control groups, respectively (hazard ratio: 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.96, P = 0.009). Improvement of clinical outcome was mainly driven by a decrease in recurrence of atrial tachycardia in the study patients (22% vs. 40%, P = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that focal sources are appropriate ablation targets in addition to the PVs in persistent AF.